Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
SETAPAK GREEN RESIDENCES by UOA, Your Enclave for Refresh Living Investment
webby88
|
Oct 11 2010, 09:06 PM
|
|
QUOTE(vreis @ Oct 11 2010, 12:09 PM) Before 222 was launch, SG tentative price is very much lower but after the launching of 222 & thereafter 288, SG price went up even before launch to match the pricing of 222 & 288. So in a way, you may say that 222 & 288 cause the price of SG to shoot up BTW, from the look of it, most of KLCC view for 222/288 will be blocked by SG it seems. KP Properties are 1st time developer so no reference for their OWN project yet but they're quite a good main contractor. FYI, being a good contractor & developer is totally different thing. Looks like UOA is following the pricing strategy of KP but the design of SG facade is very outdated compared to 288. How much SG design can be improved before the S&P is left to be seen. Hate to see people paying high price but getting an "ancient" design not matching any new condo standard.
|
|
|
|
john@
|
Oct 11 2010, 09:17 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(webby88 @ Oct 11 2010, 09:06 PM) Looks like UOA is following the pricing strategy of KP but the design of SG facade is very outdated compared to 288. How much SG design can be improved before the S&P is left to be seen. Hate to see people paying high price but getting an "ancient" design not matching any new condo standard. i have to say myself very impress of 222 facade as well, seems like they even done it better in 288. i went to the show house, nice....high ceiling, big main door, good material use for the windows and the bathrooms.
|
|
|
|
mature
|
Oct 11 2010, 09:22 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(john@ @ Oct 11 2010, 09:17 PM) i have to say myself very impress of 222 facade as well, seems like they even done it better in 288. i went to the show house, nice....high ceiling, big main door, good material use for the windows and the bathrooms. yea...i went to 222/288 show unit. design and material is really nice and high end. if setapak green quality is same as bangsar south, then 222/288 is nicer. anyone can provide more accurate info on uoa price and sqft? is 288 providing 1 or 2 car parks? This post has been edited by mature: Oct 11 2010, 09:38 PM
|
|
|
|
webby88
|
Oct 11 2010, 09:50 PM
|
|
QUOTE(john@ @ Oct 11 2010, 09:17 PM) i have to say myself very impress of 222 facade as well, seems like they even done it better in 288. i went to the show house, nice....high ceiling, big main door, good material use for the windows and the bathrooms. 222 / 288 design is very modern. Their selling point is the same contractor building St Mary's in KL. UOA is very conservative in their design. Practical interior but outdated exterior facade. Was told they are still improving the design so will see their outcome before December 2010. One nice point about SG is the L shape balcony.
|
|
|
|
john@
|
Oct 11 2010, 10:03 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(mature @ Oct 11 2010, 09:22 PM) yea...i went to 222/288 show unit. design and material is really nice and high end. if setapak green quality is same as bangsar south, then 222/288 is nicer. anyone can provide more accurate info on uoa price and sqft? is 288 providing 1 or 2 car parks? For 288, i did asked the sale staff, 1400 sqft 1 car park only, but bigger size like 1800 sqft got 2 car parks, other size not sure cos didn't question more on that.
|
|
|
|
hidden830726
|
Oct 11 2010, 10:16 PM
|
|
The thing i don't like about 288 is the fact that the entrance is facing the monsoon drain and way too near the the school. I heard there will be a small bridge connecting the school and this side.
Even with the new 4 lane road (promise by Kp to build), i can only imagine traffic jam near the entrance when after / start school time. Also, school always ring a bell.
Nonetheless, with the 3 development (SG, 222 & 288), with the inflow of resident (potentially with higher spending power) i can see the resurrection of the shop lot nearby, i can only imagine, old town, paparich etc in the corner.
If you looking at the bigger picture, the price ain't too expensive.
This post has been edited by hidden830726: Oct 11 2010, 10:17 PM
|
|
|
|
webby88
|
Oct 12 2010, 12:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Oct 11 2010, 10:16 PM) The thing i don't like about 288 is the fact that the entrance is facing the monsoon drain and way too near the the school. I heard there will be a small bridge connecting the school and this side. Even with the new 4 lane road (promise by Kp to build), i can only imagine traffic jam near the entrance when after / start school time. Also, school always ring a bell. Nonetheless, with the 3 development (SG, 222 & 288), with the inflow of resident (potentially with higher spending power) i can see the resurrection of the shop lot nearby, i can only imagine, old town, paparich etc in the corner. If you looking at the bigger picture, the price ain't too expensive. How to build 4 lanes? Diamond Square access road is so limited in space.
|
|
|
|
hidden830726
|
Oct 12 2010, 01:16 PM
|
|
4 lanes road along the current road that lead to the 288/222 show room (along the monson drain) The area where they hold the buffet will became part of the 4 lane road. (That's what i'm being told)
This post has been edited by hidden830726: Oct 12 2010, 01:18 PM
|
|
|
|
webby88
|
Oct 12 2010, 01:25 PM
|
|
Looks like a competition between UOA and KP in Setapak? If UOA wants to maintain their reputation, they need to outdo KP. Likewise goes to KP.
If UOA continues to deliver based on their old design, maybe for speed of delivery, approvals with DBKL and cost savings with outdated renderings, then they may very well be taking a wrong decision. The verdict will be in 3 years time. I hope we will not be comparing an ultra modern design next to an outdated design.
|
|
|
|
hidden830726
|
Oct 12 2010, 01:42 PM
|
|
With Kp selling point as the high end contractor on project such as St mary, I'm sure UOA can get some stuff from Binjai project. A door knob maybe?
|
|
|
|
webby88
|
Oct 12 2010, 02:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Oct 12 2010, 01:42 PM) With Kp selling point as the high end contractor on project such as St mary, I'm sure UOA can get some stuff from Binjai project. A door knob maybe? If only UOA can deliver the same facade as Binjai, this will surely be a standout in Setapak. If according to the artist impression it looks really outdated.
|
|
|
|
hidden830726
|
Oct 12 2010, 04:55 PM
|
|
288 offering 40k worth of furnishing which already imbued to its selling price. Imo:
It would be great if UOA can provide the options for owner to opt for customization / premium add-on, such as kitchen cabinet, fridge, oven, burner/hood etc, possibly with additional cost, but at least, customer get what they want. And they (UOA) nullify their rival's (KP) competitive advantage.
|
|
|
|
webby88
|
Oct 12 2010, 05:26 PM
|
|
QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Oct 12 2010, 04:55 PM) 288 offering 40k worth of furnishing which already imbued to its selling price. Imo: It would be great if UOA can provide the options for owner to opt for customization / premium add-on, such as kitchen cabinet, fridge, oven, burner/hood etc, possibly with additional cost, but at least, customer get what they want. And they (UOA) nullify their rival's (KP) competitive advantage. I don't think UOA will allow such option.
|
|
|
|
hidden830726
|
Oct 12 2010, 06:58 PM
|
|
QUOTE(webby88 @ Oct 12 2010, 05:26 PM) I don't think UOA will allow such option. haha. true. Then give the buyer something else. They don't have much "options"anyway. “It takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to lose it” Benjamin Franklin Anyone have further news on SG or even 288? This post has been edited by hidden830726: Oct 12 2010, 06:59 PM
|
|
|
|
webby88
|
Oct 12 2010, 07:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Oct 12 2010, 06:58 PM) haha. true. Then give the buyer something else. They don't have much "options"anyway. “It takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to lose it” Benjamin Franklin Anyone have further news on SG or even 288? Agree, UOA need to build good reputation through good quality, value and luxury. If SG is built according to the artist impression design, I would say they are overpriced. No difference between SG and Prima Setapak II thus SG is deemed expensive. If UOA deliver a modern facade maybe equivalent or better than 222/288 providing a more luxurious ambiance, I would say the prices are justified. This will provide a benchmark to luxurious living in Setapak vicinity. This post has been edited by webby88: Oct 12 2010, 07:38 PM
|
|
|
|
dream.angels
|
Oct 12 2010, 10:20 PM
|
|
can i know where's d sales office?
|
|
|
|
webby88
|
Oct 12 2010, 10:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(dream.angels @ Oct 12 2010, 10:20 PM) can i know where's d sales office? Bangsarsouth, Kerinchi at the Village Gallery.
|
|
|
|
dream.angels
|
Oct 12 2010, 10:25 PM
|
|
webby88..thanks a lot..!
|
|
|
|
hidden830726
|
Oct 12 2010, 10:46 PM
|
|
Instead of improving their facade, i would prefer UOA to focus on its interior fittings and finishing.
|
|
|
|
ng168
|
Oct 12 2010, 11:11 PM
|
Getting Started
|
Hi all, Talk about 288. Type of square fit they have are 1408, 1416, 1563, 1869 & 1 uint of 891.
1 car park per uint but option to purchase 2nd bay. i do ask for unit at level 16, cost RM501,800 facing genting view.
Their windows are sound proof and tinted.
Zero enrty cost and some more now got 5% rebate on total cost.
Price included: - 1) Kitchen cabinet, fridge, Microwave oven, Oven, Gas hod, Cooker hod, Air-cond for master room, air cond piping, vanity top and shower screen to all bath room 2) No need pay interest when under construction 3) S&P, Stamping all charges absorbed by developer, zero entry cost.
all electrical item using ELECTROLUX brand
This post has been edited by ng168: Oct 12 2010, 11:13 PM
|
|
|
|