QUOTE(evofantasy @ Sep 28 2010, 06:27 PM)
seriously wut with ppl dissing nada cause he dun play so much anymore or is as good as he was (as though past his prime, he is non-existence by some of the comments here)?
nada was an icon to scbw when it was in its prime thus having such a fat paycheck (and a team lead) even when he is not playing much...
and him coming over to sc2 is a really big blow to kespa (especially after the whole kespa drama from IEM where they pulled nada off his showmatch as they were afraid koreans would see nada playing sc2)...
and since when is kespa non-profit?
they are a NGO under the sports ministry...
they tried to steal it and failed as ip rights is one of the highest protected rights...
those in the IT field would know wut a big issue it would be when some1 is trying to claim rights to ur own IP...
and scbw is a good profit sport which is why kespa is worried to loose it since they dun have rights to sc2...
if all they care is esport and not profit, they would have supported sc2 lol
Do you think they would want to stop pro league and destroy its construction of the scene and jump on to sc2 ?
QUOTE
for them to try and challenge blizzard over blizzard's own ip rights is pretty screwed up...
They did not challenge blizzard they are just negotiating between them over the screening time of the games blizzards wants to take the prime slot of BW which is to kespa isn't possible at all cost.Show me a proof that Kespa is actually trying to acquire Blizzards IP if that is what you were saying .
Exactly SC BW is the soul of Korea I don't think any one with a right mind would want to take off a sport which has been existing and money gobbling for 12 years hence no way Kespa is going to let go of BW.
Added on September 28, 2010, 6:38 pmQUOTE(Quazacolt @ Sep 28 2010, 06:27 PM)
point to me, where in that page, states that they are a non-profit organization?
also, you *MAY* want to look up definitions on what is "intellectual property" and "non profit organization" (for NPO, ctrl + f the page you link, it is actually right there)
=edit=
hmm how come p can become g, btw, it wasnt hotlinked, so just ctrl f it in the search box
Kespa is funded by the Minister of cultural hence it isn't a body which sets up to be like other profitable organization. According to wiki definition of an NGO
QUOTE
In the cases in which NGOs are funded totally or partially by governments,
this does qualifies KESPA as a NGO as per requested by you to look at the definition .
This thread says it all to all who thinks Kespa is a money making monster....
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessag...topic_id=128517This post has been edited by Laguna: Sep 28 2010, 06:47 PM