lol...my love for d7000 have gone in to the exile maybe ill wait for my fren to get his... and test like hell muahahahha

Nice, didn't know got such link already .

Somehow I was comparing between the D7000 and D3. D7000's performance is acceptable for me when compared to D3 . DX versus FX.

D3 way better la.
D7000 ISO 3200 is not acceptable at all.

This post has been edited by KTCY: Nov 12 2010, 09:58 AM

Really sucks ler..... it disappoint me so much if it's really accurate test!! Haaiz.... I thought the newer sensor with much better iso control is the point for me to get the D7000 over the D300s, but seem really disappointing!!

Told ya before. D3100 / D7000 might be the "white rat" for the new sensor.
Get D300s la. Semi pro body.

What's more surprising? Check out EOS 55D? Comparable/Better than 60D???

Funny how some review shows great pictures while there are others that are, as said, muddy even at ISO3200. Is it a batch problem or the reviews should not be trusted at all?

1* dats right, d300 is upgraded to d300s.. so its either d300s and d7k
2* hahaha dont die yet, still lots of sin to 'do'..

muddy as in.. milo-susu muddy or teh tarik muddy?

Yeah been thinking the same thing too.... i mean at this place shows great pictures and the other places shows otherwise..... whats the obvious here is maybe the batch problem like akachester said.....

Ya worr..... my mind was telling me don't believe these reviews.... as D7000 should out performs all, somewhere FX level of noise control.

I rmb I saw photos taken D3100 new sensor was superbly sharp at even iso1600, so I think D7000 would b a beast =.=

I don't know. I think I need to get it on my hand before can tell

Slightly better than teh tarik muddy

It's actually depends on lens also. I mount 200mm f/2 on D3100 but mount 18-55 on D7000. which one you think will better ?

D7000 somewhere FX level ? next life la mate. Comparing FX and DX is like comparing Inspira with Ferrari. Inspira to win the race ? Next life

What about review from JAPAN themselves, with all ISO range sample and different Noise Control?
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/...109_405647.html

I think best to wait for a full review from dpreview. Or there already is one?

i think thats not a crop image... hence the noise are unnotice-able or is it a crop image?

Those photos ISO 3200 noise is acceptable tho
Still I believe SG photos, no idea why.

Maybe lighting affect it more? The japan site sample taken outdoor, while the SG one is indoor right?

I think personal hands on is the best review.
Personally, I find the D7000 sample picture too bright, the colour is bright; D300S seems better in this aspect, close to FX quality reproduction.

Yeap. Probably because outdoor vs indoor.

I also think so.... that day played with D7000 indoor at KLPF, really vomit blood at iso200

KLPF unit might not be end product. It might be pre-production unit whereby the firmware is not the final yet. I used to see a few Canon pre-production firmware unit too

And to be ISo 3200 outdoor noise clear is not important as I seldom shoot outdoor with ISO 3200. Indoor noise is visible and muddy is not acceptable at all (referring to SG photos)

Click on the image to view 100% size.