QUOTE(hackerzx @ Sep 17 2010, 11:06 AM)
u compare d3100/d7000 with 5dmark2 or new replacement model for d700?
Will you compare Accord with Saga ?Nikon D90 V9, Nikon mid-high range DSLR
|
|
 Sep 17 2010, 11:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
 
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Sep 17 2010, 11:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(hackerzx @ Sep 17 2010, 11:12 AM) thats why i asked I was talking about D3100 / D7000. Never say or compare with 5DMKII mate   |
|
|
Sep 17 2010, 11:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(hackerzx @ Sep 17 2010, 11:16 AM) not u la boss ..i ask maxh3h3 Oops. My bad But seriously, I too can't resist with 5DMKII especially when my friend throw me 50L, 24L, 135L, 17-40L, 14L, 70-200L to play with  |
|
|
Sep 17 2010, 01:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 17 2010, 12:45 PM) I'm getting bored with those 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L and 70-200 f/2.8 ISII used by my friends (1Dmk4(s) and 5dmk2(s)), always poisoning me yawn. Oh and also the 24mm f/1.4L but good thing I'm not into such lens xD. Mine not because all my friend owned that but because he is from CMM so whatever shit also got This post has been edited by KTCY: Sep 17 2010, 01:08 PM |
|
|
Sep 17 2010, 01:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 17 2010, 01:40 PM) Actually because everytime I use the 5dmk2 or 1Dmk4, I always need to search for the buttons. Not used to it CMM = Canon Marketing Malaysia. . The other day when shooting with friend's D3+70200 f/2.8, then my friend told me that his 5dmk2 + 85mm f/1.2L better, so he borrowed me and went toilet.. I took a few shots then went back with the D3 wahahaha. Not nice to handle and not user friendly!LOL, not sure what is CMM. But my bunch of friends using Canon are all very rich... so basically almost all lens below 200mm f/2 is available for playing xD. What I can recall is probably 24 f/1.4, 50 f/1.2, 85 f/1.2, 70200 f/2.8 ISII, 70200 f/2.8 IS, 70200 f/4 IS, 100 macro, 16-35 f/2.8... the rest is those normal lens I guess... Oh wait, got that fish eye too lol. Cute lens. |
|
|
Sep 21 2010, 11:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(loverjinx @ Sep 21 2010, 10:49 AM) yeah. got to save more then Or stick with my old dusty SB-800  |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 22 2010, 10:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(faareast @ Sep 22 2010, 08:01 PM) in the model shooting like that, you instruct the model or they just pose like they want? Instruct for those that have no idea how to pose.Those pro 1, I take up camera already pose for me QUOTE(Arawin92 @ Sep 22 2010, 10:40 PM) guys, can someone suggest a good value flash for my d90.under budget arnd 500 bucks....i dont mind any brand as long as its worth it.tq. Nissin 466 |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 05:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
D7000 ISO 6400 looks pretty bad to me.
ISO 3200 just acceptable. Of course I view it on full reso. If crop means nice to you, I can just crop any photos to small reso and have a good looking photos This post has been edited by KTCY: Sep 24 2010, 05:58 PM |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 06:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 24 2010, 05:59 PM) So, what ISO of D90 is acceptable to you? ISO 800 or lower.Well, sometimes I use ISO 1600 when fine dining. And I have to convert to b&w as quite grainy already. |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 06:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Nope. Not enough. That's why I don't have the excitement for D7000
|
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 06:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 24 2010, 06:27 PM) Its even better than D3/D700 leh haha! 2 stop! LOL~ D3/D700 is only 1 stop better than D90 lo. 2 stop as in ISO 12800 and ISO 25600 ? |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 06:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 24 2010, 06:32 PM) To me, D3/D700 is 1 stop better than D90/D300/D300s, 3200 to 1600. D700 / D3 ISO 6400 is so so clean la As what you said, 800 acceptable from D90, and 3200 acceptable from D7000. That's 2 stop.  ISO 3200 is like our ISO 400.  |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 06:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 24 2010, 06:35 PM) LOL, I use D3/D700 frequently lah... 6400 clean is the D3s... the D3 and D700 6400 not acceptable for me.I mean from the sample photo posted by you. I don't want use but always kena use because people throw it to me and in the end kena poison. Damn. 1 thing, 5DMKII ISO 6400 better than D700. With 1.2L = Dying. This post has been edited by KTCY: Sep 24 2010, 06:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 06:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 24 2010, 06:46 PM) If you compare against D3/D700's 6400 ISO, it is similar to me. Meaning most photographer should dump their d3/d700 to get D7000 as the ISO is SIMILAR huh ?5dmk2? Bored of it haha, always playing with it also lah... my bunch of friends using Canon alot of rich guys, so those f/1.2L are pretty common. Especially the 85mm f/1.2L, the 50mm f/1.2L still ok only got one haha~ You said before and I know who they are Nick, Han, Max and etc. They paid for it. I got to play free Anyone of your friend already got 60D ? Played with it and my guess D7000 will pawn that 60D. And my supplier just got back from Photokina. D7000 video is impressive. I will try to get that video and post up. Others than that, nothing. Asking about ISO, they ask me forget about it. Get FF better. QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 24 2010, 06:53 PM) o_O who said that. What are you trying to say ? To me D3/D700's 3200ISO looks like D700's 3200ISO.  |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 06:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(kevin23 @ Sep 24 2010, 06:53 PM) Hie,anybody can gimme an estimation of the price for the Nikon D7000... D7000 won't be cheap. Body itself at least 4k (My guess tho. Haven't heard any from NM yet)I have narrowed down to either this d7000 or the d90. WHich one is better? |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 07:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(kevin23 @ Sep 24 2010, 07:17 PM) Oyea,this D90 is Fx or Dx sensor? D90 is DX.And is there a huge diff between these two? thanks Huge different ? A question. Ferrari and Accord got different ? |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 08:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(8sg9ft @ Sep 24 2010, 08:49 PM) I think the performance of the D7000 at ISO 6400 is pretty acceptable..decent enough..DX sensor leh..not bad wat.. Yes but don't say it's SIMILAR to D700/D3/D3s. Still far away.This post has been edited by KTCY: Sep 24 2010, 08:56 PM |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 09:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
I think I will get the sample photos / or once D7000 it's available locally, I will try it side by side. I still insist on this, DX will never par with FX.
Of course it will be better than current D90. And if anyone of you been following Nikon, every series of their DSLR will be better than previous one be it professional range or mid range. Eg. D80 < D300 < D90/D5000 < D300s 35mm N will be launched at KL soon. Heard from NM. This post has been edited by KTCY: Sep 24 2010, 09:06 PM |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(Isepunye @ Sep 24 2010, 09:07 PM) Added on September 24, 2010, 9:07 pm i reduce it prefer softer image ? |
|
|
Sep 24 2010, 09:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(8sg9ft @ Sep 24 2010, 09:10 PM) haha..no lar..i don't think it's similar..but better than D90..it should be anyway..since it's a "replacement" for it.. Better is definitely. I have no doubt about that.Added on September 24, 2010, 9:13 pm QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 24 2010, 09:10 PM) Ahh this! Good, compare both units side by side let's see how both compares. It will be idiots for me to compare side by side with FF as it's more like taking Honda vs Ferrari But I will do that. Hopefully my friend won't call me retard for this This post has been edited by KTCY: Sep 24 2010, 09:13 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0367sec
 0.27
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:28 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.