Nikon D90 V9, Nikon mid-high range DSLR
|
|
 Nov 3 2010, 01:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#261
|
 
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again 
|
QUOTE(Cwz90 @ Nov 3 2010, 01:02 PM) thx.... is a nice lens?? DX lens line up from the very best. 1. 17-55 (No doubt king of DX) 2. 12-24 (Sharp even at f/4 and 12mm :drool) 3. 10.5mm (Sharpest fisheye I ever use ! ) 2. 16-85 3. 18-70 (Legendary kit lens till today)  |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 04:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#262
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 3 2010, 04:06 PM) Really bro? I might change to 16-85. I don't use 2.8 that often coz it's kinda soft, but if I really need to use in lowlight, I'll switch to my 50 1.4 16-85 more expensive than your 17-50. 2k+ for brand new ! And yes. Tested |
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 05:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#263
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Nov 3 2010, 04:42 PM) I see, nice Grab it.  RM2180 here in KB, Kelantan. Don't have any other choices than the 16-85. Good range too, wider and longer, worth it I guess  QUOTE(Cwz90 @ Nov 3 2010, 04:45 PM) how is the 18-70? fixed aperture?? how much it cost? thx 3.5-4.5No more new. All 2nd hand. Price vary from 600-750 depends on condition. |
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 05:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#264
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Nov 3 2010, 05:19 PM) F3.5-5.6 IIRC... Anyone can confirm about the price? Not sure is it selling separately outside... Last time was D80 kit lens. D70s kit la. D80 kit is 18-135and is 3.5-4.5  QUOTE(kenji_britney @ Nov 3 2010, 05:21 PM) 18-70 no VR So ? 18-105 got VR but quality  This post has been edited by KTCY: Nov 3 2010, 05:28 PM |
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 05:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#265
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Nov 3 2010, 05:53 PM) Damn lovely lah 17-55. So convenient to bring around for holiday use. Buy la. 6.8k only  Die la. Kind of urged to get 70-200VR2 for AFAX event now  Just put shah alam la.  Typo  This post has been edited by KTCY: Nov 3 2010, 06:02 PM |
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 06:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#266
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Nov 3 2010, 06:00 PM) How much the price now? Shashinki 7.15k, YL 7.5k le So much over price  QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 3 2010, 06:01 PM) KTCY always got prices only he can get one. LOL. Anyways you can get it easily at RM6950 +/- depending on your nego.  Actually typo. I wanted to press 8 but jadi 5  |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 06:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#267
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 3 2010, 06:40 PM) RM6800 is a good price. But question is, other ppl can get that price or not? 4.5k ..85mm f/1.4G price now is how much? Haha those where normal people like me can get it at. You die liao ah ? |
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 07:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#268
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Got stock. Saw 1 unit 2-3days back. And yes include postage
 |
|
|
Nov 4 2010, 02:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#269
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Nov 3 2010, 11:04 PM) No really heavier also. If you compare 70200 to those primes you need to cover that range, 85mm+105mm+135mm+185mm+200mm together, which one weights more? Only idiots will carry all those prime together.I only come across people carrying 20, 35, 50, 85, 135. Little heavier than 70200 QUOTE(faareast @ Nov 4 2010, 12:17 AM) what about 70-300 tele? so, cheap.. Without VR can throw into rubbish bin. Piece of junk |
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 08:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#270
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(mcheemun83 @ Nov 5 2010, 12:30 AM) hi sifu sifu, nissin i622 flash gun good to use onot? pls gif some opinion.. How you know it's good ? Looks only I also can feel it's good la SB700 looks like very good wor.. Wait until you play only say la. If between 622 n SB-700, still need to ask meh ? |
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 10:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#271
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Nov 5 2010, 10:20 AM) wana ask all d sifu here... Not the best but better than alot others !is demb diffuser one of d best diffuser...? coz plan to buy a very gd diffuser... ani advice...? |
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 11:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#272
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(faareast @ Nov 5 2010, 11:30 AM) need advice here.. Consider that sigma 10-20 f/3.5 constant aperture if you're into capturing interior. plan to get a wide angle lens... choose between tokina 11-16, tokina 12-24 and nikon 12-24. want to use for : 1)wedding 2)event (with KDN, meeting) 3)capture building 4)panorama any comment? rightnow i'm more to tokina 11-16 as it f2.8.. but it has shorter range.. anyway, this is my 5month plan.. so in 5month, i must get enough money no matter what.. rm2.3K in 5 month.. huh.. any idea? 11-16 is good but nikkor 12-24 so much better with longer zoom. |
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 11:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#273
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
f4 more than enough. You pay peanuts, you get monkey. Nikkor is damn good. Play with it and seriously in love with it.
Else, if you want get 14-24 f/2.8 la  |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 12:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#274
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(faareast @ Nov 5 2010, 12:00 PM) i want the widest to be in range of 11 or 12mm.. Tokina 12-24 is rubbish 14 is kinda not so wide... will consider 12-24.. but with diff of rm500 can get f2.8.. in low light cond, i need high aperture.. most of indoor event are in low light.. so, f4 is ok? nikkor is good i know, but the price i cant afford it now.. between tokina 11-16 and tokina 12-24, the 12-24 is much more cheaper... KTYC, do u have flikr? what lens do u prefer for indoor (wide angle, not prime)? |
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 12:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#275
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
5.8k
|
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 12:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#276
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(faareast @ Nov 5 2010, 12:15 PM) that will kill me... You think tokina can beat Nikkor ? btw, nikon 12-24 price? cant find it here in trade zone.. just found the tokina one.. i heard that tokina 12-24 cant beat nikon 12-24.. but tokina 11-16 is superior that nikon 12-24.. it that true? Maybe can. Next life |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0430sec
 0.72
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 11:39 PM |
Quote