QUOTE(remysix @ Jun 21 2005, 04:23 PM)
why....what happend???anything wrong with 754??? SANDRA 2005 MEMORY OVERCLOCKING CHALLENGE, OVERCLOCKED MEMORY COLLECTION !!
SANDRA 2005 MEMORY OVERCLOCKING CHALLENGE, OVERCLOCKED MEMORY COLLECTION !!
|
|
Jun 21 2005, 05:48 PM
|
|
VIP
4,032 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MSR Headquaters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 21 2005, 05:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
317 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: DeeeeeeeeeeeeeepDown |
hahaha..... no lar.... nothing's wrong... Jgn cakap kuat˛ laaa malu...
This post has been edited by takatadome: Jun 21 2005, 05:51 PM |
|
|
Jun 21 2005, 05:56 PM
|
|
VIP
4,032 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MSR Headquaters |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 07:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 07:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Penang |
Diz iz mine:
Rams: 4x256MB KVR DDR400 @ DDR333 (due to 533FSB proc) Chipset: Kingston Chipset Vdimm: how to check this? Processor: P4 Northwood 2.8(533FSB) ![]() This post has been edited by aaron_lwm: Jun 22 2005, 07:58 AM |
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 09:54 AM
|
|
VIP
4,032 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MSR Headquaters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 12:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang / Shah Alam |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 01:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Soleanna |
RAM = 2x256mb Geil blue , 2* 256mb Corsait value
chipset = Geil-unkwon , cosair - some values select chip... Vdimm applied = 2.6 1T OR 2T = ???(dunno how to read...lol ) system = Pentium 4 3.0E CPU speed =3ghz hmm adjusting the timings does help a bit..... the screenshot ... |
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 01:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang / Shah Alam |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 04:31 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
69 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 05:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,562 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(dinster @ Jun 22 2005, 01:50 PM) Corsair's statementTCCD Supply Demystified June 20, 2005 - The Samsung "TCCD" memory chip is the best overclocking IC for the AMD platform. Since speculation began about the TCCD reaching End-of-Life (EOL), the enthusiast community has been concerned about its near- and long-term availability. The purpose of this update is to provide a lead on the current status of this very popular IC. The TCCD specification was tailor-made for Corsair by Samsung. As a part of the agreement, Samsung has agreed to directly supply Corsair's TCCD requirements until the end of 2005 and beyond. Contrary to rumours that indicate universal unavailability of TCCD, Corsair continues to provide high performance XMS memory modules made with 100% Samsung original TCCD IC's. There has been suggestions on TCC5 being an equal replacement of TCCD. While the ICs share similar names, they do not share identical performance characteristics. TCC5 is a down-bin of TCCD and does not deliver the same performance promise that TCCD does. Based on our stringent testing requirements, only TCCD can meet the demand. Corsair also uses TCC5 IC's but because they are of lesser capability, TCC5 IC's are used only in the lower grade parts. Below is a list of TCCD based Corsair products that are currently shipping: Product Family Product Name Module Speed Module Latencies XMS 3200XL 400 MHz / PC3200 2-2-2-5 4400C25 550 MHz / PC4400 2.5-4-4-8 XMS PRO 3200XL PRO 400 MHz / PC3200 2-2-2-5 XMS XPERT 3200XL XPERT 400 MHz / PC3200 2-2-2-5 For more information on Corsair's products or the Samsung TCCD IC's, please email info@corsairmemory.com or visit http://www.corsair.com. ========================================= OCZ Clears Up the TCC5 Confusion 2005-06-01 Recently we have had some inquires and OCZ would like to openly clarify the circumstances surrounding the substitution of Samsung TCCD for TCC5 in the renowned OCZ Platinum series memory. Following the lack of availability of TCCD chips, OCZ replaced TCCD chips with TCC5 chips on its Platinum DDR modules. Concerned enthusiasts that are seeing lower maximum overclocks with recently purchased PC-3200 EL Platinum Rev. 2 are assuming this is due to a difference in the performance potential of the new chips. "There is absolutely zero difference between tested TCC5 and tested TCCD," says Eric Nelson, OCZ Product Development Director. "Because we are seeing a tremendous increase in DDR frequency, the chip "binning" process has adjusted to the new memory speeds OCZ now offers. As we now have four Platinum series speed ratings, chips qualified for PC-4800 operation are not slated for use in PC-3200 modules, unless stock is sufficient in higher speed parts. Users noticing lower overclocks are seeing the direct result of rising memory speeds, not a difference in Samsung TCC5 chips. OCZ Platinum is still the fastest DDR1 available today and will provide users with the absolute highest performance. If maximum overclocking potential is desired, purchasing a product with a higher speed rating will take the risk out of your purchase, insuring you of extreme guaranteed speeds." "With the Samsung TCCD hitting EOL (End of Life), OCZ continues their high end Platinum line with TCC5's as replacements," said John Chen, Editor-in-Chief at InsaneTek. "Note that TCC5 is going to replace TCCD based Platinum memory, which means the regular PC3200 Platinum non-Rev2 probably won't use it. But for the rest of the Platinum stuff, PC3200 Rev2, PC3700, PC4200, and PC4800, you should be seeing them equipped with TCC5 chips. Is the replacement any good? Definitely yes, because it's still good stuff." |
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 05:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang / Shah Alam |
damn Corsair !
only TCC5 left for other company... |
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 06:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Penang |
If not mistaken, the processor also affects the rating of the rams in sandra right, mine might be low due to a sucky processor, posted above
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 06:39 PM
|
|
VIP
4,032 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MSR Headquaters |
QUOTE(dinster @ Jun 22 2005, 12:32 PM) wahh...Tq..TQ bro DIN... |
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 06:40 PM
|
|
VIP
4,032 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MSR Headquaters |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 06:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 06:44 PM
|
|
VIP
4,032 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MSR Headquaters |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 06:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
timings
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 10:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang / Shah Alam |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2005, 10:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,115 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang / Shah Alam |
|
| Change to: | 0.0164sec
0.36
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 10:48 AM |