Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
SANDRA 2005 MEMORY OVERCLOCKING CHALLENGE, OVERCLOCKED MEMORY COLLECTION !!
|
TSdinster
|
May 22 2005, 03:20 AM
|
|
QUOTE(zt_lee @ May 22 2005, 01:40 AM) RAM = 2x512mb corsair xms rev1.4 chipset =tccd Vdimm applied = 2.8v 1T OR 2T = 1T system = p42.4c CPU speed = 12*285fsb errrr.. Corsair XMS Rev 1.4 TCCD ??
never heard of that before.. ( Rev 1.4 )
|
|
|
|
|
|
apexi78
|
May 22 2005, 04:06 AM
|
|
QUOTE(xcrue @ May 21 2005, 08:57 PM) how to set FSB:DRAM ratio?? my currently is 1:1 nforce2 tend to run best at 1:1 ratio.. QUOTE(dinster @ May 22 2005, 03:20 AM) errrr.. Corsair XMS Rev 1.4 TCCD ??
never heard of that before.. ( Rev 1.4 ) yah, rev1.4 is tccd  but tccd dun run good in i865 or i875, dunno why.. This post has been edited by apexi78: May 22 2005, 04:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
zt_lee
|
May 22 2005, 03:04 PM
|
|
QUOTE(dinster @ May 22 2005, 03:20 AM) errrr.. Corsair XMS Rev 1.4 TCCD ??
never heard of that before.. ( Rev 1.4 ) ya... no bluffing and kidding , see i can do 285fsb with 1:1 divider, this is real thing QUOTE(apexi78 @ May 22 2005, 04:06 AM) nforce2 tend to run best at 1:1 ratio.. yah, rev1.4 is tccd  but tccd dun run good in i865 or i875, dunno why.. ya..not good for intel chipset. but i wonder why gavlim still get 62xx mark witho only 26x fsb since mine cant get this marks, i think he is using 875 chipset as well , doesnt he?? by the way, update: This post has been edited by zt_lee: May 22 2005, 03:06 PM Attached thumbnail(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
gsan
|
May 22 2005, 08:07 PM
|
|
soulfly,
how come your 250 @ 10-3-3-2.5, 1T is better than mine 253 @ 2-2-2-11, 1T ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
irenic
|
May 22 2005, 08:40 PM
|
|
dinster!... aku nak join gak! nah.. RAM = 2x512mb OCZ Rev2 Platinum 2.5-4-3-10 <-- from ur bulk order wakaka  chipset = Samsung TCCD Vdimm applied = 2.8 V 1T OR 2T = 1T system = AMD64 3500+ CPU speed = 2733 MHZ This post has been edited by irenic: May 22 2005, 08:42 PM Attached thumbnail(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
error
|
May 22 2005, 10:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE soulfly,
how come your 250 @ 10-3-3-2.5, 1T is better than mine 253 @ 2-2-2-11, 1T ? hmm , mine oso higher than yours  my guess is that u neva fully optimized the sandra test ? e.g close all background app including those in taskbar ... and make the sandra.exe in high or realtime priority in task manager ... oh ya, test a few times .. sometimes higher , sometimes lower within the test This post has been edited by error: May 22 2005, 10:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
tony
|
May 23 2005, 08:19 PM
|
|
RAM = 2x256mb KVR chipset = BH5 Vdimm applied = 3.4 V 1T OR 2T = Bios set 1T (Sandra show 2T, Everest show 1T) system = Athlon XP1700 DLT3C CPU speed = 2340 MHZ Attached thumbnail(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSdinster
|
May 24 2005, 02:32 AM
|
|
QUOTE(hippies @ May 22 2005, 01:45 AM) The newer batch of OCZ PLAT. rev2 sux! No matter how hard I try i cannot get it to match my older batch which runs 320HTT @ 2.5-3-3-6 @ 2.8V that's bcoz the new batch is carrying Samsung TCC5.. goodbye TCCD  for those who's using TCCD now, u're just damn lucky.. taken from XS forum..
statement from OCZ representative..Originally Posted by AndyOCZ OK, guys, time out!
The TCC5 and TCCD are on the exact same die. We have openly discussed announced here on XS and elsewhere that we may use TCC5. We also do not gurantee what chips we use AND I have seen NO complaints over the way any of the TCCX chips are overclocking. We still bin all the chips to the same specs.
As far as the heatspreaders there is no meaning to them at all. The first TCCD always came in the embossed ones and older TCCD also came with the raised logo spreaders. I have both here, produced at the same time.
NOW, different weeks chips have different properties, just like CPU's. Some of the early TCCD liked more volts. The best of the new TCCD chips do just fine for clocking and do it with less volts SOMETIMES. Again, they don't make all chips in one day, they spread production out over months. TCCD and TCC5 are all getting a bit scarce as the push is on big time for DDR2 now, since AMD is going with that next year. We use what is available to keep you guys suppplied.
Another point is that the PC3200 EL Platinum must run 2-2-2 timings at 200. Not all the TCCD or TCC5 will do this. Again, we have to have chips for the memory that will do spec, or we can't make any.
If your memory does not meet spec, we will glady replace it.
I see a comment about prices. Yes prices are good. If you want a guranteed 600mhz DDR, spend a bit more and get the PC4800, that's why we make it.
As far as RMA's I have no idea. No one has complained an no complaints have been heard. You can always email support through out website.
ThanksThis post has been edited by dinster: May 24 2005, 08:56 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSdinster
|
May 24 2005, 02:34 AM
|
|
QUOTE(gsan @ May 22 2005, 08:07 PM) soulfly, how come your 250 @ 10-3-3-2.5, 1T is better than mine 253 @ 2-2-2-11, 1T ? err.. did u realise that soulfly's system is Sempron socket 754 ? @ irenic show off your Gskill TCCD "LF" la weh.. dont let it collecting dust okay This post has been edited by dinster: May 24 2005, 08:56 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
kianwee
|
May 24 2005, 01:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(dinster @ May 24 2005, 02:32 AM) that's bcoz the new batch is carrying Samsung TCC5.. goodbye TCCD  for those who's using TCCD now, u're just damn lucky.. taken from XS forum..
statement from OCZ representative..Originally Posted by AndyOCZ OK, guys, time out!
The TCC5 and TCCD are on the exact same die. We have openly discussed announced here on XS and elsewhere that we may use TCC5. We also do not gurantee what chips we use AND I have seen NO complaints over the way any of the TCCX chips are overclocking. We still bin all the chips to the same specs.
As far as the heatspreaders there is no meaning to them at all. The first TCCD always came in the embossed ones and older TCCD also came with the raised logo spreaders. I have both here, produced at the same time.
NOW, different weeks chips have different properties, just like CPU's. Some of the early TCCD liked more volts. The best of the new TCCD chips do just fine for clocking and do it with less volts SOMETIMES. Again, they don't make all chips in one day, they spread production out over months. TCCD and TCC5 are all getting a bit scarce as the push is on big time for DDR2 now, since AMD is going with that next year. We use what is available to keep you guys suppplied.
Another point is that the PC3200 EL Platinum must run 2-2-2 timings at 200. Not all the TCCD or TCC5 will do this. Again, we have to have chips for the memory that will do spec, or we can't make any.
If your memory does not meet spec, we will glady replace it.
I see a comment about prices. Yes prices are good. If you want a guranteed 600mhz DDR, spend a bit more and get the PC4800, that's why we make it.
As far as RMA's I have no idea. No one has complained an no complaints have been heard. You can always email support through out website.
Thanks Does it mean that the one in your bulk is TCC5?
|
|
|
|
|
|
antonio
|
May 24 2005, 02:28 PM
|
AMD Phenom II & Intel i7 Overclocker
|
i wanna cry aledi....uwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....   Volt DIMM 3.5v ram temp : Taken wif aerogate sensor stick on the chip.... 37c Ram Cooling : Delta 120mm Fan.... still cannot...damnnn This post has been edited by antonio_zth: May 24 2005, 02:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCcrazy
|
May 24 2005, 02:44 PM
|
|
Antonio, at what speed and timing you get the memtest failed? You should try memtesting stage by stage. 1st stage must be no error run for more than 24 hours, the longer the better. Its a tedious process to begin with..
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-jump
|
May 24 2005, 02:49 PM
|
|
antonio, 200 2-2-3-6 at what vdimm? tried 2-3-3-x?
|
|
|
|
|
|
antonio
|
May 24 2005, 02:53 PM
|
AMD Phenom II & Intel i7 Overclocker
|
QUOTE(PCcrazy @ May 24 2005, 02:44 PM) Antonio, at what speed and timing you get the memtest failed? You should try memtesting stage by stage. 1st stage must be no error run for more than 24 hours, the longer the better. Its a tedious process to begin with.. 200 HTT X 5 = 2000 that speed...stock standard.... QUOTE e-jump Posted Today, 02:49 PM antonio, 200 2-2-3-6 at what vdimm? tried 2-3-3-x? 3.5V nop...havent tried 2 3 3 settings yet...no time lar last week bxz giller... mebbe i wanna burn wif 2.5 3 3 8 @ 2.7v 48Hours lak...see if anything happend....if oso god failed test then RMA....yes yes yeahhhh
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-jump
|
May 24 2005, 03:15 PM
|
|
try ur luck.. as for my dt-d43, 1st time run memtest at 265 3-4-4-10 1T, thousands of errors.. but i let it burn for 10hrs 2nd time try at same setup, 20+error after 12hrs  maybe got time, try 3rd time..mane tau 0 errors  btw, all at 2.8v only... coz epox + booster = kaboom
|
|
|
|
|
|
antonio
|
May 24 2005, 03:27 PM
|
AMD Phenom II & Intel i7 Overclocker
|
dunno...have to see luck oso...maybe if cannot go sent RMA bcoz din wanna do a couple of it by next week....
|
|
|
|
|
|
x714n
|
May 24 2005, 04:28 PM
|
|
try to ask some ocz reps go ask them in xs or bleedinedge they will gladly help you
|
|
|
|
|
|
prancingHORSE
|
May 24 2005, 06:35 PM
|
I’m too awake for this to be a nightmare!
|
6498/6508, this was my old setup. =) running 3.2V.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSdinster
|
May 24 2005, 08:12 PM
|
|
QUOTE(prancingHORSE @ May 24 2005, 06:35 PM) 6498/6508, this was my old setup. =) running 3.2V.  could u pls use the template given ? also perhaps u have a better screenshot ? sooooooooo small.......
|
|
|
|
|