QUOTE(Cottoncandyclouds @ Aug 17 2014, 03:20 PM)
I've published, thank you. Definitions are very important in research.
A personnel is someone involved in an organized undertaking. No part of it's definition limits one's occupation to one function or organizational loyalty (unlike employee). My relationship with her is defined by our visa dealings, therefore, I have every reason to refer to her as a visa personnel in my personal capacity. In my relationship with her, her function does not exceed visa dealings. The word personnel doesn't grant her a specialist status or imply a legal bond with a company.
For example, a volunteer in a soup kitchen can be called a soup kitchen personnel. This might not be her full time job, she might not even be paid, she might actually be here to clean up rubbish. But she is involved in the soup kitchen activity, therefore she can be referred to as a soup kitchen personnel. The core of your argument mostly relates to your subjective perception of the word 'personnel'.
I personally don't understand why are you arguing over menial semantics in such a condescending way. How does this even contribute to the visa discussion, especially when most of us here actually understand what I mean? Why not just google for examples (or even definitions for crying out loud).
It has nothing to do with personnel, but visa...
Indeed, someone working in a soup kitchen is a soup kitchen personnel....
Just as someone working in a clinic is a clinic personnel...
You are not at the clinic to get a visa....
The reason is to point out wrong information and advises given in this forum.....
Lest people start looking for the 'visa personnel' at a 'tb clinic'....
It would have been so much simpler if you just say 'my bad' and move on....