QUOTE(cckkpr @ May 16 2012, 08:59 AM)
I would think that if any straight As students get rejected, it could be there are students better than them ie those with A*. Very little consideration is given on other factors unlike critical courses. It would also be very unlikely for a student with straight A* get rejected from LSE, Warwick or UCL. Someone I know got into civil engineering at UCL with A*AB and another with lesser result into Imperial for biomedical engineering.
there has to be some means for the uni to differentiate that big group of students with aaa....that has been a bone of contention between a level boards and the unis.....the a level results are just NOT helping the unis differentiate students.....hence the recent introduction of the a* grade, in an attempt to sub-stratify the 17% of students with aaa....
many unis use other parameters to select.....oxbridge is well known for disregarding a level results, and have their own exams and interviews....critical courses selection now use standardised tests (ukcat/bmat) and ps/interviews...
for most other unis, and non-critical courses, the a* grading will be a useful addition.....
but i am sure they have their own other criteria for selection...i agree with lightningfist, they will also look at subject combinations, regional applicants, affirmative action (disadvantaged region, comprehensive school etc)...
also, some unis are famous for particular subjects, and getting into such courses can be very competitive....