QUOTE(-kytz- @ Nov 9 2010, 01:48 AM)
Mmm, i guess so, maybe Sandisk SD Ultra II 16GB which cost RM155 should be enoughPhotography Canon S95, replacement for S90
Photography Canon S95, replacement for S90
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 01:54 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
120 posts Joined: Apr 2007 From: Puchong, Selangor Darul Ehsan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 02:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(yeo2007 @ Nov 9 2010, 01:54 AM) Hmm most 16GB cards are around RM120-130, but that card you mentioned is faster than the rest- faster writing speed.Which is better for taking HD videos But better go test out at the shop first lo. I'm actually also planning to get that card when i get my 550D, shooting 1080p at 24fps! This post has been edited by -kytz-: Nov 9 2010, 02:07 AM |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 12:34 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
110 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
After some researching, it comes down to whether to get S95 or Panasonic LX5. It seems Panny is a slightly better low-light camera.
This forumer owns both camera and is a Canon fan but still gred LX5 as giving better pictures quality. But i don't like Panasonic because of the lens cap, slightly bulky. The pro is battery life, 400 pic compare to 200-220 by Canon. "7. Okay now the fun part - image quality. Admittedly, I was hoping that the S95 would win here because I love compact and functional devices - IF they work well. Time after time, the LX3 won out. I believe there might be an AWB issue with the S95. Also, the S95 seems to choose a much higher ISO mode than the LX3. Presumably, the processor is detecting a certain light level and then sets the ISO mode per its programmed algorithm. Why is the S95 choose ISO 1600 when the LX3 is using ISO 400. Even when using the flash, the LX3 chose ISO 80 versus the S95's ISO 250. Seems odd. The LX3 seems to have a much better AWB control. Period. Color quality was the same but the LX3 does have a problem with yellows - especially in Video mode. It doesn't do this all the time with photos - again, an issue of consistency. The LX3 wins hands down however. Despite my best efforts, I just couldn't get the same quality of imagery with the S95". http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp...essage=36324573 http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp...essage=36323973 |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 12:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,586 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: Singapore / Kuching |
What i can say is, S95 and LX5 about the same. But 1 thing pros for S95 is, compact size, easy bring around. For picture quality, i dont know which 1 is better. But since u say LX5 like slightly better, i only can say, how much u pay, how much u get lo due to LX5 exp Rm2-300 than S95...
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 01:54 PM
|
|
VIP
23,414 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taipei |
QUOTE(SingTime @ Nov 9 2010, 12:34 PM) After some researching, it comes down to whether to get S95 or Panasonic LX5. It seems Panny is a slightly better low-light camera. It's not even an issue... it's just different school of thought for auto ISO selection. Both have their pro's and con's. Perhaps LX3's algorithm choose ISO400 as higher values gives noisier jpegs.This forumer owns both camera and is a Canon fan but still gred LX5 as giving better pictures quality. But i don't like Panasonic because of the lens cap, slightly bulky. The pro is battery life, 400 pic compare to 200-220 by Canon. "7. Okay now the fun part - image quality. Admittedly, I was hoping that the S95 would win here because I love compact and functional devices - IF they work well. Time after time, the LX3 won out. I believe there might be an AWB issue with the S95. Also, the S95 seems to choose a much higher ISO mode than the LX3. Presumably, the processor is detecting a certain light level and then sets the ISO mode per its programmed algorithm. Why is the S95 choose ISO 1600 when the LX3 is using ISO 400. Even when using the flash, the LX3 chose ISO 80 versus the S95's ISO 250. Seems odd. The LX3 seems to have a much better AWB control. Period. Color quality was the same but the LX3 does have a problem with yellows - especially in Video mode. It doesn't do this all the time with photos - again, an issue of consistency. The LX3 wins hands down however. Despite my best efforts, I just couldn't get the same quality of imagery with the S95". » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Either ways, you can always select your own ISO speed and I do agree that between these "enthuasiast" compacts.. there's really nothing significantly different between them in image quality. |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 04:01 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
39 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(jchong @ Oct 24 2010, 10:05 AM) I agree with your points. I also made the same comparison when deciding between S95 and LX5. hello,Pricewise I got my S95 for RM1,259 (package with 4GB SDHC, Canon pouch, mini tripod, screen protector). Actually NEX3 uses APS sensor (even bigger than micro 4/3). can i now which shop u buy for tis price? please pm me the shop name & location pls? grace_lkm@hotmail.com tq |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 01:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,989 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2010, 03:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,866 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Klang |
QUOTE(jchong @ Nov 10 2010, 01:50 PM) I bought it from Digital Mall, PJ. It's the kiosk on 1st floor. Just back from Hong Kong this morning,The seller is also a LYN member under the name skydrake. You can pm him too. aiyo...mana ada cheap so far i find many is range HKD 3000-3400 and the international warranty is 6-12month oni might as well get in Malaysia bro, i wan skydrake contact oso.. |
|
|
Nov 11 2010, 03:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,586 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: Singapore / Kuching |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2010, 03:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,989 posts Joined: Nov 2005 |
QUOTE(Liuism @ Nov 11 2010, 03:17 PM) Just check his thread: http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=1226457 |
|
|
Nov 11 2010, 06:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,866 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Klang |
QUOTE(ic3rock @ Nov 11 2010, 03:33 PM) macpro2 brother said wan.QUOTE Just check his thread: http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=1226457 thanks |
|
|
Nov 12 2010, 07:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
521 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Ipoh, Perak |
Just bought one for my friend this afternoon
RM1259 |
|
|
Nov 13 2010, 12:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,293 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Ladang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2010, 01:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
521 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Ipoh, Perak |
|
|
|
Nov 14 2010, 01:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
816 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(zhengyang89 @ Nov 13 2010, 01:04 AM) I bought from him yesterday too...1259. I add on original battery 150 + front lens protector RM 80 In Melaka, everyone is selling RRP. The lowest is 1380 ... sigh .. Going to play with the night shots |
|
|
Nov 15 2010, 05:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,866 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Klang |
|
|
|
Nov 15 2010, 10:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
762 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: ~ ipOh mAli ~ |
Ask for some opinions here. LX5 n S95... which one better in low light (nite shots) and better picture quality ?
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 05:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
885 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
btw ppl, did u guys get ur memory card as SD or microSD with adapter?
'cause I asked skydrake and he told me microSD+adapter is unstable... issit true? personally i think it's not true coz it's just pins extensions and i've been using this config wif my S90... |
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 08:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,883 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(SingTime @ Nov 9 2010, 12:34 PM) After some researching, it comes down to whether to get S95 or Panasonic LX5. It seems Panny is a slightly better low-light camera. i was once stuck in the same situation as yours. but i choose s95 in the end. why? compactness. the reason i need another device in my pocket all the time is to capture anything while i was out anytime. my phone camera aint that good and fails me most of the time. so i decided to buy a compact that wud suit my needs. firstly, my choice was lx5>s95. i did some researches and still i feel like buying the lx5. but then,when i finally decided to try both of the cams at a shop, i ended up with s95. why? cuz the lx5 was too big for me, with its lens cap, it couldnt fit my jeans. and if i were to carry a slightly bigger camera+a bag of its own,(since it cant fit in my jeans) i might as well carry my dlsr. and since that day, the s95 never fails me This forumer owns both camera and is a Canon fan but still gred LX5 as giving better pictures quality. But i don't like Panasonic because of the lens cap, slightly bulky. The pro is battery life, 400 pic compare to 200-220 by Canon. "7. Okay now the fun part - image quality. Admittedly, I was hoping that the S95 would win here because I love compact and functional devices - IF they work well. Time after time, the LX3 won out. I believe there might be an AWB issue with the S95. Also, the S95 seems to choose a much higher ISO mode than the LX3. Presumably, the processor is detecting a certain light level and then sets the ISO mode per its programmed algorithm. Why is the S95 choose ISO 1600 when the LX3 is using ISO 400. Even when using the flash, the LX3 chose ISO 80 versus the S95's ISO 250. Seems odd. The LX3 seems to have a much better AWB control. Period. Color quality was the same but the LX3 does have a problem with yellows - especially in Video mode. It doesn't do this all the time with photos - again, an issue of consistency. The LX3 wins hands down however. Despite my best efforts, I just couldn't get the same quality of imagery with the S95". http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp...essage=36324573 http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp...essage=36323973 |
|
|
Nov 21 2010, 04:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
354 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: seri kembangan |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() canon S95 night shot. |
| Change to: | 0.3415sec
0.46
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 09:41 PM |