QUOTE(sonyman @ Oct 10 2010, 11:30 PM)
well i took the polo in 222 for a spin today... the red one. First impression. very nice looking car from outside. Driver side interior looks the same as golf. when looking at the aircond knob. Ai ya... manual leh.. put off liau... then no traction control. and very very basic. Fit and finish not as nice as golf from germany. But very much better than Japanese cars. Space. very very cramp. feels like sitting in a kancil or myvi. Back sit. seriously not comfortable. Driver seat ok. So comfort i feel very very poor. Boot space., seriously small. very very small, not joking go see yourself.
Engine... small but seriously powerful. dont look at 1.2cc ah... it flies very very well. A bit of a lag under 2k rpm. but after that it just goes. DSG nothing to say lah same like golf. only without paddle shits.
But in the end went to lancer next door. sat in the EX,,, the seat feels so much more comfortable than the polo. And size so much bigger.. now the question is. is it worth to pay for the engine and gear box while sacrificing all the comfort and space? Polo or VW seriously know how to make a very very good engine and gearbox. At 110k i think i have to review my choices.
To axel. have you taken the polo for a spin. My backs not feeling very comfortable you know. just a mere 15 min drive around.
Not yet bro...
I also suspect that the seats won't be as comfy.. the Golf seats were slightly above average and the Beetle seats were much more comfy than the Golf. I've yet to take it for a spin.. wanna wait for the new Rocco to be out before I give the sales people a call then test both.
Definitely the Lancer would be more comfy! hehe... but I didn't quite like the Lancer's interior.. the plastic dashboard kinda cheap looking

Added on October 11, 2010, 10:45 amQUOTE(sonyman @ Oct 10 2010, 11:30 PM)
well i took the polo in 222 for a spin today... the red one. First impression. very nice looking car from outside. Driver side interior looks the same as golf. when looking at the aircond knob. Ai ya... manual leh.. put off liau... then no traction control. and very very basic. Fit and finish not as nice as golf from germany. But very much better than Japanese cars. Space. very very cramp. feels like sitting in a kancil or myvi. Back sit. seriously not comfortable. Driver seat ok. So comfort i feel very very poor. Boot space., seriously small. very very small, not joking go see yourself.
Engine... small but seriously powerful. dont look at 1.2cc ah... it flies very very well. A bit of a lag under 2k rpm. but after that it just goes. DSG nothing to say lah same like golf. only without paddle shits.
But in the end went to lancer next door. sat in the EX,,, the seat feels so much more comfortable than the polo. And size so much bigger.. now the question is. is it worth to pay for the engine and gear box while sacrificing all the comfort and space? Polo or VW seriously know how to make a very very good engine and gearbox. At 110k i think i have to review my choices.
To axel. have you taken the polo for a spin. My backs not feeling very comfortable you know. just a mere 15 min drive around.
Not yet bro...
I also suspect that the seats won't be as comfy.. the Golf seats were slightly above average and the Beetle seats were much more comfy than the Golf. I've yet to take it for a spin.. wanna wait for the new Rocco to be out before I give the sales people a call then test both.
Definitely the Lancer would be more comfy! hehe... but I didn't quite like the Lancer's interior.. the plastic dashboard kinda cheap looking
This post has been edited by azxel: Oct 11 2010, 10:45 AM