QUOTE(isaacmiranda7 @ Jul 13 2010, 06:58 PM)
Welcome aboard Photography Nikon D90 V8, Nikon mid-high range DSLR
Photography Nikon D90 V8, Nikon mid-high range DSLR
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 07:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 07:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,889 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Kuala Lumpur |
I think I will
My first DSLR after two digital cameras... Sigh. Anything I have to look out for with this little baby? |
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 07:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
629 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
little? I wouldn't call D90 little... lol
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 07:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 07:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
824 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: KL |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jul 13 2010, 06:34 PM) Histogram only serve as a guide, any clipping on either edges means there is lost details due to shadows or highlights. But of course, there is no histogram that will suite all images. It depends on what you want highlight preview?I usually use highlight preview to see if I've blown any or not. |
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 07:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
The preview where it will show overexposed parts in the preview.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 07:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,538 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 08:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
Just wondering, 70-300mm VR suitable to use as potrait image or not? Don't have the $$$ for 70-200mm VR lol
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 08:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 08:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
629 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
50mm f/1.4 at f/2.0 i heard as sharp as macro lens
planning to get 1 somewhere in oct - nov This post has been edited by SoLiD: Jul 13 2010, 08:44 PM |
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 08:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jul 13 2010, 07:34 PM) then D5000 is little D90? QUOTE(Bliz @ Jul 13 2010, 08:31 PM) Just wondering, 70-300mm VR suitable to use as potrait image or not? Don't have the $$$ for 70-200mm VR lol y not? even UWA, macro, or super telephoto lenses cab be use as portrait lensthere's no reli specific portrait lens, its up to ppl's preference QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Jul 13 2010, 08:36 PM) 50 f/1.4 @ f/2.8 is way sharper than 70-200 @ f/2.8 i guess@ f/1.4 vs 70-200 @ f/2.8 then im dun thk so... |
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 09:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 09:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,338 posts Joined: Jun 2008 From: kuala lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 09:25 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu |
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 09:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Jul 13 2010, 08:49 PM) then D5000 is little D90? Frankly, I don't see if the 50mm f/1.4 @ f/2.8 is sharper than the 70-200 at f/2.8 or not. LOL, can't see the differences. But one thing, the 70-200's color is superior y not? even UWA, macro, or super telephoto lenses cab be use as portrait lens there's no reli specific portrait lens, its up to ppl's preference 50 f/1.4 @ f/2.8 is way sharper than 70-200 @ f/2.8 i guess @ f/1.4 vs 70-200 @ f/2.8 then im dun thk so... Sharpness, you may see my pics ![]() Wide lens for portrait |
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 09:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
629 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
ooo buy AF-D or AF-G?
no money la T.T now in internship..collecting money.. |
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 09:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jul 13 2010, 09:28 PM) Frankly, I don't see if the 50mm f/1.4 @ f/2.8 is sharper than the 70-200 at f/2.8 or not. LOL, can't see the differences. But one thing, the 70-200's color is superior Your 70-200mm is super duper sharp already, even wide open Sharpness, you may see my pics ![]() Wide lens for portrait |
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 09:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
^ that pic is 16-35 f/4 xD.
|
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 10:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,508 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jul 13 2010, 09:28 PM) Frankly, I don't see if the 50mm f/1.4 @ f/2.8 is sharper than the 70-200 at f/2.8 or not. LOL, can't see the differences. But one thing, the 70-200's color is superior i dunno oso, jz base my guess on normally, "normally" i meant, primes r sharper than zoomsSharpness, you may see my pics » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Wide lens for portrait QUOTE(SoLiD @ Jul 13 2010, 09:29 PM) dun get AF-G, very racist lens |
|
|
Jul 13 2010, 10:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
375 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: /k/ |
noob question..what the different between D n G
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0228sec
0.61
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 10:22 AM |