not sure either marketing psychology or yet be true..
maxis will use unifi website as the infra is from them.
they share the same infra to run fibre to home

Guys, what is this.. please tell that is not true

http://updated.internalinsider.info/index....ifi-usage-quota

Latest UniFi Coverage @ Seremban, NS. Based on UniFi Customer Portal. Interested? Just PM me

BANDAR SEREMBAN SELATAN
BOURGAINVILLEA
BUKIT KELANA
BUKIT MARGOSA
KAMPUNG PAROI
KAMPUNG TOK DAGANG
KIAMBANG INDAH
MELATI INDAH
NEGERI AMPANGAN
SRI NEGERI
SRI SENAWANG INDUSTRIAL CENTRE BT 4 1/2
TAIPAN SENAWANG
TAMAN AMPANGAN
TAMAN BANDAR SENAWANG
TAMAN BUKIT EMAS
TAMAN BUKTI
TAMAN BUKTI SETIA
TAMAN CENGAL UTAMA
TAMAN DESA DURANTA
TAMAN DESA ROS
TAMAN GURU
TAMAN KOMERSIAL SENAWANG
TAMAN KUDIN
TAMAN LAVENDER HEIGHTS
TAMAN PANCHOR JAYA FASA 5
TAMAN PANCHOR JAYA FASA 6
TAMAN PAROI
TAMAN PAROI JAYA
TAMAN PINGGIRAN GOLF
TAMAN SENANGIN
TAMAN SEREMBAN JAYA
TAMAN SETIA HATI
TAMAN SRI SIANTAN
TAMAN TASIK JAYA
TAMAN TUANKU JAAFAR
TMN PANCHOR JAYA FASA 3
TMN PANCHOR JAYA FASA 4

There's good proof. Internet connectivity in both Penang and Klang Valley is ahead of the rest of the country.

Both are opposition states. They have better agreement with alternative telcos and fairer policies.

How long for them to act on a demand list request?

I live in Bukit Rasah Seremban. Not only am I unable to subscribe Unifi, but I can't apply for Streamyx 4mbps because not supported. Stuck with 1mbps. Anything can I do to get TM off their butts?

Local network traffic is capped at 100mbps.

Local network can be anything from your intranet access, locally hosted landing site(similar to the first page Maxis redirects you) when you use prepaid, SP Pirate FTP site, IPTV or local video stream sites hosted by the town municipal council itself.

However I don't think they are implementing all of those. Local network in their case is the physical line rental.
Like you need to rent a phone line before subscribing Streamyx or pay extra ISP charges for dialup - (Standard Line rental(circuit charges) + ISP).

The ISP price plans might have already included the rental all in 1 bill, so you don't have to pay 2 separate bills.

Here're more insights for the previous HSBB contract awarded by our Government MCMC Dept.

Source of article taken from Malaysia Alternative Voices.
http://malaysiavoices.blogspot.nl/2008/09/rm-11.html

There were actually 3 proposals which got to the final stage of consideration before the Government insisted on awarding the RM11.3billion HSBB project to TM and taking out RM2.4billion to subsidize the project from tax payers money.

The 3 proposals were:

1) TM with its HSBB Draft
Funding source: Private with RM2.4billion subsidy from Government. TM owns and operate the entire network and they can choose to sell wholesale services to other ISPs.

2) HSBT Draft
Funding source: Totally private with  Pahang government having a 20% stake in HSBT via its wholly owned subsidiary, Pahang Technology Resources.  Main source of funding would be its strategic partners, while the rest would be raised from sukuk and other forms of funding.

3) Jaring's then CEO Dr Mohamed Awang Lah Draft
Establishing a neutral infrastructure company that owns a fiber optic backbone network throughout the country that will cut the total HSBB cost by 80% savings.
This is pretty much a "FTTN" network which wire up fibre optic to streets and then ISPs can lease them for their own FTTC/FTTB cabinets, LTE wireless base stations, or last mile FTTH etc. ISPs can save on laying their own fibre optic network throughout the country only for their own sole use. This is what Time is doing to bring their FTTh netowkr to multi dwelling buildings.
Funding source:
Can be private or government funded tapping from the USP fund.

Eventually, both 2nd and 3rd suggestions were ignored and lost their bid to Option 1 from TM.

The HSBT tender lost on the basis that it was introduced late to the table but as you know, they came out with a plan which could save the government RM2.4billion. Should they be given a chance?
That's RM2.4billion couldn't it justify for just a late entry, that's plenty of money to be saved!

As for Jaring's CEO suggestion, his idea was also shoved into the bin for the basis that it couldn't gave a steady income stream for the TM monopoly. TM argued that they were the best player to own and operate the public network and they can always sell wholesale services to other ISPS.

ade satu bro rumah kat taman england dapat.maybe rumah kroni   

cube check kat coverage unifi nye website

Now is 0 entry for Unifi. Hot promotion.

Want to know your area available for Unifi? Just PM me your full address I will back to you as soon as possible.

Just PM me if you have any question about Unifi Coverage and Registration.