Agreed...and two rising youngsters...Tore and Lalkovic...

I think esca_flo countered the argument by maxburnz

Silva went to MC liao...

Anyone got the Season Review yet? RM24.90 DVD available at Speedy Videos. Absolute keeper, esp it's our Double season. Class.

+1

GOING TO GET THEM!

Just got it! Superb commentary and well, its our double!!! Really sad looking to our defeat against Inter though.

well, i'm waiting for the Blues's friendly match.

I think it's fair to say that he doesn't worth 100m that much especially when he had a pretty poor run in World Cup.The price slapped on him was merely a move to prevent other clubs to bid for him.Anyway,I think 30m is a little too little for a player of his calibre.That's my opinion.

Look like New Droigba on the SB tour..hahahah

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/...lues-shirt.html

Yeah!!

just come back from london trip .. went to stamford bridge for 2 hours visit ... if u want to buy jersey dont go to stamford bridge to buy ... i bought one 43 pounds there .. and i bought another one at sportingdirects (largest sports chain) for only 35 pounds ..

will share some photos ...

i guess...its usual..there ...price will pricier then outside for same quality...maybe the feeling is different..

---

Added on July 13, 2010, 11:39 pmcant wait for this fellow...

youtube

This post has been edited by krk24: Jul 13 2010, 11:44 PM

i still excited about Sturridge and Borini..even with the maybe signing of Torres and Aguero...

its because chelsea dont need silva.silva already stated he'll go to chelsea if they want him.

right now.i like chelsea to take the risk this season.let play with the same team.1 or 2 players add in.let put more youth player from our academy in.

if RA really want the CL.then i assure u we cant beat barca with the current crops

OMG. I am gonna request it as my bday gift

yes, there is no doubt torres is one very very dangerous hitman. but who wants a player that can only play half a season? and that much money? i dont think so.

i'd pay 35m for torres at most.

Lukaku pls come here....plsss.....

35MIL too much bro...go for between 20-30MILL...cuz torres since last year seems to be injury prone player...no need to splash the cash as we did for sheva..

thats not the point of my post , the point is , in the news , he was about to sign with chelsea , and yet again another robinho done by mancity . pls la when reply my post , dont la go reply like no brain bro.... sorry moody mood today. peace

What worry me most was our midfield. We lost 3 experience player DECO, BALLACK, J.COLE and fullback BELLETTI. Our squad depth was significantly reduce. If LAMPARD and MALOUDA is out injured, no doubt MIKEL or MATIC can do a decent job but we lost the creative force to open up defense. But if CA is ready to give our youngster a chance then i will have no complain even if there is no more further signing.

Looking at the only new signing we have now, looks like CA might try 442 diamond again.

CECH
IVA TERRY CARV COLE
ESSIEN
LAMP MALOUDA
BENNY
DROG ANELKA


TORRES ? AGUERO ? LUKAKU ? i will pick LUKAKU > AGUERO > then only TORRES. LUKAKU and AGUERO have clearly stated they would like to play for us and due to their young age they can afford the time to stay 3rd choice striker. TORRES is overprice, some sort injury prone, just wanna find a way out of LIVERPOOL, having 3 star striker and 1 on the bench is gonna have conflict. But of course TORRES will be the safest buy since he have proven good scoring record in EPL already.