Trust me, the size is just nice. Not heavy and bulky unlike The Brick. Best EFS lens!

Dangerous lo like this...
If strap got snapped off, whole bag falls on ground.
Stick to Crumpler then...
OK OK...
Erm... Like this I have no more question to ask in Canon thread already, can't afford Canon stuffs.
My Tammy stuff gotta ask in 3rd party lenses thread....

i am going a damned stupid question, i think

well,

can anyone tell me for the 100mm f/2.8 L,

if i want to take the full plate of my food (normal size plate), what must be the minimum distance of the front of my lens to the plate ar?

for 50mm, the mfd is too long to my liking as i need to back up before it can focus.

and although the 100mm can focus at a nearer distance, but i sked it will be too long for me pulak @@

how how?

anyone with it can tell me? haha....i don't need 1:1 magnification la for food, just that if i get that, and when go out i no need bring so many lens ma if i want light

PS: bringing a plate of CKT to camera shop is not a good idea, haha

yea, some suggested the 60mm to me

but i want the IS, will use it as portrait and some macro, and 60mm working distance for macro too short liao oso

actually i oso want the red ring LOL

i see....yea, thats what i think so too

although not every food need to take whole plate la....but sometimes when at hawker area, wan change lens susah oso lol

thanks. yea, that lens works fine for me most of the time, as i bought it mainly because of it MFD lol

just that i am thinking, with the help of IS, mayb sometimes i dont need flash ma as i can take at maybe 1/10 like that

but of coz if buy liao then can play macro and portrait also , however hm....hm....hmm.....

if u take food usually why buy the 17-40 before leh ?

7MDH got clone?? Where to get that??

DSLR is the new PnS.

This Friday and weekend will be in Malacca, the place which I was for my tertiary studies. Feel so nostalgic.

Can snap a lot of photos, hopefully. Well, just hope that my friend will bring me to those tourist destinations though I have been for many times already.

The limitation comes when I visit the Jonker Street at night, surely kong case when I dislike to flash my flash light there. Everyone will be giving me a stern look...

hi there.
just to check. i know filters is important for protecting lenses s well as give nicer colours right?
after checking, most shop dun give filter (or give very cheap filters) for 550D kits.
may i know if those filters is sufficient? or can you kindly advice which filter should i opt for?

Bang, gambar bising la.
Light travelling.
I think I'll borrow my friend's tripod since she has a DSLR too (most of her gadgets are poisoned by me, I keep asking her to buy, buy, buy!)
Since she doesn't have 55-250mm, I think I'll bring that lens only, others will borrow from her. She went and bought 75-300mm and obviously cursed like hell...
goldfries' latest blog entry mentions that those people still can't call themselves a photographer yet.

sis..=) dun always poison ur fren lar. scared being ur fren later =p hahahah.
i'm gonna get the 550D 18-135mm  (should get filter for it rite?)

previously, pengster mentioned Hoya HD (HD=wat ar?) and (B+W XS-Pro Mrc),-- this a brand or the whole product name?
for eg : i just tell the shop person i wanted Hoya / B+W? they'll ask about the UV level one right?
can advice me the minimum requirement and about how much?

budget of RM150+- enuff??

OooO So desu. tq tq    will go find this Hoya Pro1D UV 67mm
so this one is more than enough for me right? i dun mind topping a little if needed....
but if sufficient, i guess i'll settle for it.
then as per sister fruitie mentioned, the 50mm f1.8 punya no need filter lar hor?
i planning to get that lens also.. cos seemed people saya that lens punya bokeh nice n this lens is affordable. =)

tat rm300 lens no need protection wan la..
buy expensive then not worth,
buy cheapo but IQ kena degrade a lot.
so go filterless ftw

To me, Facebook has degraded the quality...

hye all..
kinnda stuck over here between 450d,500d and 550d..

emm..
before this, i want to buy 450d..
but when ive done some survey,it seems that the price different between 450d and 500d are not so huge..
RM300++ like that..
and for that price difference,u can have a dslr with movie recording capabilties..
to be frank,ive played already with my fren 500d and kinda like it a bit(eventhough picture that was taken by me using this camera was so rubbish..haha)

well..
as far as i know,500d uses the lates sensor (digic 4) while 450d (digic 3)

is there any different between these two sensors in terms of image quality??

as for 550d which much more superior than these two cameras,how about the image quality compare to 500d???

is it worth for that extra bucks different frm 500d to 550d??
im ot so into video recording at all..

p/s-dont advise me to get 50d and above..haha

haha..
my bad...
so..
newer technology means better image quality isn'it??

Not a problem la.
My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicolepang/

Only see those recent added photos ya, from May 2010 one.
Others old photos all seem tak boleh pakai la. That time still noob back in 2008.

Yes, I did but I set the reduction to the lowest, so only a bit la.
Actually on small sized photo, it is still not so obvious.