no egg no chicken, no chicken no egg, at the 1st, GOd produce a chicken 1st to the world, then oni come with egg~ i think so ~

I don't think so. If there is a god, he would have produced an egg first. Why? Because there is a process involves from an egg to a chicken. So a fully formed chicken has "less information" that an egg. Since an egg is more powerful than a chicken, definitely a god created a chicken is less powerful than a god created an egg and you can't have that, can you?

sounds logical 2me:P

chciken comes first u fool. Study your bible. In the first day God create light then few days later the animals and stuff. God wouldnt be so dumb to create an egg and risk being step over by other animals. Waste of effort. A wiser choice will be to create a chicken directly and let it develop.

Chicken come 1st la... without chicken hw can the egg hatch ? =.=

did god just create sperm and the egg ? nop he created humans =D so chicken got the be the correct answer =)

---

Added on May 11, 2010, 9:45 amtotally agree =D




This post has been edited by jarod89: May 11 2010, 09:45 AM

please keep religious opinion out of this thread,this thread is about zoology,which is a branch of life sciences,religious information is definitely not part of it,so behave yourselves...

The eggplant came first

Good reasoning...

Now... r we gonna discuss about origin of human too?

The eggplant!

The egg comes first. Simple. The not-so-chicken laid a mutated egg which becomes a chicken.

been resisting for so long....

actually.....








the cock comes 1st *barumbum*

um...not funny.

pleaase la.. this is not a funny thread.. please give your professional opinion

scientific and logic opinion agrees that the egg comes before the chicken.

creationist as per usual hold out that chicken must be created first.

whats there to discuss?

Both of ur main point is debatable provided only if god is PROVEN to be exist, which is in the other thread.
Of course according to the bible we dont need egg to produce chicken, only need god's hand to bring chickens out

If we think in scientific perspective, we can assume that egg come first.
Since dinosaur do produce eggs, it is not entirely impossible that evolution/devolution of dinosaur produce the first chicken in the world
Of course, this is just assumption

you guys are blinded with 'chicken' and 'egg', the true question to this should be, are we born.. or are we made?

the simple answer is, both questions have their own answer..., not one.

---

Added on May 13, 2010, 6:38 pmand there is another question from that also..., is the chicken male or female? ><... and which one first??

This post has been edited by eone: May 13 2010, 06:38 PM

obviously we are born into this world, i have not seen a "made" human.

interesting, whatever it is, the chicken must come to this world as a pair, male and female. and surely its impossible for egg comes first

err, where is evolutionist?

---

Added on May 15, 2010, 11:26 pmbut , we are created at the first place right? same case as chicken, i just thinking that for some reason, we must came to this world by pair.

btw, why humans not lay egg? (obviously question for evolutionist )

---

Added on May 15, 2010, 11:28 pmsome more question, how does chicken come to this world .why you are considering egg to come to this world at the first place?

This post has been edited by azerroes: May 15 2010, 11:29 PM

aiyaaaaaa..you ahhhhhhhhhh

in the very beginning there was chinese and indian. chinese married indian. come out baby is chindian. where got need chindian pair to create chindian baby wan?

sweat betul u.

not that good of an analogy teongpeng,.....but still there's something to learn from it...

evolution can occur through small changes and changes is small enough that there can be interbreeding between chicken and pre-chicken

also.....the difference in definition of variety and species there's still gray areas....

eg: Saint Bernards and Chihuahuas
if you put them together, they are unlikely to interbreed between the 2 variety of dog due to huge difference in size although breeding can be done artificially....
so species : natural classification or artificial? same goes for variety....
so sometimes it is hard to say that 1 is a new species