Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Zoology Which Comes First?, Chicken or Egg?
|
CleverDick
|
 May 10 2010, 11:58 AM
|
|
QUOTE(anti-informatic @ May 10 2010, 12:52 AM) Its 12.47am now so my mind abit....not so blur, so i might misunderstood ur concept here Anyway, to the bold part If u use the concept of iron piece and iron hammer, the source of origin would be from the nature However if we back to the topic, we will still loop back to the question: "Where the egg comes from?" or to my question: "What is the source of origin of an egg?" the article neoengsheng posted recently has given a very logical answer,scroll up and read it... QUOTE Ya, according to the theory of universe existence
Just a theory thru Scientific theory differs from the word 'theory' that we normally used in daily life to denote something whose validity remains unknown,it's been subjected to numerous validations and the evidences found are in support of it... http://chemistry.about.com/od/chemistry101/a/lawtheory.htmThis post has been edited by CleverDick: May 10 2010, 04:05 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
CleverDick
|
May 11 2010, 12:09 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(f4tE @ May 11 2010, 07:21 AM) chciken comes first u fool. Study your bible. In the first day God create light then few days later the animals and stuff. God wouldnt be so dumb to create an egg and risk being step over by other animals. Waste of effort. A wiser choice will be to create a chicken directly and let it develop. QUOTE(jarod89 @ May 11 2010, 09:44 AM) Chicken come 1st la... without chicken hw can the egg hatch ? =.= did god just create sperm and the egg ? nop he created humans =D so chicken got the be the correct answer =)
Added on May 11, 2010, 9:45 amtotally agree =D please keep religious opinion out of this thread,this thread is about zoology,which is a branch of life sciences,religious information is definitely not part of it,so behave yourselves... |
|
|
|
|
|
CleverDick
|
May 16 2010, 02:44 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(azerroes @ May 16 2010, 02:37 AM) wow, im impressed by the selection of naturals  .but human laying egg is not a bad idea though. how can we suggest to the naturals  but why there is only 2 kinds of gender : male and female  . i also wonder if we do got a species, but with the absence of the other gender,will the species will extinct?   No, it won't, there's a form of reproduction called parthenogenesis in which only one gender is required to reproduce, New Mexico whiptail for example has been documented to having exclusively females in the entire population, it reproduces solely through parthenogenesis... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cnemidophorus_neomexicanusThis post has been edited by CleverDick: Aug 18 2010, 01:10 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
CleverDick
|
May 16 2010, 03:10 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(azerroes @ May 16 2010, 03:06 AM) at the end, its only a combination of male and female. still 2 gender wow, i never knew that. to prevent a species to extinct is this way. how can we make the creature turn to produce this way asexual has no gender, not two genders, and the example of parthenogenesis that i gave appears to have arisen naturally through the cross breeding of two distinct species, god has not been observed to play any significant role in the process... QUOTE btw, you make me more and more impressed on God creations. its just mind-blowing and surprising. and it just make me more deeply believe to my God  . thanks fella  you're welcome, if thinking this way makes you happier, go ahead... This post has been edited by CleverDick: Aug 18 2010, 01:09 AM |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0223sec
0.62
6 queries
GZIP Disabled