Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Add Reply RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Zoology Which Comes First?, Chicken or Egg?

views
     
azerroes
post May 15 2010, 11:23 PM

No sorcery lies beyond my grasp
******
Senior Member
1,105 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
interesting, whatever it is, the chicken must come to this world as a pair, male and female. and surely its impossible for egg comes first laugh.gif

err, where is evolutionist? rolleyes.gif whistling.gif

Added on May 15, 2010, 11:26 pm
QUOTE(SpikeMarlene @ May 14 2010, 03:53 PM)
obviously we are born into this world, i have not seen a "made" human.
*
but , we are created at the first place right? hmm.gif same case as chicken, i just thinking that for some reason, we must came to this world by pair.

btw, why humans not lay egg? brows.gif (obviously question for evolutionist tongue.gif )

Added on May 15, 2010, 11:28 pm
QUOTE(furryfluffy @ May 8 2010, 03:54 PM)
Which comes first?

Chicken or Egg?

In my humble opinion, chicken came first.

If the egg came first...

...When predator step on it, it will be damaged & no chick to hatch.
...When predator wanna eat it, egg cant protect itself & hence no chick to hatch.

If chicken, at least dinosaur chase it, it can run.

Furthermore, it is during the life cycle of the chicken that evolution & adaptation to its surrounding that make the chicken improve & changes it's DNA to suit the environment for the next coming generation.

Then only 2 chicken mate & produce egg .

What do you think?

tq.
*
some more question, how does chicken come to this world hmm.gif .why you are considering egg to come to this world at the first place?

This post has been edited by azerroes: May 15 2010, 11:29 PM
azerroes
post May 16 2010, 02:37 AM

No sorcery lies beyond my grasp
******
Senior Member
1,105 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(lin00b @ May 16 2010, 01:41 AM)
wrong.
internal fertilization and gestation (eg. give birth) has a higher survival rate compared to external fertilization (eg. fish) and external gestation (eg. eggs)

species that do internal gestation (most mammals) only exist later and is more evolutionary advanced.

to preempt the most common follow-up question of "then why dont chicken give birth if its much better?" - because laying eggs still works well enough for that level of existence.
*
wow, im impressed by the selection of naturals rclxms.gif .but human laying egg is not a bad idea though. how can we suggest to the naturals laugh.gif

but why there is only 2 kinds of gender : male and female hmm.gif .

i also wonder if we do got a species, but with the absence of the other gender,will the species extinct? rolleyes.gif hmm.gif whistling.gif

This post has been edited by azerroes: May 16 2010, 03:00 AM
azerroes
post May 16 2010, 03:06 AM

No sorcery lies beyond my grasp
******
Senior Member
1,105 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(slimey @ May 16 2010, 02:43 AM)
there are hermaphrodites in nature also asexual also
*
at the end, its only a combination of male and female. still 2 gender

QUOTE(CleverDick @ May 16 2010, 02:44 AM)
No,it won't,there's a form of reproduction called parthenogenesis in which only one gender is required to reproduce,New Mexico whiptail for example has been documented to having exclusively females in the entire population,it reproduces solely through parthenogenesis...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cnemidophorus_neomexicanus
*
wow, i never knew that. to prevent a species to extinct is this way. how can we make the creature turn to produce this way laugh.gif

btw, you make me more and more impressed on God creations. its just mind-blowing and surprising. and it just make me more deeply believe to my God notworthy.gif . thanks fella icon_rolleyes.gif
azerroes
post May 16 2010, 03:21 AM

No sorcery lies beyond my grasp
******
Senior Member
1,105 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
relate it to the topic, i wonder how much i impressed with the wisdom of God. still i can say that this chicken-egg thing is in the God knowledge. so powerful that He can make sea creature that have a body like fish give birth eg. whale.

to many things that i see in the world that i just assume its the will and power of god to determine it.

face it, we need the other gender ( not to mention i thank god for creating the other gender laugh.gif )

Added on May 16, 2010, 3:24 am
QUOTE(slimey @ May 16 2010, 03:11 AM)
hermaphrodite is not 2 gender....just an organism with both male and female reproductive organ allowing reproduction with just 1 parent
*
can you please understand my statement? is it possible for me to suggest the THIRD gender for human? currently we have male and female. so i want more. can or not? cool2.gif

This post has been edited by azerroes: May 16 2010, 03:24 AM
« Next Oldest · PhD School · Next Newest »
 

Add ReplyOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0158sec    1.17    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 06:38 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.