arrived, william, finejava, eddybeh, wingster

I'll be there! Mo0 fetching me

Yup but onoce again. Will be late abit yea. ):

aiyo...my sister still got half a plate...

---

Added on May 13, 2010, 8:04 pmdunno got chance meet u or not

This post has been edited by zstan: May 13 2010, 08:04 PM

I think got chance. Cause I'll be there 9ish.

Up to Mo0.

Cannot miss me, my mohawk stands out

so wanna be there to try all the poison~

My poison = Compact camera

all go out TT...very cold now!!

bro, so u are susgesting either a230 or a330 rather than d3000? because i heard sony dslr is better for lower range ones. dont know how true it is

Just finished painting my pondok. Gonna mandi now n come over. Shud b there at about 9.45

i find d3000 unappealing... same goes with the a230...

a230 and a330 are small DSLRs.. so grip-wise if ur hands are big, wont be tooooo comfortable.

Here's what I mean by nicer color if I set the ISO to 200 or 400 instead of letting it shoot at AUTO ISO.

At ISO 200 or 400, the flash will be powerful while at auto, the flash will be weaker (ISO usually ranging from 800-1200 for my Tamron 1750)



2 pictures, taken consecutively. Basically, snap, change Iso to 400, snap.....

Left picture, ISO set to auto.
- Iso auto to 800
- Flash - weak

Right picture, ISO set to 400.
- Iso 400
- Flash - stronger

No other settings were changed (Even the WB for both was registered as AUTO (0).)

See the colour difference? Why the better colour with lower iso?

Note : Oh ya, forgot. Flash is F20 but same effect if using my F58.

This post has been edited by kmarc: May 13 2010, 09:26 PM

interesting comparison...but i never use Auto ISO no matter on flash anot....for capturing more ambient light i will use higher ISO and the color is no difference with low ISO...
while low ISO with flash will underexposed the shots....of coz u can always change the flash compensation urself to suit ur needs...

i just answered kmarc privately.. but i will still tell why

the reason first picture appear a little blue is because
metaphor: the florescent in the room fires at 100%, at iso800, it absorb more like, due to the fire fires weaker, perhaps (maybe) at 80% (20% weaker then the florescent, or proper term, shorter period, allow the rest of the opening shuttle for the florescent to overwrite the initial flash)
i am now talking bout micro seconds.

at iso200, the flashgun fires stronger (longer period to say) enough to over power the florescent light... hence the prettier WB picture

and for the weird BG(kitchen)... yes, iso200 should have darker kitchen, but its the DRO that kicks in that make it greenish blue ^^.

back from TT...=D

im beginner for sony dslr...want to ask some question. what picture format should I use for my camera?

banyak racun? ha ha ha

sorry guys wasnt able to attend the TT..last minute thing came out haih..

2nd to come back...uncle ian came quite late..
super poison...T_T