Also fed Acana to same dog, can't remember which type I fed but it had grain in it. He pooped a lot more, smellier too. This dog's tolerance for food with grain is especially bad so I just eliminate grain from his diet altogether. Some people's dogs do really well on it though.
QUOTE(Divas @ May 6 2010, 01:58 PM)
I think i love you...
This is the first time i have met someone on this forum who has such a deep understanding of canine nutrition and a firm grasp of what is good and what isn't (or at least the first time someone else has spoken up about it in such a concise and easy to understand manner).
I too am a strong believer that Science Plan/Science Diet/Hills is a totally poo food. The only exception i find is that the Formula for dogs with kidney failure does seem to improve the life of dogs with severe kidney problems. All the other varieties don't seem to produce any different results than a high quality normal food in sick dogs and doesn't keep a healthy dog as healthy as high quality normal foods.
Science Plan claims that it works by using a different production method to other foods that breaks down the ingredients into smaller chunks which eliminates the allergens in corn and such. However if you just didn't use ingredients that are known to be common causes of allergies (and other problems) in dogs, this wouldn't be an issue. Also there are some cases where dogs still exhibit the same symptoms they did previously showing that it doesn't in fact work in every case.
Also (the last time i checked) the nutritional values for Science Plan are lacking in almost every way. The easiest one to see is the Protein content which is much lower than you would want to see in a pet food for healthy active pets, or for pets who need as much energy as possible to fight off whatever they are suffering from.
I do know that only certified vets are allowed to order Science Plan and it does have quite a high profit margin compared to most other food brands which makes it an attractive sale. Also Science Plan has been known to be one of the main sponsors for a number of vet text books.
I'm not saying all vets are pushing Science Plan just for an attractive profit, but there are better foods out there (and i have heard of a few vets who prefer to suggest high quality brands over Science Plan) but some do, i have personally be "prescribed" Science Plan (suggested use for life in all cases) for Ringworm infection, Digestive Tract sensitivity, Picky eater and an Oversized Golden who is at high risk of developing Hip-Displasia in later life, all of which have been managed and (in the cases where possible) cured without the use of Science Plan.
Haha likewise, it's always great meeting someone who's really passionate about the wellbeing of their pets! I too am a strong believer that Science Plan/Science Diet/Hills is a totally poo food. The only exception i find is that the Formula for dogs with kidney failure does seem to improve the life of dogs with severe kidney problems. All the other varieties don't seem to produce any different results than a high quality normal food in sick dogs and doesn't keep a healthy dog as healthy as high quality normal foods.
Science Plan claims that it works by using a different production method to other foods that breaks down the ingredients into smaller chunks which eliminates the allergens in corn and such. However if you just didn't use ingredients that are known to be common causes of allergies (and other problems) in dogs, this wouldn't be an issue. Also there are some cases where dogs still exhibit the same symptoms they did previously showing that it doesn't in fact work in every case.
Also (the last time i checked) the nutritional values for Science Plan are lacking in almost every way. The easiest one to see is the Protein content which is much lower than you would want to see in a pet food for healthy active pets, or for pets who need as much energy as possible to fight off whatever they are suffering from.
I do know that only certified vets are allowed to order Science Plan and it does have quite a high profit margin compared to most other food brands which makes it an attractive sale. Also Science Plan has been known to be one of the main sponsors for a number of vet text books.
I'm not saying all vets are pushing Science Plan just for an attractive profit, but there are better foods out there (and i have heard of a few vets who prefer to suggest high quality brands over Science Plan) but some do, i have personally be "prescribed" Science Plan (suggested use for life in all cases) for Ringworm infection, Digestive Tract sensitivity, Picky eater and an Oversized Golden who is at high risk of developing Hip-Displasia in later life, all of which have been managed and (in the cases where possible) cured without the use of Science Plan.
As far as I understand from vet friends and reading up on commercial pet food, the main reason Science Plan/Hill's is so ubiquitous in vet practices is because they've got a lot of sponsorships/dealerships with vet schools (here's a lengthy article which mentions this for those of you interested in reading). The relationship continues when vets open their own practices and hook up with Hill's for lucrative dealerships. Same deal for breeders. I can only guess a lot of local pet shops push Hill's because the profit margin is really good (considering there are other crappy foods they can push but walk into a pet shop, act clueless and ask what's a good quality pet food and chances are the salesperson will direct you to the aisle with those oh so familiar shiny white bags of Science Plan kibble). I've had to shut my mouth often and stop myself from giving shoppers unsolicited advice when I overhear a salesperson tell innocently clueless shopper #214 how great Science Plan is. >_>
And yeah, thankfully there are good vets out there who are honest about what food to get or stock better quality selections. Can really empathise with you on encountering vets who prescribe Science Plan for everything under the sun (ringworm? srsly? lol). Parvo, picky eater, skin problems, mild infection - oh hey here's this really good prescription diet, I'm not going to justify or explain why it's good, trust me I'm a vet! (I'm a bit of a prat when interacting with not-so-great vets and clueless pet shop salespeople, I feign ignorance to see what kind of BS they feed me
QUOTE(Sashan @ May 7 2010, 08:53 AM)
I read proctor n gamble bought over natura. Apparently after they bought over science plan n hills the quality went down the drain. So dunno how long Origen is gonna last as a good food?
Wow, that really sucks. Orijen isn't made by Natura though. Hill's is owned by Colgate-Palmolive AFAIK. Anyway P & G's acquisition's still a blow to me, I really like Natura's Innova/EVO/California Natural lines. What happens really depends on how much operational independence Natura retains after the acquisition. AP reported "Procter & Gamble said the acquisition gives it access to the holistic and naturals pet food segment, which will complement its existing Iams and Eukanuba brands." So it looks as if P & G is basically looking to own a line of "good" pet food alongside its crappy IAMS/Eukanuba lines so they've got both segments of the market covered - wouldn't make sense for them to mess with the good thing Natura's already got going.
Currently they claim to perform humane, non-invasive animal testing (@ What type of testing does Natura do?. If P & G's involvement is going to change that or if I see ingredient changes for the worse, adios.
May 7 2010, 10:38 AM

Quote
0.0210sec
0.76
6 queries
GZIP Disabled