QUOTE(khelben @ Mar 27 2010, 01:22 AM)
You complain about developers releasing half baked games. You complain about blizzard taking their time to finish their games.

well, some people still waiting for duke dukem.... like forever...
QUOTE(hydrogen @ Mar 27 2010, 10:50 AM)
wow. grumpy. relax man.
Come to think of it, I've never really seen you happy on the forums.
chill...
Me a fanboy? Maybe? Nah, not really. I like most games. Maybe it's because I only buy the ones who have good reviews.
So be it EA, Bioware, Blizzard, Activison(!), 2k... or even ciplak developer, I support. As long as the game is good.
Why must attack them? No point.
Constructive criticism, yes.
Blind attacks, no.
finally, I repeat. chillllllllllllll maaaaaaaan
life is too short to be angry all the time.
the thing is, sometime the crativity comes *after* the game developed and released
look at valve fast-paced, virus infected 'braaaaaaiiiinnzzz!!!' genre that had many positive reviews on the graphics, designs, AI and the idea of making such game only to be hit, bashed by the same group who enjoyed it after more ideas gotten out from the dev group and feedbacks from gamers when they reslot those ideas into into sequel, in a very, very short time.
setting aside creativity, dev should knw what players should expected when they release their franchise title: warcraft must be medieval; warhammer would have space marines (with swords!!!)
but there are still certain criteria we should think of: blizzard games are not quite graphical intense, compared to most other dev; in you lurk thru SC2 posts, you'll know that someone with p4 old radeon card can play the game in lowest (and ugliest??) settings. this act actually secure and widen their incomes as some people (like me) who are reluctant to change pc every 1 or 2 years just to get the game going.