Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 I hate Starcraft II

views
     
Instant_noodle
post Mar 27 2010, 11:21 AM

nyaaa~~
*******
Senior Member
2,780 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: yokumo village
QUOTE(khelben @ Mar 27 2010, 01:22 AM)
You complain about developers releasing half baked games. You complain about blizzard taking their time to finish their games.

rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif
*

well, some people still waiting for duke dukem.... like forever...

QUOTE(hydrogen @ Mar 27 2010, 10:50 AM)
wow. grumpy. relax man.
Come to think of it, I've never really seen you happy on the forums.
chill... smile.gif

Me a fanboy? Maybe? Nah, not really. I like most games. Maybe it's because I only buy the ones who have good reviews.
So be it EA, Bioware, Blizzard, Activison(!), 2k... or even ciplak developer, I support. As long as the game is good.
Why must attack them? No point.
Constructive criticism, yes.
Blind attacks, no.

finally, I repeat. chillllllllllllll maaaaaaaan
life is too short to be angry all the time.
*

the thing is, sometime the crativity comes *after* the game developed and released

look at valve fast-paced, virus infected 'braaaaaaiiiinnzzz!!!' genre that had many positive reviews on the graphics, designs, AI and the idea of making such game only to be hit, bashed by the same group who enjoyed it after more ideas gotten out from the dev group and feedbacks from gamers when they reslot those ideas into into sequel, in a very, very short time.

setting aside creativity, dev should knw what players should expected when they release their franchise title: warcraft must be medieval; warhammer would have space marines (with swords!!!)

but there are still certain criteria we should think of: blizzard games are not quite graphical intense, compared to most other dev; in you lurk thru SC2 posts, you'll know that someone with p4 old radeon card can play the game in lowest (and ugliest??) settings. this act actually secure and widen their incomes as some people (like me) who are reluctant to change pc every 1 or 2 years just to get the game going.
Instant_noodle
post Jun 3 2010, 06:22 PM

nyaaa~~
*******
Senior Member
2,780 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: yokumo village
QUOTE(evofantasy @ Jun 3 2010, 05:53 PM)
well blizz already have the perfect formula...
why change something that is working rite?

having a server would be better as the server could prevent possible hacks like maphacks via packet checks...
of course there would be more latency issues...

ya cata might be delayed...
3.5 is not out yet and sitll busy in PTR (though might be next week)
*

is this a WoW thread?? i'm.... i'm must be dreamin...

*mods b!tch slapped noodlez back to reality*

my 'hate' for SC2 is still about the pricing for SEA edition although i really don't mind matching up with ah beng commenting about HIGH latency (well, TMNut... sg players stated i'm either rerouted from india or europe when joining any sg hosted games playing WC3) that made them lose the game.

This post has been edited by Instant_noodle: Jun 3 2010, 06:22 PM
Instant_noodle
post Jun 3 2010, 07:51 PM

nyaaa~~
*******
Senior Member
2,780 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: yokumo village
QUOTE(Jas2davir @ Jun 3 2010, 07:40 PM)
just like how those who boycotted mw2 bought it on the 2nd month.
*

you mean yourself, rite?
Instant_noodle
post Jun 4 2010, 03:18 PM

nyaaa~~
*******
Senior Member
2,780 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: yokumo village
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jun 4 2010, 03:15 PM)
when did this happened or rather, who did this happened with?  shocking.gif


Added on June 4, 2010, 3:16 pm

when a beta game is already having tournaments that involved thousands of dollars. i dont know man...
*

this is whut happened when you messed with Horo for so many times

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0222sec    0.22    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 02:40 PM