QUOTE(cherroy @ May 19 2010, 02:17 PM)
Disregard whether YTL holds how much the stake, if one doesn't like it, then just vote "no".
It might not has any material effect, but if there is significant minority shareholders vote "no", then it also sends the message to the management board as well. (besides disposing)
SC is going to change the new regulation on asset liabilities disposal issue in the near future as well.
I would say exercise your right/preference disregard the outcome, although one might think or in actual fact, it could be irrelevant.
You never know what happens next.
We can always vote "NO", and if there is enough "hands" to say "no",
then the resolutions will not be passed.
It's not about how much share that vote, it's about how much shareholder that vote.
And the more share concentrated, the more dangerous it's,
because when there is 99.9% of share goes to big shareholder and the company management,
and 1 share for another shareholder, if the small shareholder vote "NO" in every resolutions,
it'll effectively force to AGM to ground. Because as company management,
they don't exercise their vote, which is why I believe that HO HUP tussle was set in.