Ahhhhh my di622 is dead T.T see nikon D40 thread T.T

Wow 2.5k for kit, means the 1 year warranty from NIKON MALAYSIA costs around RM900. LOL

Spam spam... A simple photoshoot~ Testing out flash~




C&C too~

Do you guys notice that your photos appear brighter in your camera LCD than your monitor? Even though my monitor brightness set up higher but it's still brighter. Like this always make my photo underexposed cuz i thought it's bright inside my camera's LCD

This post has been edited by zellleonhart: Apr 22 2010, 04:49 PM

Yeah all of these are shot in raw. But I hope I can improve so that I can the right exposure without the need of PP~

Just shot another few pictures, will upload later. BTW, this 18-105mm lens tends to vignet at tight end (105mm)...

This post has been edited by zellleonhart: Apr 22 2010, 05:18 PM

Owh yea... Will learn to read... some photos it's just a bit underexposed but i can't recognize from the histogram too...

Yea I see... just like the following condition..


Are these too bright for u all? not sure if my LCD is displaying correctly.

Ya my idea was a high key photo... Damn I keep shooting these lifeless figures at home @@

Anyone wants TT? very sien ahhhhh

Good lor all of you have nikonian friends. My friend, 2 canon, 3 sony, NO NIKON... WTF i can only fight on my own T.T

Haha almost the same circumstances =D

Actually there were only 2 sonys, another 1 sony and 2 canons, i failed to poison them with D40 T.T they opted for 450Ds and A380.

But nikon's colour is much saturated and better contrast and a bit warm, isn't it? It goes the same to my D40 and D90.

lol my d40's warm and rich colors my fren said is too orangish/too much, made me so sad T.T

But I do like the color

Sony's IQ are not bad, color too, but the bodies design are
I can never like sony's viewfinder and grip

Lol then what made you stay with the dark side? ^^

77mm filter, must cost you a bomb =S

lol your 70-200's CPL? XD

gogo get one =D

@nic
Wait for some reviews 1st... But rm2850 should be much much better than tammy. muahahaha

@celciuz
16-35mm F4 is F4... it some how defeats the purpose of buying since initially you wan 1750 for f2.8 =D but it's a great lens!

@nic
And I suppose should have no back/front focusing prob and much more sharper.

uhh yea hor... but the siggy 1750 is still so tempting XD
Nikon 1755 to big @ss, i tried in nikon BTS, no VR also...

Yah VR is damn useful even just the VR I. The VR on my kitlens now (last time d40 kit lens no VR) is very useful, at 18mm can go as slow as 1/5 sharp.

24 f1.4! Stop poisoning, cannot tahan

Uhh 24mm F1.4 is $2,200, USA.

@@ didnt know it's so expensive!

Hmm 24mm f1.4 is already available in BTS? i thought new lens not yet have =X

I will just save me a 50mm 1.8 enough