Those think that VR is godlike, should read this

http://bythom.com/nikon-vr.htm

---

Added on April 29, 2010, 10:36 pmThose think that VR is godlike, should read this

http://bythom.com/nikon-vr.htm

This post has been edited by KTCY: Apr 29 2010, 10:36 PM

Wow nice facts! TLDR all... Only read some. Very true, some of us depend too much on VR.

Hmm btw my d90 kit lens when VR is on and after i focus, if i didn't shoot, just focus and release, there's this mechanical sound everytime i focus and release, and everytime after each shot. a small, short mechanical sound. it's normal right?

but i still think that having VR on a lens is an advantage it makes slow shutter speed possible

no wonder ppl say when do panning shud off VR

ya, thats d sound of the VR working
sounds louder in bigger zooms, especially 55-200, everytime the VR kicks in or off got 'kak' sound

Eh eh the link says when panning need to ON VR because when u panning you're moving your camera. read carefully =D

lol, did u read all? (although i jz scanned thru fast oso )
it suggest that we shud turn off VR when using shutter speed higher than 1/500
VR gives advantage when shooting with slow shutter speed, but at high shutter speed it gives more disadvantage

---

Added on April 29, 2010, 10:50 pmi heard during panning off VR is frm Celciuz IINM
he tried shooting during last F1, he said he got more successful shots when VR is off

This post has been edited by General_Nic: Apr 29 2010, 10:50 PM

tammy vc more cool, can see the viewfinder 'shaking' when the vc kicks in

Oh off VR when panning? Hmm experience is what I need, will try panning next time =D

Walao tammy so kua cheong? I prefer still viewfinder leh =X

Portrait taken some time back

C & C welcome

This post has been edited by KTCY: Apr 29 2010, 10:56 PM

not kua cheong.. really like tat.. at first i thought hav problem with the vc.. i see my friend's 1 oso same.. VC kick really 'kick'

55-200 oso, but the movement in viewfinder is after the VR off, like snap back in place

if i din read wrongly or my memory din fail me la, haha
best is experience sendiri

wow! lomo?

Eh guys i got this stupid problem but i think it cannot be solved... (actually not considered problem but a fuss)

Erm my D90 when i shoot at Low (0.3/0.7/1.0) or Hi (0.3/0.7/1.0) the exif data won't write the ISO value. It's blank. In camera I can see "HI 0.3" in the ISO there but in PC it's blank. HI 1.0 is ISO6400 in D90 but it seems that the ISO didn't be programmed as 6400, but HI 1.0.

Is there anyway to make the exif automatically shows 6400 in PC instead of blank? I am lazy to check the ISO on camera 1 by 1 and insert value myself...

THe photo not lomo but the camera on the lady hand is

Any comment on the pic ?

No way. Else they won't be naming it Low or High.

i thk the reason is cos the ISO6400 is not really 6400
on specs sheet it wrote ISO high boost up to 6400
so the 6400 is jz a boosted ISO of ISO3200, so the exif cant show ISO6400

Ouch. no wonder when I shoot at HI1.0 and ISO 3200, the noise is just about the same. HI 1.0 doesn't seem to be noisier than 3200. I see... Okay then... I won't use Hi 1.0 haha just want to test =D

eh？u bought d90 adi ar.

@KTCY
Very nice color with smooth bokeh, not to mention the sharpness! What lens used?

@skincladalien
yeah bought a week ago...

no comment on my pic ka??

i dun like the hand choped off