QUOTE(Cannibal @ Apr 8 2010, 03:08 PM)
D300s
anyone play bokeh here?
Me me...i love bokeh...that's why i love primes!!!!!
QUOTE(Cannibal @ Apr 8 2010, 03:21 PM)
actually, is there much different between f/1.4 and f/1.8? for me 1.8 is already very much enough. subject tends to out of focus when it has depth of +- 3cm.
bokeh gets scary on bigger sensors too

QUOTE(illegaldragon87 @ Apr 8 2010, 03:43 PM)
u cant get any sharp photo wit f1.8 @ 1.8... but itz not a prob at all if u shoot at 1.4 using f1.4
erh, depends on
1) your definition of sharp
2) lens
3) Camera
For me,some lens are really sharp at wide open. eg: Canon 85mm 1.8 USM
QUOTE(@meno @ Apr 8 2010, 04:11 PM)
Sp00kY, shoo~~~ go play with ur 5D M2...LOL...
These kind of price now, who will want to sell?
If you're new, go on P.
Then learn when u need to use A and S.
As for using M, if you have certain things in mind which is not achievable by using either A or S, only use M.
Using M doesn't make you an expert, nor does it show you're a better photographer.
I have to disagree with you to a certain extent.
First of all, the sharpness of the 1.8@1.8 is sharper than the 1.4 (be it D or G)@1.4.
As you stop down to F/2.8, the 1.8 is still sharper than both the 1.4 in the center, but on the corners the 1.4 does better.
Again as you stop down to F/4, the 1.8 is sharper than the 1.4 in the center, but loses out at the corners.
The reason for one not being able to get a sharp picture with a 50mm F/1.8 is the user problem and not the lens issue.
I've had friends who had taken stunningly sharp images with 50mm F/1.8s at 1.8 wide open, even i sometimes do that myself when i really need F/1.8.
Just remember, the DOF at F/1.8 is really shallow, a lot of times you don't get it sharp because of the shallow DOF and not really because the lens ain't sharp.
dah jual lo...eh, macam mana u tau ar hahah
yeah DOF at 85mm 1.8 is even shallower....


....i shot my friend using 85mm at 1.8, his eye is in focus and sharp, his eye brow adi bokehed...