Feb 24 2010, 03:08 PM
QUOTE(tanjq87 @ Feb 24 2010, 02:59 PM)
I have one 
The sigma 1224 is a different range. You will be amazed by it's 'wide-ness'. The only downside is the dark aperture, it starts from 4.5 to 5.6 if I am not mistaken. But again, many people will claim that if you shoot bright landscape, you don't need an f2.8 lens. So it's up to you. Sharpness wise I would say the KM1735 is slightly sharper than the sigma 1224. If you don't need that wide and need f2.8, I would say KM1735 is worth consideration. If your main aim is wide, nothing can beat the sigma 1224 in rectilinear form.
haha..stop poisoning me.. The sigma 1224 is a different range. You will be amazed by it's 'wide-ness'. The only downside is the dark aperture, it starts from 4.5 to 5.6 if I am not mistaken. But again, many people will claim that if you shoot bright landscape, you don't need an f2.8 lens. So it's up to you. Sharpness wise I would say the KM1735 is slightly sharper than the sigma 1224. If you don't need that wide and need f2.8, I would say KM1735 is worth consideration. If your main aim is wide, nothing can beat the sigma 1224 in rectilinear form.
yea..i might not need bright aperture or shallow DoF when im using wide angle lenses..maybe i shd take a 2nd look on the siggy..wads the price locally?
Quote
snootted small torch light maybe?
The MF ring was on infinity and the camera was 3 feet from the grasses btw. I've turned the focus ring a few times for a few attempts...but still, no luck. 
0.0243sec
0.43
7 queries
GZIP Disabled