QUOTE(neo_lam @ Mar 15 2010, 10:39 PM)
yeah..i will still stick with a700 now(unless i suddenly crazy and buy a a850)...next would be Distagon 24mm!!!
[attachmentid=1484652]Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V37!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Mar 15 2010, 10:40 PM
|
 
Senior Member
943 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: KL Sri Petaling   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 10:44 PM
|
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 15 2010, 10:40 PM) [attachmentid=1484652] wat a set of seducing glass...24*1.5=36mm on APSC...suitable for many type of shots... |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 10:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
943 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: KL Sri Petaling
|
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Mar 15 2010, 10:44 PM) wat a set of seducing glass...24*1.5=36mm on APSC...suitable for many type of shots... but 2.0 wor..enuf? |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 10:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 15 2010, 10:45 PM) but 2.0 wor..enuf? yeah...it is...with f2 just very easy to get ur subject in focus if it has a certain distance withe background....for example, a Zeiss 50mm Plannar f2....  This post has been edited by neo_lam: Mar 15 2010, 10:53 PM |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 10:54 PM
|
|
Senior Member
943 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: KL Sri Petaling
|
fuyoo....nice!!
|
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 10:56 PM
|
 
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
but i thought its not accurate to compare a lens on a rangefinder? ie. M9?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 10:58 PM
|
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching
|
1)duck in perth
 2)i wanted to try something different but didnt quite execute it as good as i had hoped.  3) a close up portrait of my sis in Ciao Italia (perth)  CnC MOST appreciated. |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 10:59 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 15 2010, 10:56 PM) but i thought its not accurate to compare a lens on a rangefinder? ie. M9? i know but in terms of bokeh there are not too much difference...it is M9!!! |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:01 PM
|
Senior Member
1,631 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong 
|
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Mar 15 2010, 10:50 PM) yeah...it is...with f2 just very easy to get ur subject in focus if it has a certain distance withe background.... dun think this bokeh is nice for example, a Zeiss 50mm Plannar f2.... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «  it looks noisy |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:03 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(cjlai @ Mar 15 2010, 11:01 PM) dun think this bokeh is nice ya..just wanna show kevin even f2 could do quait amount of bokeh...it looks noisy |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:03 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
neo, u edited the post right? the 1st photo has nicer bokeh..
Added on March 15, 2010, 11:04 pmhahhaahha f/2 of coz can la.. even kitlens 3.5 also considerably good d... to me, 'noisy' wasnt the 1st thing that comes to mind.. more like wahh, messy messy messyy... @_@ This post has been edited by lwliam: Mar 15 2010, 11:06 PM |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 15 2010, 11:03 PM) neo, u edited the post right? the 1st photo has nicer bokeh.. yeah...the 1st one nicer but this one the object more isolated...Added on March 15, 2010, 11:04 pmhahhaahha f/2 of coz can la.. even kitlens 3.5 also considerably good d... even f5.6 can nice if u have 100mm or longer focal length... This post has been edited by neo_lam: Mar 15 2010, 11:06 PM |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:06 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
can i look at the 1st pic again? thx
Added on March 15, 2010, 11:08 pm QUOTE(neo_lam @ Mar 15 2010, 11:05 PM) yeah...the 1st one nicer but this one the object more isolated... but like u said, this is on a 24mm ma.. so have to take that into consideration as welleven f5.6 can nice if u have 100mm or longer focal length... This post has been edited by lwliam: Mar 15 2010, 11:08 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:10 PM
|
Senior Member
640 posts Joined: May 2009 From: Whirlpool Island, Johto
|
neo_lam - M9!
 |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:12 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006
|
here you go...
 but i think even 24mm still can produce nice bokeh... |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:15 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
now this is wayyyyyyyy better than the earlier example...
|
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 15 2010, 11:15 PM) now this is wayyyyyyyy better than the earlier example... for me the bokeh is nice but the color is superb!! and the mood of the photo....  |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
943 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: KL Sri Petaling
|
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Mar 15 2010, 11:18 PM) for me the bokeh is nice but the color is superb!! and the mood of the photo.... M9 small but fierce... |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,921 posts Joined: May 2006
|
QUOTE(kevinwcw @ Mar 15 2010, 11:20 PM) M9 small but fierce... sure it is... |
|
|
Mar 15 2010, 11:33 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668
|
neo, yea was refering to the image as a whole... the muted colors are what i want to achieve in my photos, but its very hard. any pointers?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0294sec
 0.63
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 12:07 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.