Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Is Bravia S Series KLV-40S550A good?, need advice

views
     
HW-Racer
post Dec 23 2009, 09:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
729 posts

Joined: May 2008




I am confused by all your comments...in the Star Ads...it says the price = RM3999 for
LCD KLV-40S550A + FREE - DVD Home Theatre System - DAV-DZ590K ...and on top of that
you can get cash rebate of RM450 so only RM3549 right ??

TS2898
post Dec 23 2009, 09:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(HW-Racer @ Dec 23 2009, 09:00 PM)
I am confused by all your comments...in the Star Ads...it says the price = RM3999 for  
LCD KLV-40S550A +  FREE - DVD Home Theatre System - DAV-DZ590K ...and on top of that
you can get cash rebate of RM450 so only RM3549 right ??
*
exactly


Added on December 23, 2009, 9:16 pm
QUOTE(thk38 @ Dec 23 2009, 06:40 PM)
Yes, limited set so be quick.. No regret, price wise. Remind to those who want to purchase the S360 bluray player, u can still bargain. Can grabbed at RM999 instead of RM1499.
So the whole package only RM4000
*
bargain?? means if buy that promo set @ RM3999 den top up another RM999 for a blueray player? correct me if im wrong.

This post has been edited by 2898: Dec 23 2009, 09:16 PM
azbro
post Dec 23 2009, 09:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Johor Bahru


QUOTE(2898 @ Dec 23 2009, 09:11 PM)
exactly


Added on December 23, 2009, 9:16 pm

bargain??  means if buy that promo set @ RM3999 den top up another RM999 for a blueray player? correct me if im wrong.
*
Exactly, if wanna watch Bluray...get something better than the Sony S series...get the Panny Plasma 42S10, If I'm not mistaken, Panny also having offer now.
fx_53_xt
post Dec 23 2009, 09:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,048 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(azbro @ Dec 23 2009, 09:28 PM)
Exactly, if wanna watch Bluray...get something better than the Sony S series...get the Panny Plasma 42S10, If I'm not mistaken, Panny also having offer now.
*
never liked plasma's huge pixels and glossy screen. Its up to personal preferences though
Razaelx
post Dec 23 2009, 09:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
219 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: PJ



is the 32" S series 'okay' for ps3 gaming ? cannot afford v or w series tongue.gif
ar188
post Dec 23 2009, 10:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(fx_53_xt @ Dec 23 2009, 03:22 PM)
24p simply means the TV can display at 24 progressive frames per second (same as the film rolling rate in cinema). HDTV commonly accepts 50p/60p and better ones accept 24p.

I've seen a true 24p Blu-ray demo disc connected to a 24p TV and i just cant bear the low frame rate jagginess. 24p does not smooth up the video at all.
*
why would you want to watch 24P on TV? the point is to accept 24P (from BDs) and do 3:3 pull-down to 72Hz.. (something that the Kuros do well)

rather than 24P source do 3:2 pull-down on normal TVs..

also it's Stutter (time element) not jagginess... (that's reserved for pixel,)
fx_53_xt
post Dec 23 2009, 10:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,048 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 23 2009, 10:01 PM)
why would you want to watch 24P on TV? the point is to accept 24P (from BDs) and do 3:3 pull-down to 72Hz.. (something that the Kuros do well)

rather than 24P source do 3:2 pull-down on normal TVs..

also it's Stutter (time element)  not jagginess... (that's reserved for pixel,)
*
thanks for the correct term tongue.gif

i'm saying watching 24p BD, not broadcasted content (can one do that anyway?)
you mean the TV actually displaying 24p contents at 72Hz?
then the 3x frame rate is interpolated or just repeated frames?

my real confusion is that, while 24p supposed to make movies look cinematic, i get more of the "stutter" (low frame rate) feeling rather than cinema feeling. i swear i don't realize that much of "stutter" while watching movies in cinema.
TS2898
post Dec 24 2009, 10:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
people says that S series is not so good, but 40s is okay. is it true?
fx_53_xt
post Dec 24 2009, 11:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,048 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(2898 @ Dec 24 2009, 10:26 AM)
people says that S series is not so good, but 40s is okay. is it true?
*
40S is okay. i even highly recommend it for this promotion price.
32s ans 37s you can forget bout it and go for other brand.
TS2898
post Dec 24 2009, 11:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(fx_53_xt @ Dec 24 2009, 11:26 AM)
40S is okay. i even highly recommend it for this promotion price.
32s ans 37s you can forget bout it and go for other brand.
*
i see brows.gif
azbro
post Dec 24 2009, 11:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Johor Bahru


If you heart is with the Sony 40 S series..then go ahead and buy..you'll be happy for a couple of years more with it.

Then when those LED stuff goes down in price, you can consider again...there will always a next time.
Razaelx
post Dec 24 2009, 11:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
219 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: PJ



QUOTE(fx_53_xt @ Dec 24 2009, 11:26 AM)
40S is okay. i even highly recommend it for this promotion price.
32s ans 37s you can forget bout it and go for other brand.
*
like what brand ? cause i'm considering on buying sony 32" S series , could u guys suggest me any other 32' LCD tv thats better than S series ?
TS2898
post Dec 24 2009, 12:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(azbro @ Dec 24 2009, 11:35 AM)
If you heart is with the Sony 40 S series..then go ahead and buy..you'll be happy for a couple of years more with it.

Then when those LED stuff goes down in price, you can consider again...there will always a next time.
*
hmm.gif true true.. actually is there any big difference between LCD and LED? (i only know LED is slimmer)

This post has been edited by 2898: Dec 24 2009, 12:44 PM
honamd77
post Dec 24 2009, 01:35 PM

Enjoy Your Life Before You Die
******
Senior Member
1,008 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Capital Square Kuantan


QUOTE(fx_53_xt @ Dec 23 2009, 12:46 PM)
32" and 37" S series sucks big time.
However, the 40" S series uses EXACTLY the same panel and processor as the V series.
The only difference between 40" S series (KLV-40S550A) and 40" V series (KLV-40V550A) is the supplied stand (V can swivel while S cannot), and 24p/theatre mode.
*
im the owner 32's sweat.gif

hmmm..need looking other series hmm.gif
ar188
post Dec 24 2009, 05:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(fx_53_xt @ Dec 23 2009, 10:29 PM)
thanks for the correct term  tongue.gif

i'm saying watching 24p BD, not broadcasted content (can one do that anyway?)
you mean the TV actually displaying 24p contents at 72Hz?
then the 3x frame rate is interpolated or just repeated frames?

my real confusion is that, while 24p supposed to make movies look cinematic, i get more of the "stutter" (low frame rate) feeling rather than cinema feeling. i swear i don't realize that much of "stutter" while watching movies in cinema.
*
I guess it depends on TV..

anyway, you should check out Public enemies, shot on digital (michael mann production)... see if you like that kind of stutterless feel (I didn;t, looks like a Camcorder movie.. tongue.gif )

fx_53_xt
post Dec 24 2009, 07:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,048 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(Razaelx @ Dec 24 2009, 11:44 AM)
like what brand ? cause i'm considering on buying sony 32" S series , could u guys suggest me any other 32' LCD tv thats better than S series ?
*
Sharp/LG/Samsung all has better offering than sony in <RM2k range. However, if you can find the older generation of the 32s (model: KLV-32S400A), then go for that. I've seen it going as low as RM1399 and trust me, that old model PQ performs far more better than the new 32s550, and has much more features that sony left out in the new model.

QUOTE(2898 @ Dec 24 2009, 12:43 PM)
hmm.gif true true.. actually is there any big difference between LCD and LED? (i only know LED is slimmer)
*
there's only LED vs CCFL backlight LCD. Technically LED or not, they are still LCD.
The only advantage LED backlight can bring is local dimming (ie dim a part of screen when that part is displaying dark content to improve contrast ratio), and the so called "slim" LED TV is missing the local dimming ability and hence "slim" LED TV is technically the same as CCFL LCD TV.

QUOTE(honamd77 @ Dec 24 2009, 01:35 PM)
im the owner 32's  sweat.gif

hmmm..need looking other series  hmm.gif
*
new S550 or the old S400?
those who grabbed S400 during its end of life cycle promotion is really lucky as those remain as my favourite low end LCD till today.

Look closely and you'll find that the new 32" and 37" S550 has following issue when compared to old S400:
1) only 2x HDMI
2) missing S-video
3) poor viewing angle
4) poor video processing
5) missing ambient light sensor
6) missing swivel stand
7) much lighter than predecessor
8) missing 24p ability
9) missing theatre mode
10) missing S-Froce front surround sound processor/speaker
11) missing headphone out
12) missing bravia sync

the list goes on and on about what sony cut out of this new model. This new S550 is actually marketed as L series overseas as a really basic, cheap entry model (much like the T series here). Our V series here is S series overseas and so on. Welcome to Malaysia thumbup.gif

QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 24 2009, 05:49 PM)
I guess it depends on TV..

anyway, you should check out Public enemies,  shot on digital (michael mann production)... see if you like that kind of stutterless feel (I didn;t, looks like a Camcorder movie.. tongue.gif )
*
will check it out when i have chance smile.gif
lan_86
post Dec 24 2009, 07:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(Lone*Wolf @ Dec 23 2009, 12:31 PM)
Yeah, same sentiments.  Sony's products are good, barring the price.  But the 'S' series is not really a Sony, the series is just created to fight on pricing, for those who wants a Sony but cannot afford the real thing.  Pretty much like the Honda's City, Toyota's Vios, Porche's Cayman, BMW's 3 series, etc....

Yes, I will steer clear of Sony 'S'.  For that price, better look at other brands that are more fully equipped.
*
Sony is not Sony,Toyota is not Toyota.. rclxub.gif

Sony,Toyota,Porsche,etc sure laugh if they see this statement blush.gif

This post has been edited by lan_86: Dec 24 2009, 07:46 PM
Lone*Wolf
post Dec 24 2009, 08:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,442 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(lan_86 @ Dec 24 2009, 07:45 PM)
Sony is not Sony,Toyota is not Toyota.. rclxub.gif

Sony,Toyota,Porsche,etc sure laugh if they see this statement blush.gif
*
of course they will laugh la, inferior series also people wallop smile.gif
TS2898
post Dec 25 2009, 09:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(Lone*Wolf @ Dec 24 2009, 08:43 PM)
of course they will laugh la, inferior series also people wallop smile.gif
*
not worthy to buy?
Lone*Wolf
post Dec 25 2009, 04:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,442 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(2898 @ Dec 25 2009, 09:26 AM)
not worthy to buy?
*
All I am saying is there was a time when buying a Sony is as safe a decision as you can get. Personally, I am not too confident about that now so look around a bit more, for similiar pricing and spec, are there better alternatives? Happy Shopping smile.gif


3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0481sec    1.02    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 09:16 AM