Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Malaysia HWBot Super Pi 32M Online Challenge, Competition Officially Closed
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 19 2009, 11:12 PM
|
|
-pWs-: refer to sup3rfly 32M Low Clock Challenge where all top 5 is under 12m 30s. hehe... i believe breaking 13m is not that difficult. antonio: keep benching, wait till someone overtake you then only post the better score. lonely at the top is quite dangerous since the compy is a long one month plus compy. apis: as long as you are qualified to any of the category, i think spec comes second, tweaking 1st. unless the community here is all tweaking freaks where you need to maximize all the tweaks for best result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 20 2009, 12:04 AM
|
|
bryanyeo: Thanks for reminding, added into 1st post. it's 4.0GHz
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 20 2009, 03:03 AM
|
|
sup3rfly: yeah, had that problem too in the singapore challenge. no choice but to dower down the bclk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 20 2009, 01:42 PM
|
|
verdict: looks like Rojak and xixo is correct. usually that error is related to ram. btw, after resetting you ram.. you can del all unrelated files in the pi folder. keep 3 files which are 2 pi files and 1 exe. cause some times when you keep on get errors, they may always occur after that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 20 2009, 05:41 PM
|
|
bryanyeo: my result? it's in the example submission but it's i7 + dual channel.
verdict: 32M is totally different from 1M. 32M need certain stability. what i usually do is i get a good setting that can boot, and kinda stable in windows. then test run the 32M whether it pass or not. then if it pass, reboot to re-format. apply tweaks then run. that will be my best score for the oc setting.
btw, later i'll include DDR2 category for Athlon/Phenom II category. so everyone has their own chance to win within their hardware performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 20 2009, 08:23 PM
|
|
mozact89: ops... short of one cpu-z screenshot. mikeblink182: your clockspeed exceed by 0.1MHz, lol.
AMD DDR2 and DDR3 separated into different categories!! and we have new leaders in both the categories!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 20 2009, 08:55 PM
|
|
syazone: sorry, updated. always forgot about you. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 20 2009, 11:43 PM
|
|
nice effort there kimtee. but i'm afraid i need to disappoint you cause the gap for celeron is too much. and if i put it in AMD category it will be very weird. but you effort has been taken down for the record. there's always effort prize. hehe... although it's a very small prize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 20 2009, 11:55 PM
|
|
the most important criteria should be constance self-improving. and here it's not mass entry where they oc-setting is almost the same and only slight improvement achieved. someone who keep on tweak his oc-setting to achieve better ram freq, uncore, timing followed by tweaks will be the top contender for best effort.
for example. verdict is currently is my favorite list for best effort prize cause you can see constance improvement from his oc-setting and judging from his post, he's seeking for more tweaking knowledge. in short, verdict vs uzer85 - verdict wins.
as for unlikely result that can challenge a supposedly faster proc, it's possible as well. this criteria is as important. so this may get the prize as well. best effort is not limited to one prize only.
This post has been edited by Sanko: Dec 20 2009, 11:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 21 2009, 12:08 AM
|
|
OT: WTF, verdict the female OCer. ASL please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 21 2009, 08:59 AM
|
|
Rojak44: sorry dude, you last submission is over the 9mhz overMHZage allowed. it's kinda tricky there. hehe...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 21 2009, 09:35 AM
|
|
fuzore: nice effort bro. just to ask, i realize that both ss is from a same spec/pc. logically speaking, the first ss above should be the faster result because of tighter timing. care to elaborate is it the second run you apply extra tweaks? just curios cause...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 21 2009, 09:48 AM
|
|
what a noob i am. still not familiar with AMD. for i7 it's the uncore. that explains. nicely done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 21 2009, 12:31 PM
|
|
verdict: game booster? now this is really an unknown tweak for me. care to elaborate? PM maybe? btw, now it's really lonelyatthetop!! your score is too far apart. i assume the final run is with copywazza / OCX Super Pi Tweaker.
uzer85: Low Clock Challenge is suppose to be like this. where the competition is going on with new submission which usually will overtake each other. no worries.
There's an announcement in the 1st post. Do check it out guys. It's a huge announcement!
This post has been edited by Sanko: Dec 21 2009, 12:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 21 2009, 05:41 PM
|
|
fuzore: if i'm not mistaken, you can register without a team. but you can always register with a team (ex: Lowyat) so that you can contribute to the team points as well. or you can create a team and recruit members for your team. There's country, team, etc ranking for it. hehe...
antonio: more more more.... let the competition between you and verdict entertain us.
xixo_12: hehe.. waiting for your up-coming result in jan with better ram?
This post has been edited by Sanko: Dec 21 2009, 05:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 21 2009, 05:55 PM
|
|
wow... TEAM Captain ler. don't play play. hope that this compy will bring up Msia Ranking globally and the OC Community here. Regarding 'Not Exact In Round' issue, should be ram problem. IIRC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 21 2009, 11:51 PM
|
|
results updated. cheers mate. seems like i7 category quiet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 22 2009, 09:13 AM
|
|
nice run there alex. i think you score will stay there for quite sometime if the community do not really get into tweaking. hehe...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 22 2009, 09:51 AM
|
|
beast921 and fuzore: it's nice to submit your score to hwbot as well. but just for better understanding, what i meant is actually this compy will be turned into a official competition in hwbot and the submission is through that competition section. we are still working out details,official web,logo,etc. hope it goes well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSanko
|
Dec 22 2009, 02:45 PM
|
|
according to Gautam findings, Win XP x64 is faster for Super Pi 1M. too bad he didn't test 32M http://www.overclockers.com/windows-showdo...s-6-benchmarks/
|
|
|
|
|