Whoa..So long replies..Interesting

Okay, I will try to answer as much as possible to all the questions that are carried out..First of all, before SanosukeSagara gets mad at me for not answering his question again, "Why Nexus One does not have multi-touch"..Well, I didn't answer that because it was just answered a few posts before your question..lol..THe hardware is there, you just have to "unlock" it..Now when Apple has patented their multi-touch and think that no one else can use, Google had to remove it from the OS..Longer explaination, read on..
Let me tell you one interesting story my friend. iPhone did not break through anything special other than the multi-touch (which I even wonder if they made it first). When iPhone's first gen came out, its strongest rival at that time was? Right! It was the Nokia N95

Remember the YouTube parody videos "I'm an Apple iPhone and I'm a Nokia N95"? Similar to the "Windows vs Mac" parody. That time, N95 stepped all over iPhone with every single features it had. Anything productive. N95 owned! Camera? Stereo sound? Multi-tasking? GPS? 3.5G? everything was led by N95 against iPhone. Only one thing iPhone had better over N95 and that was advertising in US. The "iphone virus" spread so fast, that in a matter of time, there were so many iPhone zombies. So, iPhone is NOT a breakthrough either for the fact. Oh, and now that we are talking about Nexus One NOT being unique form other Android phones, tell me my friend, what was so cool in iPhone 3GS over iPhone 3G? Processor? Apply back the same theory you specified about Pentium 4

For your points, let me take them one by one..
Replied in RedTo me, N1 is a good phone with a relatively cheaper price too but also a sign of Google showing its evil tail. Google is selling this phone as the Google phone for few reasons
(Google has every reason to be evil if thats the term we want to use here. They provide so many free services for us which we can't avoid. I bet you use Google products too don't you?):
1. The Android manufacturer is reluctant to update their device and the Google phones are the way Google whip them to update their phone by challenging their products with always updated Android phone.
(I'm sorry, I don't get you in this point. If you're missing the point, HTC only "manufactured" Nexus One. Google owns it. From the name's trademark "Nexus One" all the way to the selling of the gadget itself. If you're talking about HTC not updating their products, I agree HTC is SLOW in updating their softwares, but bear in mind, they are working across other platforms like Winmo too)2. Google Checkout has been a failure due to Paypal. People are using Paypal more than Google Checkout and Google is using the name of Android to bring out Google Checkout. I personally used Paypal for a lot times but Google Checkout only this once.
(I use paypal too. And I make more than 50 transactions a month on PayPal. My business runs on PayPal. I knew the existance of Google Checkout too, but never had the urge to use it - until I stepped into Android world. If checkout starts getting more famous against PayPal just because of Android, I would seriously thank Android for that. Why? Once again, rivalling strives towards excellence. PayPal's charges are ridiculously high over each transaction. But since its the most famous online payment gateway, you just have to be dragged into using it for whatever they demand. Finally we will have a solid rival then. Thanks Android for that. Also, you never know if Android was part of Google's plan already before checkout was even made. They build a world of their own and use their OWN services unlike iPhone which has to use Google's products to achieve maximum functionality.3. Google phone is the phone to promote Google product like Google Map, Google Voice, Google Earth, Google Navigation and Google Goggles.
Yup! And your point is? We don't expect Apple to promote Google's product do we?lol4. Make use of its fan base to heighten up their reputation.
Thats how every company excels. Fans are the ones who make a company famous. They wouldn't have us if they didn't made great products in the first place. You got a competitor in mind that has made all these products so far other than Google?
In the second part that you specified..
For those like Shahz who think Android is the triumph in the future, I doubt it will be based on several reasons:
1. Android is chasing the tail of Iphone OS with Iphone continuously making breakthrough, setting the standard and getting their patent.
Tell me one breakthrough they have made other than the multi touch screen. lol. Remember, Android has speech to text feature which is also a breakthrough. I don't see much of its use yet, but its still something new if breakthrough is the concern.2. Google has no real intention of making Android. (They do not put money to advertise and real breakthrough need lotsa money thats why Iphone is expensive)
LOL..You're talking like you work in Google..haha..Dude, they made version 1.0 AND 2.0 within less than a year. They are working on it - really hard. They do spend the money on it. But they don't spread viruses like Apple via advertisment. Google is an advertisment itself. It doesn't need to spend money on advertising further. Internet has more users than TV now so what makes us think that TV advertising will thrive over internet? Oh, and you got any online advertising company better keyword-targetted, better potential, better than Adwords? Good luck in finding one
3. Google core business is information based not computer product. Android is another platform for them to utilise their product.
Yep, thats why they created Android OS (the software) and not the phone itself. They just do what they are best at. I dont see anything wrong here.4. If Android fails, they still have ChromeOS.
First, they are not related to each other. Second, Android is not going to fail. Its already on the rise. I could give you statistics if you want
5. Most importantly, they have capture the wrong fans like Shahz who think Android is powerful because it can customize, mod and hack (and not iphone of course).
I suggest you get a line of proof where you can prove that I even said this. Android is Open System. You don't have to go through a stupid jailbreaking process to get root access to it. It means "freedom" if you don't know why we mod our phones. Yes, Android at its failing point because of you guys.
Dude! You are talking without any proof! Androids sales are increasing, Android fans are increasing. LYN Android thread is getting more members. PROOF man! Thats what we need! No one really wanna put money to promote and heighten the core competencies of Android because you guys view Android is another Google phone rather than a HTC phone or a Samsung phone or a Motorola phone. (We always address the phone with its NAME. We use terms like HTC Hero, Magic, Dream, Nexus One, etc. We never use the term "Android" unless we're referring to the whole category. You need to hang around here more before you could point finger at us like that! [/COLOR] These handphone manufacturer still need to compete between each other even they has Android phone series. If they put in cash to invest (like advertising and develop unique apps locked to their phones), and you guys hacked it and put it in other Android phone, its lost of investment for them.
Says who? You're telling me that all this while, Windows Mobile devices were only produced by Windows? Or are you saying that Symbian was only made by Nokia? Or are you saying that Acer, Dell, HP, etc compete with each other because they use Windows OS in them? Are you from earth bro? In fact, you get choices to pick that one you like the most. Not everyone will like Nexus One, they can go with the Droid. Or Hero. Or Tattoo if they are lower on budget. Unlike iPhone, you just have to adapt to that look. No choice! It is the real scenario now. Later I will see Xperia x10 UI ported into a HTC Bravo or Motoblur from Motorola ported into this Nexus One.
That sounds like fun to me. Because of that too they dont wanna invest in multitouch. If they wanna put multitouch in their phone is easy, they just need to pay royalty to Apple.
Why would they pay iPhone when its their rival? Apple pays Google for using their services? No right? Verizon paid the royalty thats why Droid Eris got it. But why other phone manufacturer dont wanna pay for that? Because paying for that does not buy them the competitive advantage as you guys can hack it into multitouch in any Android phone.
Yeah..So why bother? Thats the purpose of keeping the phone open system at the first place. Your only point is multitouch here. Seriously, my Hero has multitouch and I really dont use it at all. My macbook has multitouch touchpad but I personally use mouse coz I find it easier than the multi-touch.Seriously dude, its not going to work here. If you want to go head to head with us, why not you get yourself iPhone and regret in the coming 3 years? Because Android is here to stay and we are their supporters. You can try as hard as you want, we will have an answer for everything. But please at least base your statements on true facts and proof.
Oh, and as far as your bad review link is concerned, don't make me post bad review links for iphone - a phone which cant even do multitasking at this generation! Everyone has their own opinions and just because a blogger says he don't like it and he sits in the same boat as you, that is not going to change anything for us.

I already told you, I dont have anything against iPhone, but you keep stating the points again and again which make me prove iPhone is not good. Why not you gather some iPhone fans in the iPhone board and bash Android there? You will get a lot more support than you will get here.
Here in Android world, we talk about performance. Speed. Multi-task. Internal stuff. Not some junior teenage show off trendy stuff. I don't want to be rude, but I was really disappointed with non-directional finger pointing towards Android. But then again, you cheer me up everytime you say I'm Google's maniac..Thanks for that at least..