This is where atheists will catch you.

Use this:

Well... i know some people who say emotions are the byproduct of biochemical reactions in our body. Like love, its nothing more than a biochemical release to feed our human instinct to procreate.

LOL! And how is the "feeling" and "epiphany" that "God is with us" isn't too, the by product of biochemical reactions? And if science actually proved that the chemical reactions = truth, aren't they telling that those who believed in God with their "feelings" are true as well?

This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Dec 16 2009, 06:52 PM

My player-god told me last night that each one of us is piece of representation of god, the living cycle is just an entertainment like we like to watch movie and play.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Dec 17 2009, 10:11 AM

Your player-god?

I am just the puppet in flesh & blood, thought I am independent but actually I am only fooling myself like everyone else who think they are clever or dumb.

In my limited vocabulary, player-god rather than the ism, ist, sts... my life is a game and I play along, I am creative with trained skills that categorized me as the minority rather than the ordinary people, though far from being a genius, I made my player-god proud who also play many other human characters that will interact with me.

What if these strings that are controlling you are cut off from you all of a sudden?

That is when I go crazy lah, without "guidance" I will likely to go extreme and got myself killed and take some people with me If I am abandoned.
My interpretation of my own god has been around for years and you ask me the questions I already thought of, see if you can think of what I missed.

Hasn't that situation is already happening?

This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Dec 18 2009, 04:25 AM

lolz.... u got me

Scientists don't care to explain or prove the existence of their own intangible emotions. They hardly believe in it themselves too. Their work and research is based on fact and findings. They label God as a delusion because for them it is intangible.

Then again they can try to prove their own emotions if they wanted to. The study of psychology.

God is just another being created by humans as a way to fall back onto when all else fails.

However, I don't believe there's such a thing as god. What happens just happens. Its all about science, coincidence and maths. The rest are all thrown in with a bunch of human-created factors created to influence human as a way to unite and be under 1.

Such statements can be a fallacy.

You say God is created by humans as a fall back when all else fails. If you say God does not exists then surely everything will still keep failing when people look upon God. Of course if that is the scenario then they will eventually stop believing in God. I don't see that happening anything soon.

Influence human as a way to unite and be under one is also a poorly conceived idea. Why are they so many Gods then? We even have people believing in the same God yet they clash with each other.

If you don't believe in God, you will need better debunking theories.

LOL! BULL SHITE!

If psychology can ACTUALLY prove the existence of intangible "feelings", wouldn't they also proved the existence of God of those having the epiphany of "feeling God", and the feeling of "God is with us"?

And if scientist claimed that those feelings are merely delusion, how then, it is any different of a delusion from their own emotions which are "felt"?

Then you might wanna read my previous post below.

This post has been edited by Deadlocks: Dec 18 2009, 10:45 AM

Why is it bullshit? They are just selective on what they want see as tangible or intangible. Hence "feeling God" and the feeling of "God is with us" is a delusion to them.

And the basic emotions of "feeling sincerity" is LESS THAN a delusion all of a sudden?

Come on. That is just plain ignorance from those scientists.

If I'm not mistaken not all scientists are non-believers. Those who dabble in science and also has faith, I do wonder what is their stand.

----

This post has been edited by marsalee: Nov 13 2010, 08:24 PM

I'll rephrase then.

"Atheists who uses science against the believe of the intangible, in this case, God."

food for thought