wow 70-200 under 5k...that's cheap man! hehe ofcoz it's heavy but duuude the pics u can get with that lens are simply awesome

8gb class 10 for rm92???? so cheap

noob question here. let's say i want to take a picture of someone at 200mm, during sunset like that, max aperture with 'steady' shutter speed n max ISO but pic still too dark. so if i use sb600, will the flash 'reach' my subject?

oh thanks does this mean im better off with 18-105 rather than 18-200?

wow lots of reply after my flash range question...thanks a lot all

i didnt know flashguns can converge the light when zooming hehehe. if sb600 can only reach up to 85mm then i guess no use for me getting 18-200... since 86-200 the flash wont reach n the aperture is pretty low already, so most likely i'll end up with shaky shots unless it's a sunny day.. am i right?

^ what if during outdoors? but just want to light up one person for a tight portrait

no la...wanna skodeng ma.. wakakaka

jk jk.. im just asking cuz i feel if i get a 200mm lens but flash cannot reach, cant use the 200mm end much anyway for moving objects. actually also for static objects, since i dun have a tripod, n pretty bad with handheld

^ lol i juz want to know at 200mm it's possible or not. e.g. model standing on a bridge, i want to shoot perpendicular to the length of the bridge. i dunno whether i'll do that or not la, but i juz wanna know

what part about 200mm is plain bullshit?