Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion

views
     
TSamadeo
post Nov 23 2009, 12:32 AM

Mafia
*******
Senior Member
3,503 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: ..Whenever i may roam...
i can imagine how ur danbo shot will look like if u use the STF .. brows.gif
achew
post Nov 23 2009, 12:34 AM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


lol..seriously i cant really decide...hahaha...
MechaHerc
post Nov 23 2009, 12:47 AM

アルファ ソニ
******
Senior Member
1,967 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Side 3



QUOTE(-milo- @ Nov 23 2009, 12:21 AM)
wah..me newbie onli u so fast poison me?? the pic is really really awesome man..so smooth and nice and dreamy omg..
y say no to this lens leh?
*
achew, dun confusing our new alpharian tongue.gif

QUOTE(achew @ Nov 23 2009, 12:26 AM)
STF perhaps not easy to use and not as flexible as other lenses(prime..F4.5 light transmission..heavy..blablabla)...altho i had to admit that the bokeh is really #@$%^$#@!

very itchy to get a 70200(maybe G..maybe tamron)...but after browsing thru some shots..the bokeh doesnt attracts me alot...i think 135 1.8's bokeh looked alot better...
*
but.. but.. STF is niceee lens too for still life shooting (ur danbo, storm trooper will like this soo much) brows.gif
albnok
post Nov 23 2009, 12:49 AM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


I would say I prefer the Minolta-style bokeh to the Carl Zeiss. Anyway, isn't your work far more deliberate and planned out?

For example here's some from a Minolta 135mm F2.8, a superb compact lens which shouldn't be too expensive:
http://www.ewinee.com/
ieR
post Nov 23 2009, 12:52 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE(albnok @ Nov 22 2009, 11:20 PM)
ieR: I am at page 6, and there is nothing that says the A550 is faster with the 55-200mm SAM (where you imply that the 55-200mm SAM is not faster on other cameras.)
sh|tz, i misunderstood u, i tot u mean u wan proof on the last statement i did of the buffer limit of A550 on raw FPS... lol crap, i need to dig all the history again sad.gif

*edit: no no, i dont imply that SAM is not fast on other camera, i implying, that the A550 new AF would bring out the best potential of the SAM, older alpha AF sensor werent as good as A550, so during AF-C for say, children running around, it wouldnt use it best potential to use the SAM to AF. mean on older then A550, sam would be fully push to the best potential. so A550 would benefit from it more, or other way around it will benefit more used on A550 then A3xx. no?

*edit2: okay, here to easy understand, the SAM only have 1 speed, not slower, not faster, 1 speed. so even on any camera, it still goes at the same speed (doesn't this sound better? tongue.gif) what i trying to say is, above, A550 will uses the SAM ability to give upperhand on A550 shooting because of the new faster AF sensor in burst mode, shooting 4fps, with every frame are focused right, then with A300 burst with ever 1/4 has miss focused even with SAM. no?

This post has been edited by ieR: Nov 23 2009, 01:03 AM
achew
post Nov 23 2009, 12:56 AM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(albnok @ Nov 23 2009, 12:49 AM)
I would say I prefer the Minolta-style bokeh to the Carl Zeiss. Anyway, isn't your work far more deliberate and planned out?

For example here's some from a Minolta 135mm F2.8, a superb compact lens which shouldn't be too expensive:
http://www.ewinee.com/
*
i ever considered about that b4..but i was thinking..if i get 70200 1 day...then 135 2.8 would be totally replaced..im those kind of people who doesnt really mind the troubles of bringing heavy lenses...

i dont really get the part about my work far more deliberate and planned out...r u trying to say that i can take my sweet time to MF using STF ?? tongue.gif
signither
post Nov 23 2009, 01:07 AM

Certified Mutant
*******
Senior Member
3,557 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Republic of Selayang


haul of the day

user posted image


brows.gif
weixuan
post Nov 23 2009, 01:14 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
584 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(signither @ Nov 23 2009, 01:07 AM)
haul of the day

user posted image
brows.gif
*
nice.. where did you get it... and how much?

and nice attention to detail with the A900 brochure below...

This post has been edited by weixuan: Nov 23 2009, 01:15 AM
albnok
post Nov 23 2009, 01:25 AM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


ieR: Yes the A550 is 30% faster than the A350 in AF-C.

user posted image

Of course, the 55-200mm SAM on the A350 will still be faster than the 55-200mm on the A350. I do not know if they also improved the screw-drive motor or not.

achew: Yes, you can take your sweet time. You plan your shots a lot more than other people. I would say of all of us here you have more potential to use the STF (though, when you make fake bokeh it defeats the purpose of buying a lens for it.) MF is nowhere as hard as you think it is when using the STF, due to the large focus ring and long focus throw (how much you need to turn to go from close focus to infinity - bigger angle is easier for manual focus.)

I would like to see more outdoor shots from you. There the STF is not a problem. It's been a while, surely Singapore isn't just your room and figurines?
signither
post Nov 23 2009, 01:33 AM

Certified Mutant
*******
Senior Member
3,557 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Republic of Selayang


QUOTE(weixuan @ Nov 23 2009, 01:14 AM)
nice.. where did you get it... and how much?

and nice attention to detail with the A900 brochure below...
*
crumpler klcc.. rm80.. brows.gif

btw' it's not a brochure.. it's the new sony catalog.. pick that one up at sony style before going to crumpler next door laugh.gif
achew
post Nov 23 2009, 01:45 AM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(signither @ Nov 23 2009, 01:33 AM)
crumpler klcc.. rm80.. brows.gif

btw' it's not a brochure.. it's the new sony catalog.. pick that one up at sony style before going to crumpler next door laugh.gif
*
haha..we have the same strap now =)
ieR
post Nov 23 2009, 01:48 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE(albnok @ Nov 23 2009, 01:25 AM)
ieR: Yes the A550 is 30% faster than the A350 in AF-C.

user posted image

Of course, the 55-200mm SAM on the A350 will still be faster than the 55-200mm on the A350. I do not know if they also improved the screw-drive motor or not.

*
not just faster, more accurate. there are reviewer tested it intensively, stated that, it in fact, (they declare) that previous model usually will have BF/FF problem in lowlight shooting, where A550 fix all that. seeing A550 has a breakthrough fixing so much of problem face with previous generation and great improvement..., iso, AF, fps, LV,... i think future model WILL be VERY promising. in fact, sony did improve so much in 3 years of acquire Alpha, of what took canon 7 years to do. biggrin.gif

so, when u use SAM on A350 vs no SAM on A350, in a burst shooting on AF-C, does SAM will make the AF-C works better?

*edit: do i still have to find u the proof of source? i am tired of reading all the article i been through sad.gif


Added on November 23, 2009, 1:51 ampic of my day,... since gf not in town, i got the whole afternoon for myself, took a walk and shoot. to me, i am reluctant to shoot sunset, because i been shooting it for the pass 10 month... but i guess, this is some new sight for a lot of people. enjoy tongue.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Handheld on a shaky platform (sail/yacht platform) and a good job from the SSS on 50mm ( sony rock when our prime lens has SSS while there is no VR or IS on other prime )

This post has been edited by ieR: Nov 23 2009, 09:40 AM
porkchop
post Nov 23 2009, 01:55 AM

Lalala Life's Sweet
*******
Senior Member
6,633 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: www.kelvinchiew.com


tadaaaa, nothing fancy....seems like slightly off-focus on my tamron

user posted image
Wonka
post Nov 23 2009, 02:05 AM

U n k o ™
******
Senior Member
1,643 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: U n k o L a n d


QUOTE(signither @ Nov 23 2009, 01:07 AM)
haul of the day

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

brows.gif
*
Thats the strap I wanted to get when I bought my 7MDH. Not enough money that time. So never buy lol.
invisibl3boyz
post Nov 23 2009, 04:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
244 posts

Joined: Oct 2008



pic spam for early mornin.. biggrin.gif
got the cars pic at 1U this evenin, and the water drop pic taken few hours ago.
guys..let me knw if smething wrong with the color...coz my laptop screen gt some serious problem with the color that appear... all car pic is 'fake bokeh' with pp... coz i only got kitlens to play with... sad.gif
anyway...C&c are welcome...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

millenia3000
post Nov 23 2009, 09:07 AM

OH YEAAAAA!!!!!!
******
Senior Member
1,462 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Klang,Subang Jaya


nice shots invisibl3boyz, but to my understanding, bokeh is the blur produced by defocused areas... the distance between the foreground object and the background determines the amount of bokeh not expensive or cheap lens... so yea, i think ur efforts are chun, but the last picture, the car pops out too much, even the floor is blurred...

my noob opinion.
ieR
post Nov 23 2009, 09:38 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
invisibl3boyz, the bokeh make the car like toys car, hehehe nice one. the color for the water+leaf looked fine on my work lcd(5 year old, i think contrast only like 1000:1) for the car shooting, i guess u need to read up bout white balance (if u use flash, read bout gel card)
Braynumb
post Nov 23 2009, 09:42 AM

Yea, Still Broke
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Somewhere Over There...


QUOTE(achew @ Nov 23 2009, 12:26 AM)
STF perhaps not easy to use and not as flexible as other lenses(prime..F4.5 light transmission..heavy..blablabla)...altho i had to admit that the bokeh is really #@$%^$#@!

very itchy to get a 70200(maybe G..maybe tamron)...but after browsing thru some shots..the bokeh doesnt attracts me alot...i think 135 1.8's bokeh looked alot better...
*
Oh oh... sounds like someone's moving away from 70200G to 135 f1.8Z... tongue.gif

QUOTE(albnok @ Nov 23 2009, 12:49 AM)
I would say I prefer the Minolta-style bokeh to the Carl Zeiss. Anyway, isn't your work far more deliberate and planned out?

For example here's some from a Minolta 135mm F2.8, a superb compact lens which shouldn't be too expensive:
http://www.ewinee.com/
*
Know anyone who's selling it tho?

This post has been edited by Braynumb: Nov 23 2009, 10:00 AM
ieR
post Nov 23 2009, 09:51 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE(HW-Racer @ Nov 22 2009, 08:14 PM)
I am looking at the a230 RM1799 or the A330 RM2199...but many of my friends advised against it...
they ask me to choose from either canon or nikon due to better quality...and cheaper/more variety
of accessories/lenses...

quite like the A230 due to its affordable pricing and design....
*
hahaha so many ppl reply to this, i also wan reply

u ask a sony user, he say sony good
u ask a canon user, he say canon good
u ask a nikon user, he say nikon good
u ask a olympus user,he say olympus best
u ask a window user, he say window good
u ask a mac user, he say mac is god
u ask a honda user, he say honda good
u ask a toyota user, he say toyota good
u ask a nokia user, he say nokia good
u ask a sony ericsson user, he say sonyericsson good
u ask a casio user, he say casio good
u ask a seiko user, he say seiko good
u ask a intel user, he say intel good
u ask those who owns nothing, he will tell u what he hears (same as above)

which is good leh? i bet when u chosen one brand, u say it good anyway. but since u have though of sony, i guess other whatever other says, ur mind has locked there already.

but seriously, the Ax30 model grip is a little, ehem... uncomfortable. but the spec, is far better then any budget range.
MemorableStudios
post Nov 23 2009, 09:56 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
315 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


convinced this guy to jump ship.. hehehe

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=1236426

coz I let the camera did the talking... smile.gif

125 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0271sec    0.68    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 09:30 PM