No conspiracy theories as a crutch please. If you want your thread to continue, please argue based on findings.

New world order is not a conspiracy theory. Don't simply slam label around when you have not done your reading.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_(politics)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_government
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Order_(political_system)


And even if there's conspiracy theory discussed, it is as much applicable as other unproven scientific theories, which are simply theories.


As long as the conspiracy theory has valid grounds it can be discussed, but if stuff like satanism and religion comes in, then you know it's bunk.


Human behaviour/greed is a major part of political policies and it has demonstrated how it is a part of corruption in the scientific process. The evident of conspiracies in the email has shown that conspiracies are not theories.


If you have a cognitive dissonance problem, that is YOUR problem but that doesn't mean human factor should not be discussed and that you simply dismiss things you cannot understand as conspiracy theory to shut people up.

That is the classic case of failure to take human behaviour into question when formulating a theory why certain policies come to the way they are. You do not simply label things you do not understand or don't want to understand as conspiracy theories to discredit an argument or opponent. It fully reflects on a person's immaturity and cognitive dissonance and inability to discuss conceptual potentials.

Looking at facts alone without regard for character/quality of people potentially influencing the facts, like what the scientists did to massage data, is a sign of a failed scientist.

Since master root of information can be doctored, it is imperative that a person's character and his facts/source be discussed and not simply dismiss things you do not understand as conspiracy theories, it makes you no different from the scientists who've committed fraud and who's decided to use the very same conspiracy theory weapon on dissenters.

That's why most scientists are laughable to me, they never take the human factors into consideration when studying so called 'facts' of science.

The science of science itself is neutral but when you have human equation in, you cannot dismiss the human behaviour influence by labeling any discussion of character/intent of a person or group of persons as conspiracy theories. That is the classic case of how intellectual terrorism is used by those in power to dismiss people from questioning their policies.

This post has been edited by manami: Nov 22 2009, 02:15 PM

I'll say it again no conspiracy theories if you want this thread to live.

You don't even understand what's being discussed here, and start throwing that threat and label around. You have a cognitive dissonance problem.

Closed. A pity really since I thought there were some interesting things to talk about here. NWO huh....sure. Again try Kopitiam section please.