Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V32!, The Orange Legion
|
achew
|
Oct 23 2009, 10:01 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Hinika @ Oct 23 2009, 09:51 PM) wat kind of uv filter ? like normal hoya uv filter ? or pro1d uv filter ? HD uv filter ? o.O" any recommended flare-less uv filter ?? feel protect-less w/o filter = =" if i nt wrong..u get flares on all filters..but those exp one doesnt look so obvious.. soon u'll get used to shoot without filter..u shd b carefull with or without filter anyway..n cheap filter nt only giv u flares..it degrades ur image quality too
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 23 2009, 11:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Oct 23 2009, 10:46 PM) I am been poison with STD seriously....the reason is....wait talk later btw, i notice one thing, not sure is true or not, alpha kit lens 22500 produce bokeh is also like paint bokeh (true?)  that time before STD out, i saw other ppl using carl zeiss or minolta good lenses can produce round dot round dot bokeh in backgroud, i think wah so beautiful bokeh unlike kitlens bokeh. but come to STD, look like paiting bokeh also wor... but all ppl like this bokeh, then what different of STD with 55200 but seriously back to the reason, the STD background 100% look picture are seperb sharp  after seen few sample from web site hmm??u mean STF??
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 24 2009, 07:54 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Hinika @ Oct 24 2009, 07:31 AM) what are those good filters u mean, can list some brands and model with price? Pro1D series wan thinner rite ? cause more flare or less ? if i not wrong...prod1D should be around 150...B+w around 180~200(depend on diameter)...carl zeiss not sure... @clive i thought u sent ur a700 for calibration? This post has been edited by achew: Oct 24 2009, 07:55 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 24 2009, 04:50 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MemorableStudios @ Oct 24 2009, 10:28 AM) C&C please... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « 1)  2)  3)  4)  5)  Added on October 24, 2009, 10:33 amC&C please.. 6)  7)  8)  9)  10)  somehow some of the shots look a lil bit pixelated at certain places..is that normal?? nice shots btw..
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 24 2009, 05:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MemorableStudios @ Oct 24 2009, 05:14 PM) used a 3rd party picture resizer software, got this lousy result...  original sizes (up to 24Mpx) are fine.. but just too big to upload.. maybe u take 1 photo...resize it to the same size using photoshop..to see whether its stil the same??then we can know its the size..the photo..or the software perhaps? QUOTE(ieR @ Oct 24 2009, 05:15 PM) well, to me, every photo i will zoom out until about 800x600 scale to view(4R size), because that is the proper view (for me) coz when u view something that is zoomed in so much, ur eye will notice more flaws in specific then zoomed out, that u see flaw as a whole. but that pic when zoomed out, it looked marvelous~!  i know ur point..but i think might b related to the resizing sw he mentioned..coz i also editing 24mp photos recently..but i dont see those stuff even if i zoom in...sometimes even when i edit photos from a300 @ 100%..i dont see those kind of pixels too...of coz i know i'll see flaws..but the pixelated area just look diff to me..
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 24 2009, 05:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(MemorableStudios @ Oct 24 2009, 05:31 PM) RAW = 40 MB xFine Jpg = 15-20 MB i use cRaw nowadays..i find it quite okay and reasonable file size...but of coz..if storage is not at issue..i'd use Raw..lol....i only have 2 x 8gb..and 1 x 4gb...so when shooting event..probably i'll do cRaw..just in case..
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 24 2009, 11:12 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ieR @ Oct 24 2009, 10:52 PM) ahhh my apologies to MemorableStudios and achew, i didnt realise bout the pixelated photoes, at first i tot it was my internet was slow that the photo not complete loaded (some compression jpeg load that way from the internet) hahaha, until i see it again then i notice those  haha..  never sleep enough huh
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 25 2009, 02:11 AM
|
|
did i just saw my name? =p
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 25 2009, 05:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Oct 25 2009, 02:03 PM) STF ------>  awwwwwww...anyone saw a 2nd hand set?? >.< @mcline congrats on the new hoot~! btw...the last photo like got a lil bit motion blur
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 25 2009, 05:55 PM
|
|
on the very least...i should look for 2nd hand set..hehe...more specifically..2nd hand set in malaysia..coz SG 2nd hand set is close to msia new set price..1.4ksgd vs 1.5k sgd..lol...
@jimlim who knows..maybe ppl need funding for other stuff like FF..70200G..blablabla =p
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 26 2009, 02:44 AM
|
|
FREEZE!!!!!!  my 11days old niece... =)
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 26 2009, 12:45 PM
|
|
sweet dreams~  slightly under exposed..lol This post has been edited by achew: Oct 26 2009, 12:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 26 2009, 01:15 PM
|
|
woke up by the noisy shutter...
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 26 2009, 01:29 PM
|
|
QUOTE(albnok @ Oct 26 2009, 01:23 PM) e-jump: Ooo I forgot - you can also use your flash wirelessly in HSS mode! However, the flash head must be straight (despite it being wireless.) achew: LOL cute! At that age my niece wasn't bothered by the shutter, though - probably depending how sleepy she was. lol...i was using 50mm..probably i gone too close to her...when i press my shutter..she sort of like frightened a lil..lol..
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 26 2009, 01:43 PM
|
|
she cant see anything yet..doc say 11days old can see black shadow only..lol...
and yea..i never use flash on all the shots..her mum doesnt allow...even tho i only plan to bounce..but well..decided not to go against her will..lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 26 2009, 05:13 PM
|
|
somehow this time the photos didnt poison me that much..haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 26 2009, 07:52 PM
|
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Oct 26 2009, 05:58 PM) but actually right, i think the model's face is correctly exposed lor.. i had the same feeling too...but probably thats after he reprocesd it..? anyway from the photo i feel like its over exposing the bg..so maybe initially it was correctly exposed n model was under exposed..?
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 27 2009, 09:58 AM
|
|
QUOTE(e-jump @ Oct 27 2009, 07:00 AM) Here it is bro http://www.mediafire.com/?dtyzovtkyznIm never good with UFRaw and Lightroom as i only know 'auto'  This would be a great learning experience if i can use your PP as reference to edit my pic  my style of quick edit on ur raw =) orig  achew edition  =) ur one is too warm for my linking...so this is what i did.. tune the temp tune the exp to show backround(mask off the model) tune the exp to show more of the model(mask off the background) slightly lowering the contrast(not the usual me =p ) slightly "beautify" the model clone another layer gaussian blur + 30% overlay with 40% mask on the dress (since ur orig edition make me feel that u wan something dreamy..but only 30% coz its already very saturated) This post has been edited by achew: Oct 27 2009, 10:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 27 2009, 10:17 AM
|
|
ops..orig as in orig edition by him....the one i saw in RAW is slightly overblown..but not that warm =)
|
|
|
|
|
|
achew
|
Oct 27 2009, 10:26 AM
|
|
QUOTE(lildaredevil906 @ Oct 27 2009, 10:22 AM) im a jpeg shooter mostly.. and u know la, u need to post process stuff.. cause the orig, most of the time, when i take it, its not that nice =P lighting issues.. i still havnt gotten a grip on my cam yet under low light conditions.. sometimes my flash will overexpose some areas.. but since im with jpeg only, if a picture like his, over expose until like that, could be saved on raw, under jpeg can it be tweaked as well? slightly can...but in jpeg..most of the time the details r gone...raw can preserve much more imo.. lets wait for albnok edition =) This post has been edited by achew: Oct 27 2009, 10:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|