Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D5000 V6, Entry Level Digital SLR from Nikon.

views
     
zellleonhart
post Dec 2 2009, 10:51 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(C.P.U @ Dec 2 2009, 10:36 PM)
Errr Mine swivel left right, top and behind as well.. Mine dun come TTL, that why cheap smile.gif I use manual
*
Owh yea, if it's like that then im looking forward to your outcomes =)
zellleonhart
post Dec 2 2009, 11:32 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(C.P.U @ Dec 2 2009, 11:13 PM)
I just newbies in DSLR.. this just my first DSLR after my semi pro.... blush.gif  I dunoe what is TTL also.. since I not dunoe what is that, I think why not I learn from using manual instead. =) What I can see after few shot.. the flash useful for infornt and dark place... still learning.. happy.gif hope sifu here can teach me... 1 thing me must overcome is my hand shaking.. not steady enough...
*
TTL is a mechanism where the flash will adjust the power automatically according to the situation you are shooting. So you wouldn't need to adjust manually everytime unless you need for special purposes.

You should learn to use bouncer/bounce card instead of diffuser. Diffuser wastes the flashgun's power. A bounce card can be self-made easily and it performs even better than a diffuser. (if you are rich you can buy DEMB diffuser, which somehow looks more like a bounce system for me)

For hand shakes, it requires a lot of experience and practice. Or just use higher shutter speed / higher aperture (low F number)/ Higher ISO / Flash gun.


Added on December 2, 2009, 11:33 pmAnd tripod too for night shots/ light trails/ landscape etc =)

This post has been edited by zellleonhart: Dec 2 2009, 11:33 PM
zellleonhart
post Dec 2 2009, 11:37 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Dec 2 2009, 11:34 PM)
u can't really just say its a waste. diffuser softens the flash power if u're doing direct shot. useful especially for portraits  tongue.gif
*
Trust me, bounce card/bouncer saves more power than a diffuser. To get a similar exposure, using a bounce card needs a lower flash power than using a diffuser. And the effect of bounce card produces even smoother shadow and eliminates harsh highlights.

Well later experience will tell you. But of course a diffuser is more convenient, just attach and that's it. Bounce card need to consider the angle of the reflection of lights, etc.
zellleonhart
post Dec 2 2009, 11:49 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(HosieryGuy @ Dec 2 2009, 11:43 PM)
Frankly I am still a newbie with DSLR - trying to understand fully ISO, aperture and shutter speedĀ  sweat.gif

Somewhere I read big aperture number lead to more detail in focus whereas small aperture number will lead to less detail to be focused. Guess I am still trying to find the balance.

Just wonder when do I need to use F36?

Thanks!

p/s: Thanks also for other bro who shared their thought too. In fact the whole idea of the shot was to compare how much detail get focused with different aperture - both min to max.
*
It's not about how much detail is focused. You will never be using F36 though, F18 will be excessive already. Normally the lowest aperture i use is F12 or F14.

In daily shots and most of my shots, I use the highest aperture (for my lens it's F3.5-5.6). why? because it creates a good bokeh (the unfocused area which is blur) and it can capture in low light well. No body uses more than F8 in normal shots unless you are shooting a landscape or trying to focus on many parts.

In normal shots you just want an specific object to be focused right? If you are shooting a person, of course if the person is sharply focused and the background is blurred, it will be a better photo. I am afraid I'm not that good in explaining, well keep practicing using different aperture, you will figure out which to use naturally tongue.gif

EDIT:
owh i noticed in previous page you are shooting something like landscape. But there's no meaning or subject in the photo. If you are focusing on the tree, then use high aperture (3.5~7.1 will be enough), ISO use the LOWEST since it's daytime and you have a TRIPOD!

If you are trying to focus on everything, F8.0~12.0 will be more than enough. and ISO don't use auto, set it manually =)

This post has been edited by zellleonhart: Dec 2 2009, 11:53 PM
zellleonhart
post Dec 3 2009, 01:20 AM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(C.P.U @ Dec 3 2009, 12:15 AM)
May I know either the bounce card is the white card above out flash gun? I saw the original the flash gun have have a piece diffusser(plastic)(read from manual call as diffuser0 and white card above the flash. is that bounce card you mentioned?
*
Yea it's a bounce card also. but i dont use that, i custom make one bigger one.

QUOTE(faiz92 @ Dec 3 2009, 12:33 AM)
Bounce card is much easier to use. From my POV la.
But, bounce card cant go 'far' right? tongue.gif
*
Yea i think more versatile. but cannot go far. if wan go far then direct shoot lo... or use diffuser, but i dont have one.

QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Dec 3 2009, 12:50 AM)
any of u fellas wanna take my under used 18105? tongue.gif
*
I would like to take it but no money =x
zellleonhart
post Dec 3 2009, 01:39 AM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Dec 3 2009, 01:23 AM)
is ok.. 1 month later u get it from me  rclxms.gif
*
Wah u wan give me for free? really?
zellleonhart
post Dec 3 2009, 01:41 AM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(SkyBlue99 @ Dec 3 2009, 01:40 AM)
cash upfront first 1K then when i pass item to u is free..

will open receipt stating FOC  drool.gif
*
==
zellleonhart
post Dec 5 2009, 01:45 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


Why i can't shoot like this cry.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


And i get like this
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


I bounce the flash and use ISO 400 already T.T why still so harsh and not natural like the 1st photo? I know my gear is not as good, D40 + kit lens, 1st photo is using prime lens, but is there anything I can do to improve the natural feeling?
zellleonhart
post Dec 5 2009, 02:07 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(General_Nic @ Dec 5 2009, 01:58 PM)
same problem with u  sad.gif
i think main suspect is prime lenses
good diffuser or bounce card make some difference oso
*
I can't say my bounce card not good, cuz it can reflect a lot of light. I just use a cardboard with pure white A4 paper and tie with rubber band on my flash. If bounce card not good then it will be underexposed already le..

Body and lens not good? Haiz
zellleonhart
post Dec 5 2009, 03:23 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


Diffuser and bounce card? Can explain in detail? I only know how to make a bounce card. What material should i use?
zellleonhart
post Dec 5 2009, 04:22 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


I know about Demb diffuser but it's rather expensive for me...

Anywhere got sell those velcro straps? Using rubber band is not convenient. and Im searching for suitable material for the front diffuser now... Tracing paper can help? But i need a plastic though.
zellleonhart
post Dec 5 2009, 06:38 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(asrul @ Dec 5 2009, 06:13 PM)
this one im quite confuse  rclxub.gif

is there any specific setting that i need to change @ my d60?
*
Just open your pop up flash in your D60, then switch on your Di622, press the MODE button until the orange light BLINKS (not just light up). then u can adjust the power and flash wirelessly
zellleonhart
post Dec 5 2009, 08:57 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


Backpack u can't get for RM200 if you want good brand... I am using Kata DR-467, i got it at RM320, maybe u can consider about it... Not as sturdy as lowepro but this looks better and has AW proof (all weather proof)...

I wrote a very short review here...
http://crystallizedmemory.blogspot.com/200...dr-467-bag.html

This post has been edited by zellleonhart: Dec 5 2009, 08:59 PM
zellleonhart
post Dec 6 2009, 11:13 AM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(Firdaus92 @ Dec 6 2009, 01:17 AM)
Can you direct me to a place or link where I can find such bags?I'm thinking about that Kata too before~ But maybe a little out of budget. Since a lot of programs after SPM that need money tongue.gif Maybe I work first then fork out some of the money to upgrade my kit~ Anyways, is the Kata bag, can turn sideway?I mean like when you use the bag, if you want to take out your camera, just pull it to your waist and pull out your DSLR?Is there any bag with such feature??Really noob about bag sweat.gif
*
Lowepro fastpack can just turn to your waist and you can take your camera, but it's not convenient cuz i have the kata and my fren is using fastpack. You need to open the cover infront only can unzip the zip and then take out the camera, while kata u just need to swing the bag to your front (when u carry it on your right shoulder only) and then take it.

Depends on what way do you prefer. And lowepro doesn't have all weather proof...

Here's a very detailed comparison between lowepro fastpack 250 and kata dr467 =)
http://thatpixelgeek.com/2008/09/kata-467-...o-fastpack-250/

This post has been edited by zellleonhart: Dec 6 2009, 11:14 AM
zellleonhart
post Dec 6 2009, 05:48 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


No they are not the same. Lowepro is easier to take out the camera cuz it's side loading. But i like kata because it looks better and doesn't tell ppl "come rob me i have DSLR" XD

Lowepro looks very nerdy, very solid, not that fashionable IMO. But the build quality is rclxms.gif very very good, its padding is better than kata.

But kata is cheaper, and DONT BUY at shops outside like lowyat plaza, they sell for RM499 or even more expensive. You can buy in lowyat trade zone, it's cheap.
zellleonhart
post Dec 6 2009, 10:01 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(exiakitt @ Dec 6 2009, 09:56 PM)
Went to shoot PCfair to test D60+AFS 35mm. No flash used.
Click below to view the result biggrin.gif
*
Some are well exposed! Prime lens no need flash also bright T.T
how much ISO u used?
zellleonhart
post Dec 6 2009, 10:30 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


200 can get so good exposure... If with flash no need say, sure nice T.T
Mine ISO 400 with flash also underexposed... kitlens only >.<
zellleonhart
post Dec 6 2009, 10:39 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


if u have flash, use ISO 400 + your 35mm then perfect le...
zellleonhart
post Dec 6 2009, 10:55 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


I hope next year this time i already own a prime lens sad.gif
or a D90 tongue.gif
zellleonhart
post Dec 7 2009, 12:08 PM

Stars stars stars
*******
Senior Member
5,075 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(Mavik @ Dec 7 2009, 02:47 AM)
Its a matter of balancing your aperture, shutter speed, ISO and flash all together. How did you use your flash? A pop up flash?
*
No im using Nissin Di622 with a bounce card. The showgirl is not underexposed, but the background is underexposed. ISO i used 400, aperture lowest possible (F5.6 i think), shutter speed i manually put 1/50, and that's the lowest speed i can handheld with least handshake.

here's the outcome:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


i can't get photo like this: (not my photo)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


So i think either it's because i dont have a prime lens, or my D40 noise control is weak (ISO 800 is very noisy) or i dont have a good bounce card. But i think it's because of the noise control though, i should have used ISO 800 =( or get a prime..

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0421sec    0.83    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 11:09 PM