QUOTE(lostasylum @ Aug 24 2009, 11:03 AM)
i disagree with point 6 and agree with point 8.
for point 6, although stats may show that he's been doing the same old thing, i feel that his play this season in a 4-3-3 formation is more incisive and the passes more penetrating. last season, he was still making the same number of passes, but they didn't really provide the bite that we needed. i suppose that's why the denilson skeptics always say that his passes are just sideways. in the game against pompey, he was less outstanding, but that's probably he had to do a lot more defensive work to do since song wasn't playing and diaby is very attacking minded. but still, the passes were simple, and he wasn't trying too hard.
as for point 8, i really have to agree about the one touch too many that slows down the midfield, and also the fact that his defensive workrate just ain't good enough... that's why although i would readily agree that diaby is capable of great goals (like the 2 he scored against pompey), i still remain a diaby skeptic.
I was never bothered by the "sideways passing" comments about Denilson as I believe it's a myth similar to his "lack of physique" and "lack of height" to play in the DM position. Towards the end of last season he has been acting as the midfield link man who collects the ball and spreads it to the other players eg Fabs or the other flank players, and he is doing it in a consistent and simple way. Hence my "typical Denilson" comment which is more of a compliment than a criticism.
Diaby... the jury is still out but credit should be given as he did impress vs Pompey despite the minor complaints which we agree upon. Abou needs to be consistent and avoid injuries before he can start thinking of securing a starting lineup position. Song will be absent during early next year due to ACN so if Diaby manages to keep up the good work he might just give Song a run for his money.
Now this is hilarious...
http://www.football365.com/story/0,17033,8...5510765,00.htmlReplays clearly show that Utaka's right foot got tangled with his left shin and he tripped on his own, whereas Gallas never even touched him. Since it is from "The Sun" which are more often dodgy than not, I'd give Utaka the benefit of doubt. But if he really claimed that it was Gallas's fault than I'd lose all respect for him.