unless u really don consider to buy any more lens...else y don get a smaller bag..at least u could bring 1 extra lens..maybe a tele + a prime....or UWA + tele..

im quite a pixel peeper...but for wedding..capture the moment is much more important than pixel peeping..if really really cannot...i rather increase to 800/1600 instead of getting blurry photos....the noise would be terrible..but well..at least u capture it..and there are chances where u could save it during your PP....and usually if ppl print the photos..it wont be so big..so the noise isnt that obvious too...

yep yep..i did that too...but 90% of the time....able to recover the noise during PP..

i eager to know the new a850 is a high end apsc or budget FF...at least i can start planning my lens line up >.<

if its a FF..sigh..gotta sell my beloved 1680...and den stucked btwn 2470/70200..

great..everyone is going home/out to play....and im going to work in 30mins time....

in the night there is nobody more superior than engineer =)

but cannot slp la...1st no place to sleep..guard walking all around..2nd..my phone wont stop ringing..anything small/big prob..the whole wold would call engineer first

i only hope for a peaceful night..nothing big happen..just spend my time chatting with operators..wahahahaha

TT sounds fun TT_TT

check r u focusing on the correct place..if focused correctly...the rest is just play around with ur shutter...and the moment on ur hand/tripod...

does a850 + 70200G consider expensive enough??

i need a good quote



but again..no liveview makes me hesitate a lil...sigh...

This post has been edited by achew: Aug 2 2009, 04:43 PM

i might leaning toward FF to match 70200G..and hopefully the price of this new a850 would be attractive enough..else i don see the point sony release something almost identical to a900..

been waiting for ages..lol...
did u notice i shoot slightly lesser nowadays...been working OT..wahahhaha..10days OT = 70200G..guess i would have to have another try for Aug..and budget for new camera would be there...hehehe


but the thing is...if i chance a FF..i probably wont use 1680...and where the heck i can get a replacement for that..zzzzz....2470 not an option if i choose 70200..probably need something cheaper..

awww...180mm...i was just wondering how could he get so close with the bee..its not like impossible..but it takes hell lot of patient...

lol..10days is alot bro~ after working for a year..i notice i've bcome alot more lazier...work more than 3days per week..and i felt tired like hell..lol...maybe is the inconsistent working hours for 12hrs makes me that way

anyway..back to the topic..
usd2000 was just rumoured right...who knows it might ended up like 2500...
i was just telling my gf that i might b getting this new FF soon..and she asked me..so whats the diff btwn this n a900??i said..almost same but with cheaper price...and she came out with a good question.."i thought that time u decided not to buy a900 due to the lacking of liveview..and since this is the same..whats the point to buy??u dont really mind on the price tag isnt it" so now..im getting confused..lol...what makes me to get this one over a900...


btw..if it doesnt have a built-in flash...god..how could i ever shoot in wireless mode again~~!! T_T i always very proud of my camera that i could shoot in wireless without any additional stuff compare to nikon/canon...now looks like have to get a F20 in order to do so? sigh...

---

Added on August 2, 2009, 6:31 pmi might be traveling once/twice a year...thats y once inawhile my 1680 comes in handy with the superb range..afterall..its the very first reason y i bought my first dslr.....

This post has been edited by achew: Aug 2 2009, 06:31 PM

burst rate also not too concerning me..lol..
if i gonna upgrade..i probably choose FF if possible..so that it saves me some $ from gradual upgrading..as well as better usability if im getting one of the 2470/70200

i dont think so....its not stated in the manual..

hmm?? does the % represent the amount of % u see out of the whole picture?? i thought for a900 its like what u see is what u get..

haha..i understand...initially i tot all the while my concept about the 100% viewfinder thingy was wrong..lol..

when u get ur quote..let me know yea

from the sony/minolta naming convention..it looks like the next a100 to me...

50mm F1.4 is a FF lens...and i think it probably boils down to ur portrait style...for me *most of the time* i would find 3x mm(on apsc term) a lil bit too wide for portrait of my style...i'd prefer 85~1xx >.<

wow..lurker~

nah..most probably not going to buy it...im kinda afraid i hav too many lenses and i rarely use them...trying to get a set across the range i'd use...and thats it...and now im planing 70200G as my portrait lens + my 50mm F1.4...guess shd be enough?