Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Acer Aspire 4736 club
|
TSronho
|
May 1 2009, 10:18 PM
|
|
Got Acer 4736...specs.... T 6400 --2.0 CHz, 2mb , 800 FSB 1 GB DDR3 Widescreen 14 inch 250 GB HDD 1 Year warranty RM 1999 comments on this bros ?? price of DDR3 nowadays ? tx
This post has been edited by ronho: May 2 2009, 10:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
lordzarx
|
May 1 2009, 10:24 PM
|
|
wat the gpu? new model arr?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nidz
|
May 1 2009, 10:25 PM
|
|
ddr3 2gb is around rm120.... robyncom imbi plaza...
|
|
|
|
|
|
nothing_nth
|
May 1 2009, 10:36 PM
|
|
feel like kancil using ferrari's TYRE... the speed nt juz depends on ram itself only...bt overall it is quite a nice spec la...
|
|
|
|
|
|
ic3rock
|
May 1 2009, 10:46 PM
|
|
QUOTE(nothing_nth @ May 1 2009, 10:36 PM) feel like kancil using ferrari's TYRE... the speed nt juz depends on ram itself only...bt overall it is quite a nice spec la... Lol, kancil cant fix ferrari tyre la,  I agree with notebook speed nt juz depends on ram, even yea, u oso cant see the diff thru eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
chuanway
|
May 3 2009, 02:20 PM
|
Getting Started

|
.
This post has been edited by chuanway: Nov 1 2012, 10:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
DragonSilver
|
May 3 2009, 04:22 PM
|
|
DDR3 will bottleneck, since the CPU only 800FSB.. DDR2 667 already enough..
|
|
|
|
|
|
astria
|
May 3 2009, 04:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(DragonSilver @ May 3 2009, 04:22 PM) DDR3 will bottleneck, since the CPU only 800FSB.. DDR2 667 already enough.. 400MHz also enuf la...
|
|
|
|
|
|
DragonSilver
|
May 3 2009, 09:39 PM
|
|
ya 400 is enough dram:fsb ratio - 1:1
but if consider the price, ddr2 667 is much cheaper
This post has been edited by DragonSilver: May 3 2009, 09:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSronho
|
May 3 2009, 10:22 PM
|
|
bro chuanway...that was the other model that was mentioned by the salesman...recommended me to get the t4200 but wanted to lansi a bit and got the t6400---extra rm300  ,,you also got more freebies than me
|
|
|
|
|
|
prioritieskillerz
|
May 3 2009, 10:50 PM
|
Getting Started

|
add rm 100 and get aspire 4530. better processer, 250gd hd, got geforce 9100m g.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lordzarx
|
May 3 2009, 11:54 PM
|
|
is there a version of this laptop using integrated gpu? how many version does this model have?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSronho
|
May 4 2009, 07:51 AM
|
|
wow, models make you confused....some shops got more models, some less...so really makes it difficult to compare
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beouwulf
|
May 4 2009, 09:06 AM
|
|
QUOTE(prioritieskillerz @ May 3 2009, 10:50 PM) add rm 100 and get aspire 4530. better processer, 250gd hd, got geforce 9100m g. 4736Z and 4736 is much better than 4530. They run cooler, faster and saves more battery power than 4530.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mcken
|
May 4 2009, 10:10 AM
|
|
im planning to buy Acer 4763. Any comment? The spec and price seems good...i m more on multitasking and photo editing and conversion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSronho
|
May 4 2009, 06:31 PM
|
|
4736Z and 4736 is much better than 4530. doh.gif They run cooler, faster and saves more battery power than 4530.
yea for 4736 !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
prioritieskillerz
|
May 7 2009, 03:27 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Beouwulf @ May 4 2009, 09:06 AM) 4736Z and 4736 is much better than 4530. They run cooler, faster and saves more battery power than 4530. agree about the battery power and the heat. 4530 runs amd. so nothing we can say bout th heat. but still the prccser run fster than 4736. just use cooler la~ Plus got nvdia 9100. better for gming purpose. This post has been edited by prioritieskillerz: May 7 2009, 03:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
huattk
|
May 7 2009, 08:06 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Beouwulf @ May 4 2009, 09:06 AM) 4736Z and 4736 is much better than 4530. They run cooler, faster and saves more battery power than 4530. If you don't play games, 4736Z may be slightly faster. If you play games, 4530 will be almost 2x faster. All credits go to the Nvidia 9100M chip. I'm sorry but Intel graphics on the 4736 just sucks some serious balls. But as far as battery life goes, 4736 should last quite a bit longer. I think both sets should be just as hot, with 4736 a little cooler. At idle time though, the AMD set should be slightly cooler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beouwulf
|
May 7 2009, 09:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(huattk @ May 7 2009, 08:06 PM) If you don't play games, 4736Z may be slightly faster. If you play games, 4530 will be almost 2x faster. All credits go to the Nvidia 9100M chip. I'm sorry but Intel graphics on the 4736 just sucks some serious balls. But as far as battery life goes, 4736 should last quite a bit longer. I think both sets should be just as hot, with 4736 a little cooler. At idle time though, the AMD set should be slightly cooler. I've tried running 720p video on both notebook, 4530 hanged after 4 hours+, 4736Z still running smoothly on the 8th hour. Turion + 9100M = HEAT This post has been edited by Beouwulf: May 7 2009, 09:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
prioritieskillerz
|
May 8 2009, 04:57 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(huattk @ May 7 2009, 08:06 PM) If you don't play games, 4736Z may be slightly faster. If you play games, 4530 will be almost 2x faster. All credits go to the Nvidia 9100M chip. I'm sorry but Intel graphics on the 4736 just sucks some serious balls. But as far as battery life goes, 4736 should last quite a bit longer. I think both sets should be just as hot, with 4736 a little cooler. At idle time though, the AMD set should be slightly cooler. agree! geforce way better than intel graphic. but still the same probs. the heat. anyway i still love this lappy. bang for ur buck!
|
|
|
|
|