Thanks braynumb. Glad you liked it. (: More to come hopefully. =p
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V27!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Jun 15 2009, 11:51 AM
|
 
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 12:55 PM
|
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There...
|
QUOTE(Kul | Mo0 @ Jun 15 2009, 11:51 AM) Thanks braynumb. Glad you liked it. (: More to come hopefully. =p keep it comming bro!  so, was it or was it not the 50mm f2.8 lens u were using? just curious...  |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 01:21 PM
|
 
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL
|
HiroBoroi: The other later Minolta that had dual dials was the Minolta Dynax 9 (1998). I love how the dials are symmetrical.
http://www.mhohner.de/sony-minolta/bodies....mlu=0&vg=0&sf=0 As you can see, it travelled all the way down to the Sony Alpha 100. Nikon pretty much ditched the dual dial setup after the F4. Though, I have to say, it was one Nikon I'd actually say was ugly (though the removeable prism was ubercool.) http://www.nikonians.org/html/resources/ni...ison_chart.html |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 01:24 PM
|
Senior Member
2,884 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Mummy 
|
Street price for SAL50F18????????
|
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 01:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There...
|
Sony price is RM599 if I'm not mistaken...
|
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 01:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,884 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Mummy
|
QUOTE(Braynumb @ Jun 15 2009, 01:32 PM) Sony price is RM599 if I'm not mistaken... That one I know already........ Canon and Nikon's version much cheaper wor........... |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 02:08 PM
|
Senior Member
3,366 posts Joined: Oct 2005
|
Kul | Mo0: nice composition. A bit saturated though...nice catch~
C&C Appreciated~  |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 02:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There...
|
QUOTE(bysquashy @ Jun 15 2009, 01:50 PM) That one I know already........ Canon and Nikon's version much cheaper wor........... Don't remind me... but Sony is Sony la... besides, it's still new what... and with new SAM motor inside also... that's a good bargain already for me... guess now we just need to wait for the street price... should be cheaper...This post has been edited by Braynumb: Jun 15 2009, 02:24 PM |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 02:26 PM
|
Junior Member
296 posts Joined: Jan 2007
|
Spam for v27..
Taken with SAL50mm 1.4..  |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 02:27 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There...
|
nice one... poison ler....
|
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 02:54 PM
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3 
|
guys 28mm is equivalent with 18mm in FF izzit?
the formula is (focal length) / 1.5 izzit? This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Jun 15 2009, 02:56 PM |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 02:58 PM
|
 
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri 
|
QUOTE(MechaHerc @ Jun 15 2009, 02:54 PM) guys 28mm is equivalent with 18mm in FF izzit? using 28mm on full frame is like 18mm on aps-cthe formula is (focal length) / 1.5 izzit? using 28mm on aps-c is like 42mm on full frame This post has been edited by soulfly: Jun 15 2009, 02:59 PM |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 03:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,967 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Side 3
|
QUOTE(soulfly @ Jun 15 2009, 02:58 PM) using 28mm on full frame is like 18mm on aps-c the red one i fully understand bro but using 28mm on aps-c is like 42mm on full frame i cant imagine n understand the bold part.. yet.. i try to sketch but still dun get it lol.. how can be 42mm (i know 28 x 1.5 but.. how to explain ar  )This post has been edited by MechaHerc: Jun 15 2009, 03:15 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 03:19 PM
|
Elite
606 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(MechaHerc @ Jun 15 2009, 03:10 PM) the red one i fully understand bro but APS-C has a Crop Factor of x 1.5i cant imagine n understand the bold part.. yet.. i try to sketch but still dun get it lol.. how can be 42mm (i know 28 x 1.5 but.. how to explain ar )FF doesn't have Crop Factor which means x 1.0 So... 18mm Focal Length on APS-C = 18mm x 1.5 = 27mm 28mm Focal Length on APS-C = 28mm x 1.5 = 42mm 28mm Focal Length on FF = 28mm x 1.0 = 28mm 42mm Focal Length on FF = 42mm x 1.0 = 42mm So using 28mm on APS-C (28mm x 1.5 = 42mm) is like 42mm on a FF. |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 03:29 PM
|
Senior Member
1,982 posts Joined: Jul 2007
|
 |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 03:48 PM
|
Senior Member
1,059 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: KL
|
QUOTE(noprob @ Jun 15 2009, 03:29 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 03:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,982 posts Joined: Jul 2007
|
QUOTE(The Wonder @ Jun 15 2009, 03:48 PM) Nice scene! Where is this place? Its Switzerland |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 04:03 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There...
|
QUOTE(wha7ever @ Jun 15 2009, 03:19 PM) APS-C has a Crop Factor of x 1.5 Oooo... Now I get it! Thanks bro... Seriously... Great Info...FF doesn't have Crop Factor which means x 1.0 So... 18mm Focal Length on APS-C = 18mm x 1.5 = 27mm 28mm Focal Length on APS-C = 28mm x 1.5 = 42mm 28mm Focal Length on FF = 28mm x 1.0 = 28mm 42mm Focal Length on FF = 42mm x 1.0 = 42mm So using 28mm on APS-C (28mm x 1.5 = 42mm) is like 42mm on a FF. |
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 04:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,844 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Damansara Utama
|
Sorry just came back from lunch + shopping. Yes Braynumb , It's from the 50mm f2.8. (:
|
|
|
Jun 15 2009, 04:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,884 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Mummy
|
QUOTE(Braynumb @ Jun 15 2009, 04:03 PM) Oooo... Now I get it! Thanks bro... Seriously... Great Info... Canon APS-C is 1.6x |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0284sec
 0.37
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:59 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.