The "extreme Screamyx Slowdowns" V4, Edisi :Extreme International Slowdowns
The "extreme Screamyx Slowdowns" V4, Edisi :Extreme International Slowdowns
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 08:35 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
38 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: Putra Heights, Subang Jaya |
lolz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 09:00 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
298 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Port Dickson |
i got 10% warn
|
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 09:27 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
102 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 09:52 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
43 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Anyone got problem with the speed of torrent? Can't even go up beyond 30K. Use to have 50K++ and 100K on popular ones. Rapidshare speed is good tho. Can go up to 120K on free service.
This post has been edited by M.A.: Jun 20 2009, 09:52 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 10:04 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
256 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Britannia |
no problem with vpn. if you use without vpn, you will have problem.
|
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 10:10 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
43 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(nwk @ Jun 20 2009, 10:04 AM) VPN? Care to elaborate. It's morning and I'm still kinda stoned... EDIT: Nevermind. After rebooting, my brain finally remembered what VPN is. But then why the normal connection for torrent so slow? Has TMNet finally and actually throttle torrents? The line is good on the HTTP side because Direct downloads and Rapidshare free service can get more than 120KB/s.... This post has been edited by M.A.: Jun 20 2009, 10:18 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 10:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
306 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Your closet |
Fix my ass. It gotten worse
|
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 10:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,116 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Arsenal Lounge |
OMG
CODE Pinging google.com [74.125.127.100] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 74.125.127.100: bytes=32 time=427ms TTL=235 Reply from 74.125.127.100: bytes=32 time=424ms TTL=236 Reply from 74.125.127.100: bytes=32 time=401ms TTL=236 Reply from 74.125.127.100: bytes=32 time=434ms TTL=236 Ping statistics for 74.125.127.100: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 401ms, Maximum = 434ms, Average = 421ms And on a supposedly good ip... 60.51.xxx.xxx This post has been edited by kazek: Jun 20 2009, 10:20 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 10:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,988 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Puchong, Selangor |
QUOTE(M.A. @ Jun 20 2009, 10:10 AM) VPN? Care to elaborate. It's morning and I'm still kinda stoned... i guess tmnet "upgraded" torrent throttling... torrent speed has been like that since a few days ago.. EDIT: Nevermind. After rebooting, my brain finally remembered what VPN is. But then why the normal connection for torrent so slow? Has TMNet finally and actually throttle torrents? The line is good on the HTTP side because Direct downloads and Rapidshare free service can get more than 120KB/s.... |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 10:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,568 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Malaysia Truly Asia |
QUOTE(MX510 @ Jun 20 2009, 07:53 AM) Good speed but ur activity is log :-) easy to catch if u post or do something bad on internet or someone in ur network post something sensitive so they can trace ur ip back to ur streamyx id . I have told you your internet access now logged and copied to IANA...I don't think is good idea using this... |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
119 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
![]() Imagine that!! Ping to other international sites (USA to EUrope) varies from 600ms to 1100ms. Alot of packet loss (request timed out) to google.com and similar sites. No difference between, 115.132, 115.134,124.xx,60.53,118.101,118.100 range ip. This post has been edited by MyP2PCafe: Jun 20 2009, 11:09 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,568 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Malaysia Truly Asia |
QUOTE(fabianz03 @ Jun 20 2009, 06:16 AM) Yes looks big different now, my ping to Philippine and Singapore down to 80pings and most international now reach 1.28Mb/sec now. TMNet now have IANA IP Address, that would be bad news, they now link us directly to US military. TMNet DNS were even better now, I got 8pings to their DNS, this is absolute good news. I think majority of us getting same like mine. What about you and you guys...?This post has been edited by pengiranijam: Jun 20 2009, 11:10 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:14 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
119 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
How come you're getting good pings?
I am getting an average of 400++ms pings to singapore and 600 to 1100 ping to the rest of the world. Tried it on all my ip ranges. One strange thing however is, when downloading from my webui server which is in europe, despite the bad pings, i could get a steady speed of 165kb/s. Ping to rapidshare.com is around 700ms. Download speed fluctuates between 80kB/s to 135kB/s using premium. :S |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:17 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
![]() Nice upgrade |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
390 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Jln Klang Lama |
QUOTE(pengiranijam @ Jun 20 2009, 11:10 AM) Yes looks big different now, my ping to Philippine and Singapore down to 80pings and most international now reach 1.28Mb/sec now. TMNet now have IANA IP Address, that would be bad news, they now link us directly to US military. TMNet DNS were even better now, I got 8pings to their DNS, this is absolute good news. I think majority of us getting same like mine. What about you and you guys...? For me,all are the same as before.I always get 8ms-9ms to TM DNS and 250-300ms to US wetsites,but around 20%-50% packet loss.NO IMPROVEMENTS,the links to China websites are totally bad. |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
some say improved, some say no difference... mind stating your area while posting?
Added on June 20, 2009, 11:31 am QUOTE(MyP2PCafe @ Jun 20 2009, 11:14 AM) How come you're getting good pings? That is quite good download speed actually, but the high pings will be bad for games only...I am getting an average of 400++ms pings to singapore and 600 to 1100 ping to the rest of the world. Tried it on all my ip ranges. One strange thing however is, when downloading from my webui server which is in europe, despite the bad pings, i could get a steady speed of 165kb/s. Ping to rapidshare.com is around 700ms. Download speed fluctuates between 80kB/s to 135kB/s using premium. :S This post has been edited by andrew9292: Jun 20 2009, 11:32 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,568 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Malaysia Truly Asia |
Things is very weird, have you test ping to TMNet DNS, somewhat their DNS now unstable, can pings and sometimes can't pings...
I hope you guys can read earthquake @ http://www.met.gov.my/malay/perkhidmatan/s...smic_event.html this because oversea have earthquake can cause we getting high pings to them... There's every single minutes earthquake now, this would be bad news... this one can't helped because out of our control... This post has been edited by pengiranijam: Jun 20 2009, 11:39 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:39 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
QUOTE(pengiranijam @ Jun 20 2009, 11:35 AM) Things is very weird, have you test ping to TMNet DNS, somewhat their DNS now unstable, can pings and sometimes can't pings... I told you before, it's not infra-problems... they can control route on an user to user basis...C:\Documents and Settings\Andrew>ping 202.188.1.5 -n 12 Pinging 202.188.1.5 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.1.5: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=247 Ping statistics for 202.188.1.5: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 11ms C:\Documents and Settings\Andrew>ping 202.188.0.133 -n 12 Pinging 202.188.0.133 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247 Reply from 202.188.0.133: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=247 Ping statistics for 202.188.0.133: Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 10ms, Average = 9ms This post has been edited by andrew9292: Jun 20 2009, 11:41 AM |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:40 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
49 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: PJ |
My connection is unstable
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] © Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Sam>ping www.youtube.com Pinging www.youtube.com [64.233.189.100] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.189.100: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=247 Reply from 64.233.189.100: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=247 Reply from 64.233.189.100: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=247 Reply from 64.233.189.100: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=247 with every ping having at least 1 of them 42/43ms |
|
|
Jun 20 2009, 11:40 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
1 thing i notice is now the ping and the actual ms u'll get in game r totally diff now ( exp if i ping WOW for 280 ms i'll get ard 280 - 300 + ms in game ) . I ping WOW just now i got 270 ms but when i login to game i got ard 400- 600 ms and spike .
Well i think last night they did something to this rather than so call " upgrade " .......... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0285sec
0.47
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 02:55 AM |