QUOTE(fabianz03 @ Jun 28 2009, 02:43 PM)
You sure we'll have better connection?Â

Well, i'm pretty sure things will be improved. But in terms of to what kind of extent, again, i'm have no idea. My requirements are simple, so long i can check my emails every day, do my daily task and etc. i'm good though. I'm not a heavy downloader too though....
Different usage has different criteria and requirements. To me, the bottom line is, it's stable for online gaming, daily usage and stuff like that is okie, i'm good.
In fact, i think whether are we going to get a stable and reliable broadband services, it pretty much depending on us as a user. If we do not do the right things by using the right method to push it through. I guess the authority will not feel the urgency to improve things. Hope you get what i mean.
There're many ways of pushing it through. The questions are:
- what kind of channel do we have? If channels aren't exist, are we going to create one?
- what kind of method is considered a right channel or method to use? What would be the best way to look for options and come up with one without waiting for the authority? The answer is to put in efforts and test it out and pick the most possible ones.
- consider, should the so called right channels have yet to exist, which are those we can use or create while waiting for the so called right channel come to an existence?
- would us the users utilize whatever channel to push it through or to just sit and wait and expecting things will go straight?
I'm not going to put in efforts into something that having a success percentage rate lower than 50%. When i do something, i must ensure i'll have certain degree of control to increase the percentage of making it or pushing it to the intended result.
I recalled what had been discuss during the MCMC meeting. One thing MCMC got it right was:
- MCMC hope they can get to the right users who really face problems. They do not wanna be the next Frost & Sullivan or Reader's Digest who MIGHT get to the wrong users and giving the awards to the wrong ppl.
- That's why MCMC do put a request to me and seeking co-operation. That's why i mentioned i'll full my full co-operation to MCMC whenever and whichever they need.
I had, personally, make some enquiries to the relevant parties who giving out the awards. But seems like no response from them. What does that mean? i don't know. The only perception i have now is a totally a brand new perception toward those 2 organization who awarded TM's streamyx.
My stuff on this matter is on the schedule. MCMC provided me some suggestion on where should i go to and things like that. I'm currently working on it. Without solid and right actions from the users things will just be as slow as we all can predict. In terms of solid actions, i hope and encourage more and more users to take initiative to get in touch with MCMC. Meet them up, express your issues and concerns. When the numbers going high up, the higher the number, the faster and the more improvements we'll be able to see.
For what i've said and done or doing now,
IT'S NOT AN ACT OF OFFENSIVE AND HAS NO MEAN TO PUT ANYBODY OUT OF BUSINESS, BUT TO STRIVE AND WISH A STABLE AND RELIABLE BROADBAND SERVICES WILL BE A REALITY FOR EVERYONE.That's all i can say. Again,
the choices in terms the majority is ours, as a user. With the numbers we have, it's more than enough to make a stable and reliable broadband services a reality.
Well, no offense, and hope it helps.
This post has been edited by webdesignempire: Jun 28 2009, 04:09 PM