QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Dec 26 2012, 09:59 AM)
I concur with you two.
Ok, even the Mukim falls under Semenyih, ok lah, if they market a HillPark Kajang if the township is big and really bordering and easy accessible to Kajang. Title sometimes confusing. But if postal address also Semenyih but to sell as Kajang?
I also wondering MKH other project, Saville @ The Park Bangsar. I see the Malay Reserve Land project is located at Pantai Hillpark or next to Kg Pantai but cant imagine they call it Bangsar, which is far separated by a federal highway. My Bangsar frens really laugh it like hell. Dunno why they use Bangsar... Even use Bangsar South name by UOA also a bit, hmm. No opinion of this troublesome project.
Maybe they will build a land next to The Arte @ Subang ( opps its Shah Alam ) n name it as Hillpark @ Subang or Glenmarie and both sama sama market an exactly Shah Alam project ( with Shah Alam poscode ) under Subang Jaya.
But as a big developer or player, they should have know their masterplan very well and quite well inform of the lands surround its masterplan project. To say, they dunno they are factories, a huge number going to build at next to it's own land, then I feel the developer was not honest enough.
Sudah lost creditability, MKH.
Chris,
I mentioned in my earlier comment that Pandan Indah, ampang which is in Selangor, is using 55100 Kuala Lumpur postcode. Since the are is under MPkj, it is not technically wrong. The buyers are well aware that the property they are buying is in the mukim of Semenyih as it is clearly stated in the S&P.
For the Bangsar project, Pantai Hillpark is next to Bangsar. "Bangsar South" can be referred to as just "Bangsar", regardless north, south, east, west.
It could just be a piece of vacant lot in the masterplan because the other party which built the factories, submitted their application to do so way aftr the application for a housing project on the other side was approved. That piece being somebody else's and the approval given by the authorities, the developer has no say.
Just like my previous house in SS2, Petaling Jaya which is on the main road leading to the LDP - there was no bus stop in the masterplan of a bus stop on the residential side. There is one across the road on the commercial side which is seperated from the shops by a drain and an elevated road behind the bus stop. Years later, the authorities gave permit to bus companies for buses to ply the residential side. The bus drivers and passengers started using my house as a bus stop creating a nuisance as I can't get in or out of my house with tha swarm of people blocking the entrance and they were even bold enough to walk right in to my house to use the mango tree and porch as shelter from the sun and rain despite it being a PRIVATE PROPERTY. Authorities took their side. I had battled with them for more than a decade and finally they decided to change to route only to see the buses back again after a couple of months. problem continued despite me telling them the front of my house is not a gazetted bus stop. after another year plus of battle, the erected a No Parking, No Waiting and NO Stopping road sign just before my house. The drivers continued to stop in front of my house. It another two years plus of battle and finally, a bus stop pole was planted two blocks away from my house, in front of a bridal shop.
Should I fault the developer for that?
Added on December 26, 2012, 10:43 am[quote=kajangnewbie,Dec 26 2012, 10:21 AM]
Chris,
I mentioned in my earlier comment that Pandan Indah, ampang which is in Selangor, is using 55100 Kuala Lumpur postcode. Since the area is under MPkj, it is not technically wrong. The buyers are well aware that the property they are buying is in the mukim of Semenyih as it is clearly stated in the S&P.
For the Bangsar project, Pantai Hillpark is next to Bangsar. "Bangsar South" can be referred to as just "Bangsar", regardless north, south, east, west.
It could just be a piece of vacant lot in the masterplan because the other party which built the factories, submitted their application to do so way after the application for a housing project on the other side was approved. That piece being somebody else's and the approval given by the authorities, the developer has no say.
Just like my previous house in SS2, Petaling Jaya which is on the main road leading to the LDP - In the masterplan, there was no bus stop on the residential side. There is one across the road on the commercial side which is separated from the shops by a drain and an elevated road behind the bus stop. Years later, the authorities gave permit to bus companies for buses to ply the residential side. The bus drivers and passengers started using my house as a bus stop creating a nuisance as I can't get in or out of my house with that swarm of people blocking the entrance and they were even bold enough to walk right in to my house to use the mango tree and porch as shelter from the sun and rain despite it being a PRIVATE PROPERTY. Authorities took their side. I had battled with them for more than a decade and finally they decided to change to route only to see the buses back again after a couple of months. problem continued despite me telling them the front of my house is not a gazetted bus stop. after another year plus of battle, the authorities erected a No Parking, No Waiting and NO Stopping road sign just before my house. The drivers continued to stop in front of my house. It took another two years plus of battle and finally, a bus stop pole was planted two blocks away from my house, in front of a bridal shop.
Should I fault the developer for that?
This post has been edited by kajangnewbie: Dec 26 2012, 10:43 AM