Wiggy. LOL. Last time I saw an aunty surf Internet at Starbuck with P1 box modem. Blinking red. Hahaha.

well, the P1 is still new ISP, so what we can do ? waiting them to improve or back lines to Streamyxxxx....

I see they have improved the speed for some locations, hopefully it will solve for the entire network.

OWC: Your place still slow?

Mine still okay after 1 month though:

i think the latency issue could be on Int link. i ran speed test compared p1 speed test and speedtest.net, they are huge difference in term of latency. furthermore, i test ping cont with 1kb and see below:-

C:\Windows\system32>ping p1.com.my -t

Pinging p1.com.my [122.255.96.138] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 122.255.96.138:
Packets: Sent = 7, Received = 7, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 87ms, Maximum = 104ms, Average = 94ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Windows\system32>ping p1.com.my -t -l 1024

Pinging p1.com.my [122.255.96.138] with 1024 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=95ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=149ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=93ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=129ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=102ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=111ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=107ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=91ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=98ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=100ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=96ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=107ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=96ms TTL=124
Reply from 122.255.96.138: bytes=1024 time=105ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 122.255.96.138:
Packets: Sent = 15, Received = 14, Lost = 1 (6% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 91ms, Maximum = 149ms, Average = 105ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Windows\system32>ping jaring.my -t -l 1024

Pinging jaring.my [192.228.128.20] with 1024 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.228.128.20: bytes=1024 time=96ms TTL=55
Reply from 192.228.128.20: bytes=1024 time=170ms TTL=55
Reply from 192.228.128.20: bytes=1024 time=92ms TTL=55
Reply from 192.228.128.20: bytes=1024 time=120ms TTL=55
Reply from 192.228.128.20: bytes=1024 time=93ms TTL=55
Reply from 192.228.128.20: bytes=1024 time=102ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 192.228.128.20:
Packets: Sent = 6, Received = 6, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 92ms, Maximum = 170ms, Average = 112ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Windows\system32>ping speedtest.net -t -l 1024

Pinging speedtest.net [69.17.117.207] with 1024 bytes of data:
Reply from 69.17.117.207: bytes=1024 time=828ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.17.117.207: bytes=1024 time=722ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.17.117.207: bytes=1024 time=785ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.17.117.207: bytes=1024 time=771ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.17.117.207: bytes=1024 time=801ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.17.117.207: bytes=1024 time=800ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.17.117.207: bytes=1024 time=744ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.17.117.207: bytes=1024 time=727ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.17.117.207: bytes=1024 time=745ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 69.17.117.207:
Packets: Sent = 9, Received = 9, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 722ms, Maximum = 828ms, Average = 769ms

---

Added on April 9, 2009, 11:31 pmeveryday slow

no improvement.

pay RM 99 for this speed?



This post has been edited by lagolago: Apr 9 2009, 11:31 PM

Uh oh... What's up with that awesome ping?

where is ur place tho? inside coverage?

---

Added on April 10, 2009, 12:33 am

This post has been edited by kazasho: Apr 10 2009, 12:33 AM

i get this speed at night only

but the speed are normal morning time.

i already call the CS but speed still like that when night

I saw some people posting their speed is back to normal a while ago but somehow a few people still having the same old low throughput issue, but where?

It seems like isolated area that are having download issue.

Please share your location.

sungai way petaling jaya

Guy.. i say this at p1 website





10Mbps Downlink... very fast.. have 10GB fair usage threshold... but why its only 10GB????

This post has been edited by syahpian: Apr 10 2009, 01:17 AM

the new package would not cater to most users

agreed.

I think they should make it 20GB!

Don't agree, it's not meant for heavy usage anyway as it's not meant to be used in the house the first place.

This wiggy package is meant for more on business subscribers or outdoor usage. It provide you up to 10Mbps, because the main point is to deliver a fast connection when you're working on a business talk or even presentation, but not really for heavy download or entertainment stuff. So, I think the 10GB threshold is reasonable.

This post has been edited by Acrisius: Apr 10 2009, 02:12 AM

Slow speed and high ping at shah alam

yakah?? me here okey.. im now at shah alam oso



and its very fast oso

This post has been edited by syahpian: Apr 10 2009, 02:47 AM

guys, can anyone tell me what's the best torrent program to use.. i am using thunder (xun lei), but like slow only.... help... plsss

With 10mbps pipe.. u get more done in less a time.. and in no time u will reach the quota

up to 10Mbps? awesome

1. first test speed


2nd one..


3rd one...


i have no idea. something wrong there..