QUOTE(zerohunter @ Apr 19 2009, 02:29 PM)
hmm, nvm let's try the 7750 1st. which is a good batch to grab>?
bout the batch, me myself oso not so sure which batch is better, u try find some review, if thy can do 3.4Ghz, and if thy got a snap on their proc sink, thn u can refer the batch frm there. but, normal the batch not at here

anyway, the best i can suggest is u get something batch like bro apis them 1.. atleast can do 3.2Ghz.
QUOTE(herojack41 @ Apr 19 2009, 02:34 PM)
kejap kejap.....i still nt yet try my best to reach 3.2ghz

btw...my ram divider is 1:2...izzit because i running x3 1gb ram?
:/x just now take of da hsf...and forgot to see da batch number :/x
btw...installing crysis now :/lol: i wonder onboard HD3200 can play? :/P
depend on ram default speed la.. if u use 800mhz ram, mean DRAM show by cpuz will be 400 that will bcome 1:2, and this ratio can be change at bios at ram setting as i told be something like:
400
533
667
800
1066 or
mayb some bios showing:
200
266
333
400
533
** this can be call as ram multi for k10 architecture
QUOTE(nazseha @ Apr 19 2009, 02:55 PM)
Just now try OC with nvidia control panel performance....
can modify the HT multiplier..but not the NB...:/hmm:
btw,seems like tat software got bug or my computer problem..bcoz whenever i wana save the profile..or i juz click save/profile...my computer will completely hang.. :/stars:
i suggest that dun ever save a OC profile under OS, coz if u can successful save it, it will load this setting each loading into OS, either take a long time to loading this or direct hang each time u go in OS. so wat u can do is js press apply, dun ever save it...
*this is my advise due to facing similar prob b4, end up gotto format hdd
QUOTE(XiuKeong @ Apr 19 2009, 03:18 PM)
wat now? 3.1Ghz happy?
faster clock higher la.... zzzzzzzz.....
ah_khoo oledi 3.3GHz wat...
QUOTE(xixo_12 @ Apr 19 2009, 03:25 PM)
time for new board :/hehe: :/x
yeah, agrree.. dun aspect too much am2 board to run a am3 chip, am2 board hv a prob on bus system, which at HyperTransport 1.0/1.1 which supported 2000/1600 MT/s which mean support HTlink 1000/800 for k8 chip, unlike am2+/am3 board which using HyperTransport 3.0 come with max 5200 MT/s equal to max 2600MHz for HTlink/NBfreq(NB i not sure included or nt).
that is the main prob for nazseha, which running a 1800MHz chip on a 1000MHz HTlink supported board..
conclude by new board is waiting for u nazseha
QUOTE(BigSaver @ Apr 19 2009, 04:03 PM)
wosh..guys..i read some review mention PII x3 720 BE can totally beat X4 810 n some benchmark on 920 and 940..isit true??user x3 pliss gv some comment yeah..thanks
totally beat? i dun thk so.. only agree if the performance catch up to those chip n beat em on few benchmarking software, that still is possible.
every chip running on stock 720 only is a x3, mayb it hv priority compare to 810 mayb the cache size is a bit larger. but not say every software/benchmarking will do better with larger cache. the clock speed n number of core working still ply a vy vy important role.
if u say 720BE unlock to x4, it tough to get stable at higher clock which other x4 can reacher higher clock with stable..
if u say the max clock, yes 720 can do higher clock compare to 810, but it is x3 while 810 x4,
so there is some tread off to do if u need either higher clock or more cores for 720BE.
QUOTE(apis @ Apr 19 2009, 04:22 PM)
I totally prefer X3 720 BE rather X4 810 coz higher L3 Cache,higher clockspeed and the price is cheap compare to X4 810.OC this X3 720 BE,u won't regeret it.
anyway, 720BE still is good chip, worth to get it if u able to unlocked it to x4 as a extra bonus for u. for a gamer, 720BE may a good choice.

--------------------------
**human always doing wrong, do correct me if i'm wrong