Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies Stephen King's IT, Why So Serious? - Horror Version

views
     
Mov_freak
post Sep 21 2017, 01:53 AM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


It (2017)

Time, how fleeting are thy....

This Stephen King novel, was publish in 1986.

I read it during 1989, because a friend recommended it.

I don't remember liking it (due to Stephen King's writing style) and was mildly amused by the 1990 miniseries because John-Boy (Richard Thomas) from The Waltons was in it.

Again, I was not overwhelmed with "OMG I luv this so much."

Just watched this earlier, and I am tickled pink!!

Why?

For those who is "used to" my reviews, I do tend to "go on and on" about nonsensical reminiscence. I apologise, if I am reverting to my normal style of writing.

The reason why I am tickled pink in, in the book, the story (when the kids were young) took place in the 50s (about the same time as Stand by Me)

In this iteration (this movie), the cleverly moved forward the timeline of the kid to the 80s?

Again, Why?

I have a feeling, they (script writers) sneakily, brought it to the 80s, because alot of people would remember reading IT during the 80s. So they can relate very substantially, because they live it.

Smart S.O.B.s..... (pardon my french)

All the 80s references, were NOT lost to me, and as I had indicated, it added to my viewing pleasure.

Production Designer Claude Paré did a fantastic job (bringing back the 80s). Same goes to Set Decoration, Rosalie Board.

And of course Costume designer, Janie Bryant.

Script, was great. (I did not appreciate the books going back and forth between the adults and children)

Cast, strong (poor Georgie.....)

And, I totally agree with the R rating. Kids, please do not watch this until you can handle it.

Great Movie and the fact it is horror, heaven....

My Two Sen




Mov_freak
post Sep 23 2017, 08:42 AM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


Hey Guys. Chill okay. Everyone has the right to their own opinion. Please stop with the name calling.
Mov_freak
post Sep 24 2017, 06:59 PM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(LightningZERO @ Sep 24 2017, 12:27 PM)
I personally don't feel this movie is scary or creepy as all. But it is so good. A great blend of suspense, built up, laughter and awesome moment. I want the sequel to be similar in tone too. The kids are just too awesome

My only complaint is probably the build up and random encounter with IT in 1st half of the movie was a bit too much and IT lost its scary elements to me
*
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Mov_freak
post Sep 26 2017, 03:17 PM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


Good news!!

Released date of the IT sequel announced for Labour Day 2019!!!
Mov_freak
post Dec 19 2017, 08:29 PM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


It (2017) (Addendum)

For my original review, please go to

Mov_freak's IT review

What I want to talk about here now is the HD version of this movie.

Fantastic transfer

The picture quality and sound if excellent.

Although the book took place in the 1980s... the movie brought the time line to 1990s.

The details are amazing (picture and sound)

Definitely is reference for me.

My Additional Two Sen
Mov_freak
post Dec 19 2017, 08:30 PM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


Would it not be interesting, if they waited 27 years to make IT's sequel, so they can us the same actors for the sequel?? tongue.gif
Mov_freak
post May 10 2019, 09:40 AM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


Nice
Mov_freak
post Sep 6 2019, 12:33 AM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


It Chapter Two (2019)

It is no secret, I liked the 2017 IT.

Casting, Sets and direction were spot on!

So, how does the second one fare?

Well, casting is great. Apart from Bill (James McAvoy), the other adult casts do look like their younger counterpart.

James Ransone really capture his younger counterpart mannerism. Kudos

The direction and cinematography started great. Shots were well planned and followed on well with what was done in the first movie.

Story-wise... it suffers a little.

And I blame the source material.

This movie suffers the same issue I had with the book.

The cutting back and forth between the past and present, made the flow of the movie a little clunky at times.

I am also not sure if they shot the kids bits during the first episode, because they look the same as when they were in the first movie (eg. kids grow up so quickly)

I did guess Richie Tozier's secret and I have to admit, I got the subject wrong.... Am I making sense?

So, overall, great movie.

Would have been better if there are more scary.

As per usual, the above is my two sen.

This post has been edited by Mov_freak: Sep 7 2019, 09:51 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0204sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 06:36 AM