Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Movies Stephen King's IT, Why So Serious? - Horror Version
|
6so
|
Sep 12 2017, 07:16 AM
|
Getting Started

|
Glad the updated version panned out to be much better and to a degree the kids outdone certain aspects of the book. Really curious how much of Cary Fukunaga's treatment retain over this version. Pretty sure that could be a very different than this somehow semi arthouse and semi commercial end product.
PS: What's up with all the pedobear enthusiasts keep pointing out the gang bang scene not in the movie. I do question what relevance does that bring to the movie and furthermore it just wrong to expect it gonna end up in a major studio offering. Love it or hate it...Stephen King has a tendency to do over batshit crazy things in his stories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6so
|
Sep 13 2017, 07:42 AM
|
Getting Started

|
A very different interpretation of the movie based on the previous scripts by Cary Fukunaga. Thought the casting of Ben Mendelsohn as "It" is perfect. Bill Skarsgard still did a bang up job and I think Mendelsohn will give it more nuanced and even more creepy. Definitely will be much more darker and not afraid to be disturbing. http://screenrant.com/it-movie-2017-origin...-cary-fukunaga/
|
|
|
|
|
|
6so
|
Sep 4 2019, 11:40 AM
|
Getting Started

|
Not as worthy as the first outing. Movie length and wishy-washy pacing puts me off. Started to feel Pennywise overstaying his welcome by the second act. As good as the grown up casting, but they don't stick the landing on a whole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6so
|
Sep 8 2019, 07:35 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Mov_freak @ Sep 6 2019, 01:33 AM) And I blame the source material. This movie suffers the same issue I had with the book. The cutting back and forth between the past and present, made the flow of the movie a little clunky at times. As with majority of King's books, his third act usually spiral into mumbo jumbo territory. On the pages, the effect not that pronounce but on a visual medium, it's jarring and messy.
|
|
|
|
|