QUOTE(~Battousai~ @ Feb 18 2009, 12:14 PM)
dude whole sentence is wrong. head light is more suited for baseliners then u can get racquet head speed easily. while head heavy for stabilization on serves and volleys


...with all due respect ~Battousai~ mate, since from reading these posts i know you are a very established player so you are armed with the relevant knowledge and experience... however, i was not too shabby from my day also (selvam should me know me, from the pacific days

) and from -my- yonder knowledge, i was taught (and subsequently teach) that head-heavy was for baseliners, since i) they had ample time to generate the swing and ii) the extra mass helps generate more power for the shot... as for server-volleyers, they need not generate power, just direction... but do need mobility at the net, thus the need for head-light racquets... both logically and dang-it, also from experience i know that to be true... in fact, my previous publications of tennis magazine still state that as a fact, so there... heh...
QUOTE(artemis348 @ Feb 18 2009, 01:04 PM)
You mentioned Sampras with headlight, so that's inaccurate. Also, volley-ers don't swing at the net.
I stated serve-volleyers as a general group, not sampras (you should really note the
wrong generalisation i put in there)... sampras did have those lead tapes, all along the sides of his racquet, but like i said, at his level he could swing a sledgehammer at the net and still get the ball on the uh... hammer... i am not comparing pros with the rest of the weekend warriors mate...
QUOTE
As for Wilson having developed the Hammer for Sampras, that was the claim at the time. How true it is, only Wilson and Sampras knows. Also, if you don't already know, the pros have customized racquets from the manufacturers, and there are usually nothing like the retail versions. So the analysis that if you could crack those flimsy things and that Sampras would have destroyed them is clearly moot.
...seriously, I am from that time, by that i mean the range was released during my time, and in no time did any publication from wilson or any magazines say the hammer was intended for sampras... sampras always played with the pro staff, courier too (there was a red, white and blue one for him, which if one from was my time, one would remember)... oh and there was an article in tennis magazine also that sampras did play with a retail version of the pro staff (as several of the pros did... not all, but several), the only change being that he had a customised grip size... hence the need for his custom balancing with lead tape... i'll give you a quote from tennis magazine which supports this...
QUOTE
How do the racquets you customize for the pros different from what the regular player buys off the rack?
People see things in magazines that the pros use completely different frames. It’s not really the case. There could be slight, slight differences. But mostly it’s in the customizing. So the inside of the frame is made the same or in a very similar way. The company may add a little weight because the player needs it to be heavier, but otherwise it’s very similar to what you buy.
...some players like (i'll use one example from my time) agassi, who had trouble switching from prince racquets to donnay, so they took a whole bunch of prince precision racquets, sprayed them flat black and he competed with them... but everyone knew they were his old racquets, all the way to the stabilizer bar at the middle of the uh... whatchamacallit... racquet neck... loads more examples where that came from... i think manufacturers really can't be bothered to make a totally different racquet, even for their big-name big-bucks stars... so you see, the flimsy hammer racquets would've been lighter, or heavier, or different balance, but internally the construction would've been the same thus my blown-to-smithereens point...
QUOTE
And as Battousai says, you got them backwards. The headlight racquets are more suitable for the baseliner big swings, and the heavier heads are more suitable for volleys.
again, i refer to my existing knowledge and experience... maybe you live in a different generation where the rules of physics have changed, but there we go...
...okay look guys, i really do not need a flame war here... maybe my understanding of the game has somehow warped, or new standards exists regarding racquets, or whatever... i just wanted to share what i knew, so if you really need to counter my statements, please research first and link me any supporting statements, okay? really, i would like to update my knowledge... seriously i have not played since the millenium so i -may- not have the current facts...
anyways, peace y'all!