QUOTE(andrekua @ Feb 21 2009, 07:14 PM)
I beg to differ. Seeing how much the damage has been, how much worse can it be? I dont see a reason why banks should be protected and nationalised anymore. If the banks cant survive then just lelong all the assets and buyers will show up to grab these assets at all time low. Thats how it should work. Some people would be affected as usual but the damage is pretty much limited to the amount of deposit it has and if you compare it to the amount that the government gonna spent on these bailout, just pay them back the deposit and everyone is happy except the shareowners and the creditors. If we businessmen have to be content with losses when purchasing expensive goods, so are banks. Why should they be any different from us. Besides they arent even being transparent despite the fact they are being public listed companies. I dont see any problem with world financial frozen out because credit should be tight as it should be in the first place.
Besides, the main point is I DONT SEE HOW I CANT TRUST THESE COMPANIES TO TURN AROUND LIKE THEY HAVE PROMISED WHEN THEY ARE LOSING SO MUCH. IT WOULD TAKE FOREVER TO PAY BACK THE MONEY THEY OWE. WHATS THE LOGIC IN LENDING SOMEONE RM100 WHEN THEY CANT EVEN PAY YOU THE RM50 THEY OWED.
Exactly, thats what the US government likes to do and that's why it benefits the speculators and the risk takers. Cant afford to pay your mortgage, just ask Uncle Sam to pay for you? Besides, the main point is I DONT SEE HOW I CANT TRUST THESE COMPANIES TO TURN AROUND LIKE THEY HAVE PROMISED WHEN THEY ARE LOSING SO MUCH. IT WOULD TAKE FOREVER TO PAY BACK THE MONEY THEY OWE. WHATS THE LOGIC IN LENDING SOMEONE RM100 WHEN THEY CANT EVEN PAY YOU THE RM50 THEY OWED.
That's why Rick Santelli was revolting because the US GOVERNMENT tends to reward guys with bad financial planning, irresponsible Americans.
So why pay any thing at all, when Uncle Sam will pay for you?
Feb 22 2009, 02:26 PM

Quote
0.0297sec
0.66
6 queries
GZIP Disabled